Goran Ivanišević

Born: September 13, 1971 in Split (Dalmacija in Yugoslavia)
Height: 1.93 m
Plays: Left-handed (two-handed backhand)
Ivanišević stands as one of the most psychologically intriguing players of the ’90s. He was a constant chameleon, altering his appearance regularly: long hair, short hair (at the start of 1992, he sported an almost bald “mohawk” hairstyle), with stubble, a full beard, or clean-shaven. He’d don a cap or a headband, and in 1996, a flamboyant plume above his forehead emerged. “I think young people like it. Old people, you know, are not so happy. It’s tough to please old people. They complain too much,” he quipped about his eccentric hairstyle.
Consistency wasn’t his forte; Ivanišević rarely wore the same T-shirt for longer than a month, though he favored the “Sergio Tacchini” brand, and stuck his entire career to “Head” racquets with yellow over-grips. His constant sartorial changes painted a picture of emotional inconsistency. On-court jests and amicable interactions with people could abruptly transform into eruptions of anger. Throughout the ’90s, he found himself embroiled in dramatic matches more frequently than any other player.
In matches involving Ivanišević, anything seemed possible: a 15-13 victory in the fifth set against Richard Krajicek, or a heart-wrenching 12-14 loss in the fifth set against Magnus Norman. He twice equalled the record for the longest tie-break (20/18) within four years, triumphing against fellow left-handers Daniel Nestor and Greg Rusedski. He clinched other marathon tie-breaks: 15/13 (Guy Forget), 14/12 (Jason Stoltenberg, Sébastien Lareau), or 13/11 (Fernando Luna, Hendrik Dreekmann, Cyril Saulnier) while other experienced players rarely go above 10-all. Astonishingly, he found ways to lose tie-breaks despite leading 5:0 or 5:1.
In 1998, he found himself embroiled in major three-setters consisting of three tie-breaks, losing to Marzio Martelli, then defeating Jan Siemerink in a unique Open Era match where the winner saved set points in all won sets. His matches resembled a roller-coaster ride, swinging between extremes. His phenomenal serve, arguably the best of the ’90s, was his cornerstone. Often leading to victories, it was occasionally a double-edged sword. Upon analysing his serve, I arrived at, perhaps, controversial conclusions. I often sensed that, even against top players, he deliberately provoked difficult situations to test his mentality under pressure.
I witnessed numerous matches where, at 4:5 or 5:6 in a set or in a tie-break, he gifted the opponent an opportunity only to erase it with an ace/service winner, even off the second serve. He relished the thrill of winning sets on the brink of losing them. While his serve rescued him many times, it also caused bitter defeats, deserting him in crucial moments of significant matches. Three Wimbledon finals saw his serve betray him, once (1992) against Andre Agassi as a favorite, and twice (1994 and 1998) against his toughest rival, Pete Sampras. It also faltered thrice in “Masters” semifinals (1992, 1993 and 1996).
A notable example was his encounter with Sampras in Hannover ’96. Ivanišević served phenomenally that day, notching 35 aces in three sets. As the deciding third set tie-break loomed, he led 30/0 in the 12th game. However, three casual errors gifted Sampras a match point. Ivanišević unleashed a 186 kph second serve, the fastest that day, but it sailed out. Sampras, disbelievingly observing the speed measurement, shook his head in disbelief. Despite being only a month younger than Sampras, Ivanišević was initially ranked higher in their first two years on the tour, already reaching the Australian Open ’89 quarterfinal when Sampras was actually unknown. Their encounter in the Munich quarterfinal in 1990 (Grand Slam Cup), where Sampras barely clinched victory, laid the groundwork for a mental edge for the American.
Though Ivanišević navigated tight situations adeptly in general, against Sampras, a few points here and there often separated him from clinching crucial victories. However, by the end of 1995, Ivanišević revamped his coaching staff and began winning matches consistently. Between December ’95 and March ’96, he competed with astonishing frequency, securing five titles in the process. He finally ousted Sampras in the Key Biscayne semifinal. Just when it seemed he would dethrone the American, fatigue took its toll, forcing his retirement in the final. Nevertheless, it marked the pinnacle of his career, his most prolific year.
The late ’90s brought stagnation, leaving many expecting Ivanišević to be remembered as the best player of his generation without a major title. And then came Wimbledon ’01 – an event of miracles. Ivanišević [125], a mere ‘wild card’ entrant, caused a stir by defeating Carlos Moyá in the second round. The seven-time champion, Sampras, fell in the fourth round to a young Roger Federer, paving the way for the Croat. Mirroring his mid-’90s form, he served exceptionally and luck favored him (winning back-to-back matches being two points away from defeat). At 30, reminiscent of Andrés Gómez and Petr Korda, Ivanišević triumphantly raised the most coveted trophy in tennis.
“I don’t care now if I ever win a match in my life again,” Ivanišević said after the memorable Monday final against Patrick Rafter (his semifinal against Tim Henman extended over three rain-hit days!). “Whatever I do in my life, wherever I go, I’m always going to be Wimbledon champion.” He didn’t achieve anything worth remembering afterward, Wimbledon ’01 marked Ivanišević’s glorious swan song. He’s the only player to achieve noteworthy results representing two countries: in 1990-1991 he played the World Team Cup finals for Yugoslavia, third final (1995) in this competition he notched representing Croatia, and for this country – carrying the flag at the opening ceremony in Barcelona – he won the Olympic bronze medal, winning four successive five-setters (before and after him, no-one has done it in the Open Era), two of them withstanding match points in the fifth sets. After retiring, he regularly participated in the Champions Tour and then began coaching players born in Yugoslavia: Croatian Marin Čilić and Serbian Novak Đoković, helping them in winning Grand Slam events.
Career record: 599–333 [ 337 events ]
Career titles: 22
Highest ranking: No. 2
Best GS results:
Australian Open (quarterfinal 1989, 94 & 97)
Roland Garros (quarterfinal 1990, 92 & 94)
Wimbledon (champion 2001; runner-up 1992, 94 & 98; semifinal 1990 & 95)
US Open (semifinal 1996)
Grand Slam Cup 1995 champion
Olympic bronze medallist 1992 in Barcelona
World Team Cup 1990 champion (for Yugoslavia)
Davis Cup champion 2005 (he was only a member of the Croatian team in the final)
Hopman Cup 1996 champion (for Croatia)
Posted in Players | 1 Comment

1993 and 2023

January: Week 1Week 2Week 3/4 (AUSSIE OPEN)
February: Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8
March: Week 9Week 10/11 (Indian Wells) – Week 12/13 (Miami)
April: Week 14Week 15 (Monte Carlo) – Week 16
May: Week 17/18 (Madrid) – Week 19/20 (Rome) – Week 21
June: Week 22/23 (FRENCH OPEN) – Week 24Week 25Week 26
July: Week 27/28 (WIMBLEDON) – Week 29Week 30
August: Week 31Week 32 (Toronto) – Week 33 (Cincinnati) – Week 34
September: Week 35/36 (US OPEN) – Week 37Week 38Week 39
October: Week 40/41 (Shanghai) – Week 42Week 43
November: Week 44 (Paris) – Week 45Week 46 (“Masters”) – Week 47 (Davis Cup)
December: Week 48 (“Young Masters”) – Summary
Rivalry at the Top
In 1993, the entire season was captivated by the rivalry between two US players: Pete Sampras and Jim Courier. One year older Courier continued his astounding form on clay and hardcourts, which had begun at Indian Wells ’91, while Sampras finally lived up to the expectations set by his US Open ’90 title. However, the latter part of the season saw an abrupt end to this rivalry. Courier lost his form, and concurrently, Michael Stich, who had been relatively successful earlier in the season, surged, dominating the autumn of ’93. Looking back, Stich may be regarded as the most successful player in the final quarter of the season, clinching three indoor titles, two of which were highly prestigious (especially Frankfurt), and leading Germany to victories over Sweden and Australia in the Davis Cup, triumphing over almost all the top-ranked players of that time.
Thirty years later, the first half of the season was marked by a rivalry among three players: Novak Đoković, Carlos Alcaraz, and Daniil Medvedev. Jannik Sinner joined in the latter part of the season, initially in a more cautious mode as his Wimbledon semifinal and victory in Toronto were partially due to very favorable draws. In the autumn, he ascended to a higher level, defeating all three higher-ranked players multiple times, including Medvedev thrice and Đoković twice.
The Fall
Guy Forget, one of the leading players of the early ’90s, suffered a severe injury at Hamburg ’93, sidelining him for nearly a year and causing a significant drop in rankings from no. 17 to 623. That year was critical for Ivan Lendl, the most dominant player of the ’80s, as it was the first time since his teenage years that he was unable to be competitive in the “best of five” format. He also lost his edge in crucial moments of tighter sets, a trend that continued in 1994, leading to his retirement at the age of 34. Andre Agassi, a Top 10 player from 1988 to 1992, experienced the first of his two major crises in his long career (the second would occur in 1997), resulting in a plummet to no. 24 by the end of the season.
Three decades later, more elite players had a disastrous season, especially Rafael Nadal, one of the greatest players of all time, who participated in only two events at the beginning of the year and dropped from no. 2 to 670 (two places below him is Marin Čilić, the former US Open champion, who also played just two events this year, beginning it as no. 17). Nadal’s compatriot Pablo Carreño Busta falls down from no. 13 to 606 having played three ATP events (two Challengers). Nine years younger than Nadal, Nick Kyrgios played just one event, resulting in his disappearance from the ATP ranking after being ranked no. 22. Matteo Berrettini, another significant name in the past few years, faced physical problems throughout the ’23 year, plummeting from no. 14 to 92. The 27-year-old Berrettini began and ended the year positively, first aiding Italy in reaching the final of the United Cup, and then concluding the year on the bench, motivating his younger Italian compatriots during the Davis Cup triumph.
The Rise
Nineteen-year-old Andrei Medvedev was a rising star in 1993. The Ukrainian, with a somewhat wooden yet efficient style, proved to be successful on all surfaces. Many pundits viewed him as a potential main rival for Pete Sampras in the second half of the ’90s. However, Medvedev’s peak was actually reached the following year, before he turned 20. Although four of Medvedev’s peers finished their careers with more accomplishments, in 1993, none of them was frequently mentioned in the same breath as Medvedev. Here’s a ranking comparison of the best players born in 1974 at the end of 1993:
6 – Andrei Medvedev
76 – Àlex Corretja
88 – Thomas Enqvist
102 – Yevgeny Kafelnikov
372 – Tim Henman (before his ATP debut)
Two prodigies born in 2003, Carlos Alcaraz and Holger Rune, confirmed their tremendous potential displayed a year before. As I write this, it seems they along with two years older Jannik Sinner – could create a new “Big 3” in the ’20s. However, it’s a shallow assumption that doesn’t account for super-talented players born in the mid-2000s who might emerge in a few years. The current best teenager, Arthur Fils, is ranked 36. My early estimation suggests he may have a more successful career than a fellow Frenchman, Gaël Monfils.
Veterans
The age of veterans shifted from the age of 30 to 35 over thirty years. In 1993, there were few players who could turn 30 and still pose a threat. One of them was Ivan Lendl, mentioned earlier, but at 33, he reached his physical limits. Other famous players in their thirties who were approaching the twilight of their careers included Brad Gilbert (32), Anders Järryd (32), as well as Mikael Pernfors and Henri Leconte, both at 30. The former French Open champion Andrés Gómez decided to retire at 33 in 1993 while four years older Björn Borg, the icon of the 70s, finally played the last match in his professional career, ultimately completing his retirement which had been initiated… ten years earlier. Thirty years later the most significant name to finish career is John Isner (38), a man who brought serving and playing tie-breaks to another level.
In 2023, Novak Đoković defied the age paradigm by securing three major titles and enjoying one of the best seasons of his illustrious career at the age of 36. Other players from his generation still achieved notable results: Andy Murray, only seven days older than Đoković, reached the final in Doha; 37-year-old Gaël Monfils triumphed in Stockholm; his contemporary Richard Gasquet commenced the season with a title in Auckland, and 38-year-old Stan Wawrinka was a runner-up in Umag. Feliciano López, aged 42, reached the quarterfinals in his farewell event this year (Mallorca). Thirty years ago the oldest player to win an ATP match was Jimmy Connors (41). Below is the ranking of players aged 35 and above in the Top 100:
1 – Novak Đoković
42 – Andy Murray
49 – Stan Wawrinka
74 – Gaël Monfils
76 – Richard Gasquet
Game-styles
In 1993, the trend initiated in the late ’80s/early ’90s continued, transitioning from aluminium racquets to graphite ones (Cédric Pioline was a significant exception), which led to increased serve-and-volleyers garnering points directly behind their serves, primarily focusing on tie-breaks. Notably, Pete Sampras, Michael Stich, Goran Ivanišević, and Richard Krajicek epitomized this style, contrasting with players like John McEnroe (finished his career at the end of 1992, but took part in two exhibition events of ’93), Stefan Edberg or Pat Cash (due to injury he missed the entire ’93 season), who were faithful to the chip-and-charge strategy as returners. Boris Becker stood somewhat in between; in the mid-’80s, he was a prototype for players who emerged in the early ’90s. Canadian Greg Rusedski entered the scene in 1993, known later for breaking his own records in serve-speed as well as being super dependent on tie-breaks. At that time, the magical velocity touched 200 kph (125 mph) – rarely crossed by servers. Other young player, who gathered some attention in 1993 it was Australian Patrick Rafter, a follower of the McEnroe/Edberg tradition. These two “R” native English speakers would face each other in an unexpected US Open ’97 final, and Rafter’s finesse triumphed over a show of brute force in a duel of two different S/V mindsets. Rusedski finished the year 1993 ranked 50th, Rafter 16 places below. More than four years later they’ll enter an event trying to become world’s no. 1 (Key Biscayne ’98).
At the end of 1993 in the Top 20, there were eight serve-and-volleyers, nine offensive baseliners, and three defensive baseliners (noting that Michael Chang was improving his serve, transforming into an offensive baseliner in the mid-’90s). The landscape is somewhat simplistic as players often adjusted their styles based on the surface (carpet was still popular, encouraging players to more offensive attitude indoors). The ratio of one-handed and double-handed players inside the Top 20 was pretty balanced.
In contrast, today, only two players among the Top 20 use one-handed backhands (Stefanos Tsitsipas & Grigor Dimitrov), and there’s a single style prevailing across players – offensive baselining – regardless of the surface. Among the current top twenty, only Alex de Minaur and Cameron Norrie adopt a more defensive approach during baseline exchanges. Termed “defensive baseliners,” their gameplay differs significantly from the excellent clay-courters of the mid-’90s, such as Sergi Bruguera and Thomas Muster, who operated deeper behind the baseline, with higher net clearance.
Statistical summary of these two seasons here
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 48 (NextGen)

…2023…

Saudi Arabia, the largest country in the Arabian Peninsula, long envied its neighbours such as Qatar and the UAE for organizing ATP tournaments. Saudi Arabia finally made its debut by hosting the Next Generation ATP Finals, an event spotlighting the talents of the top eight players aged 21 and younger. Previously held in Italy since its inaugural event in 2017, this experimental tournament introduces unique rules not commonly seen on the professional circuit. Among this year’s innovations were: the absence of a warm-up, the first three games of a set being played on the same side of the court, and a shot-clock of 8 seconds between the first and second serves.
The event faced the lack of prominent players: Carlos Alcaraz and Holger Rune, both already among the top 8 players in the world, naturally withdrew, as did Ben Shelton and Lorenzo Musetti, both in the Top 20, deeming the unconventional rules less beneficial before the upcoming season.
Consequently, 19-year-old Arthur Fils [36] was seeded No. 1, considered a main favorite due to his notable ATP indoor performances earlier in the year. Despite this, in a tense final, he struggled against the exceptional serving of 20-year-old Hamad Međedović [110], the first player in the event’s history to win a five-set final. He did it not being broken. Both finalists destroyed their racquets in the process.
Interestingly, this year marks a significant moment for the Arabic Middle East as representatives from the region emerged onto the main-level. 20-year-old Abdullah Shelbayh, a ‘wild card’ entry in Jeddah, became the first man from Jordan to secure an ATP Tour match win this year (Banja Luka). Similarly, 28-year-old Benjamin Hassan, raised in Germany, but representing Lebanon, made a history for this country advancing to two ATP tournaments this autumn.

…1993…

A triumph like Petr Korda‘s at the Compaq Grand Slam Cup ’93 (December 7-12) had not occurred before and would not be replicated in the future. What sets this victory apart is not only the remarkable length of the fifth sets the champion won in his last two matches but also the caliber of players he defeated. Korda endured thrilling encounters of opposing styles (offensive baseliner vs serve-and-volleyers), overcoming day-by-day the two best players in the world at that time: Pete Sampras (13-11 in 5th set) and Michael Stich (11-9 in 5th set).
Stich’s form was exceptional towards the end of the season, outshining every other player in the Open Era comparing the last few events of the year; solely performing at home, he secured the “Masters” title (Frankfurt), led Germany to the Davis Cup trophy (Düsseldorf), and in the München final against Korda [12], he managed to save a match point with a fortunate net-cord, creating a triple break point afterward. Despite the support of the German crowd and facing a visibly fatigued opponent, luck deserted him, leading to a dramatic loss in the fifth set.
Remarkably, the most lucrative event in tennis reduced its prize money in 1993, with the champion receiving a check for $1.625 million instead of the usual $2 million awarded in the three preceding editions. It’s regrettable because considering the entire history of that specific event (1990-1999), I’d argue that no one deserved those two million dollars more than Korda.
…Finals 2023…
Jeddah (“NextGen“; $2M; hard indoors)
🇷🇸Hamad Međedović d. 🇫🇷Arthur Fils 3-4(6), 4-1, 4-2, 3-4(9), 4-1
…Finals 1993…
München (“Grand Slam Cup“; $6M; carpet indoors)
🇨🇿Petr Korda d. 🇩🇪Michael Stich 2-6, 6-4, 7-6(5), 2-6, 11-9
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 47 (Davis Cup – finals)

…2023…

After the Davis Cup structure renewal, Spain has been hosting the finals since 2019 (the initial two editions were held in Madrid, followed by another two in Málaga). However, the oldest team competition in tennis didn’t take place in 2020 due to Covid-19. This year, Spain surprisingly failed to secure a spot among the top eight teams. Nevertheless, the atmosphere remained vibrant, largely thanks to the Finnish fans who filled the Martin Carpena Arena from Fuengirola (home to the second-largest community of Finns outside Finland). The Finns emerged as a revelation in this year’s competition, yet their dream of creating an enormous sensation was halted in the semifinals by Australians who finished as a runner-up second year running.
Novak Đoković had aspirations for something extraordinary: winning the Davis Cup with Serbia in a span of thirteen years (in 2010, he did not clinch the decisive match, but he was the architect of the success). Nevertheless, his third encounter against Jannik Sinner [4] within two weeks dealt a significant blow – the Serb squandered a triple match point in a game that could have propelled Serbia into the final. Two hours later, he suffered another loss (this time in doubles) to Sinner – the 22-year-old red-haired South-Tyrolean, who’d bypassed the “Group stage” in September, emerged as an unquestionable leader of the Italian team in the “Knockout stage” – winning all three of his singles matches and, with the assistance of Lorenzo Sonego, also securing victories in two doubles matches. Matteo Arnaldi [44] – Sinner’s age-mate – made substantial contributions too, aiding Italy in reclaiming the Cup after forty-seven years (won when Adriano Panatta, the then-reigning French Open champion, led Italy to triumph).

…1993…

In week number 48 of 1993 (as week 47 was designated for the doubles ‘Masters’ event won by a Dutch pair, Jacco Eltingh and Paul Haarhuis in Johannesburg), the Davis Cup final saw the Germans employ a strategy reminiscent of the Americans three years prior. They chose to host Australia on clay, clearly an indoor setting due to the weather, aiming to neutralize the Aussie players’ serve-and-volley style. The captain from Down Under, Neal Fraser (b. 1933) had limited changes in the lineup, again depending on his most reliable clay-court player, Richard Fromberg, who has been a unique case as he participated in two Davis Cup finals despite never entering the Top 20. The selection for the second singles player was less evident; reportedly, Jason Stoltenberg was chosen despite his poor form post-US Open, allegedly due to winning a sparring session match against Wally Masur, that year’s US Open semifinalist. So the Australian team comprised singles players whose Nordic surnames hinted at their Teutonic ancestry.
Fraser’s surprising decision nearly paid off. Stoltenberg put up a highly competitive match against Michael Stich, who was in tremendous form after claiming the ‘Masters’ title. Stich’s brilliance shone in the pivotal doubles match; paired with a good partner, he defeated the most dominant pair of the ’90s, the Woodies. Despite having played seven hours in the two previous days, Stich’s match on Sunday seemed routine. He secured an early break for a 3:2 lead in the first set against Fromberg, and never looked back. Reflecting on the victory, Stich remarked: “Luckily, it wasn’t so difficult today. It has been a very long, but also a very successful year.” Respectable player of the late 60s/early 70s, Croatian Nikola ‘Niki’ Pilić (b. 1939) holds the distinction of being the sole team captain to claim the Davis Cup title with two different nations, leading (West) Germany to victory in 1988 / 89 – with Boris Becker as a team leader, 1993 – with Stich as a leader, and Croatia to triumph in 2005 – with Ivan Ljubičić as a leader, showcasing Pilić’s exceptional management across three decades and two different Indo-European languages.
…Finals 2023…
Málaga (Davis Cup; hard indoors)
Italy d. Australia 2-0
…Finals 1993…
Düsseldorf (Davis Cup; clay indoors)
Germany d. Australia 4-1
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 46 (Masters)

…2023…

Officially known as the “ATP Finals” since 2017 and hosted in Turin since 2021. This year saw two debutants, 20-year-olds Rune and Alcaraz (the Spaniard was set for his debut a year earlier but withdrew due to injury). Three decades ago, the Top 10 players were divided between serve-and-volleyers and baseliners. Today, everyone adopts a more or less similar style, leaning towards offensive baselining. The only division now considers the way players handle their backhands. Stefanos Tsitsipas, the lone one-handed backhander in the Top 10 and the 2019 champion, faced setbacks arriving in Italy. Despite his problems, he chose to compete, losing his opening match swiftly and retiring from his second after just three games. In his Green group the matches involving Jannik Sinner, Novak Đoković, and Holger Rune provided fans with gripping moments. Đoković, the primary favorite, engaged in three three-set battles, the third one against Hubert Hurkacz, who replaced Tsitsipas. Đoković’s fate wasn’t in his hands during the final group meeting. The Serb could have been eliminated had Rune defeated Sinner. At 4:3 in the third set, Rune sent his backhand return wide off Sinner’s second serve at mini-match point.
In the Red group the victories were evenly distributed among three players: Carlos Alcaraz, Daniil Medvedev, and Alexander Zverev whose elimination was decided by the ratio of sets, as he dropped three sets while the other two players lost two each. Despite his extensive experience (his fourth appearance in the season-ending championships and having reached the semifinals a year prior), Andrey Rublev struggled to make an impact, failing even to force a tie-break. Disturbingly, he seems inclined towards self-destruction, lately hitting quite regularly his left knee with the frame of his racquet, causing it to bleed.
The semifinals left something to be desired. Local favorite Sinner secured his third victory over Medvedev in recent months. However, their two previous encounters were far more intriguing. Medvedev, seemingly learning from those losses, opted for a more aggressive baseline game in the Italian semifinal, resulting in an energy drain. His performance in the third set was notably poor, marked by strange gestures directed at the spectators. In the second semifinal, Đoković outclassed Alcaraz, a disappointing outcome given their four thrilling previous encounters where victories were evenly split.
Đoković, the oldest finalist of this event with his 36 years and 181 days (previous record holder, Arthur Ashe was 35.188 at the Masters ’78 final) to some degree emulated his phenomenal semifinal performance. The 2nd set of his final against Sinner was much tighter though than the opening set as well as two sets against Alcaraz. The Serb has now won the season-ending event seven times (Roger Federer did it six times, Ivan Lendl & Pete Sampras five).

…1993…

Officially known as the “ATP Tour World Championships” in the ’90s, the event for the top eight players was hosted in Frankfurt. It ran from Tuesday to Sunday, featuring three “round-robin” matches per day. The leader of the * Arthur Ashe group, Pete Sampras, initiated his campaign on Wednesday, enjoying a two-day break after his final in Antwerp. His first match was crucial as he faced his peer, Goran Ivanišević, who had been leading 5:2 in their meetings. A bit surprisingly, Sampras won 2-1 without a tie-break set, altering the trend of their rivalry and ultimately winning 9 out of their next 10 meetings. As expected, clay-courter Sergi Bruguera didn’t secure a victory in his first “Masters” appearance, facing three serve-and-volleyers. Ivanišević’s victory against Stefan Edberg, after 2 hours and 43 minutes (the longest match at the group stage), secured his spot in the semifinals, although he had been serving to win the first two sets, only to split the tie-breaks and claim a decisive break at 4:3 in the third set.
In the Stan Smith group, there was one serve-and-volleyer (Michael Stich) and three offensive baseliners. Stich, the clear favorite on a fast court due to his fantastic autumn form indoors, and the support of the home crowd, faced an open question about the second player to advance to the semifinals. 19-year-old Ukrainian, second debutant, Andrei Medvedev proved that his final appearance in Paris was no fluke, displaying his fighting spirit again. He fought back to win two ‘lost’ matches, first against Jim Courier (saving four match points, including a triple match point at 3:5 in the decider on return!), and then against Michael Chang trailing 2-6 and *1:4. Suffering his bitter defeat, Courier astonished onlookers with two unexpected occurrences: it was the first instance in 1993 that he appeared on the court without his trademark baseball cap, and during changeovers, he engrossed himself in the novel ‘Maybe the Moon’ by Armistead Maupin.
The first semifinal was a 50-minute lesson from Sampras to Medvedev, concluding with Sampras’ 1000th ace of the season. This accomplishment made him the first man in the Open Era to surpass this number, with statistics collected since 1991. In the second semifinal, in a clash of big servers, Stich outperformed Ivanišević in two tie-breaks. While the Croat was the biggest tie-break specialist above “9-all” in the ’90s, against Stich, he lost the second tie-break 10/12, marking his longest tie-break loss throughout his career.
In the final, Sampras might have paid the price for playing five days in a row and two full consecutive weeks following his Belgian triumph. He was erratic and shockingly broken twice in the opening seven games. Although he theoretically could have won the final 3-0, it was evident he couldn’t muster the energy required to deliver his best service performance. Stich claimed the trophy, concluding the season with three indoor titles and replacing Courier as world No. 2. Not many could have expected this scenario after the US Open ’93 when Courier had a 1337-point advantage over the German… * Between 1989 and 1993, it was customary to name both groups in homage to the legendary players from the late ’60s and early ’70s.
…Finals 2023…
Turin (“Masters”; $15M; hard indoors)
🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. 🇮🇹Jannik Sinner 6-3, 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Frankfurt (“Masters”; $3M; carpet indoors)
🇩🇪Michael Stich d. 🇺🇸Pete Sampras 7-6(3), 2-6, 7-6(7), 6-2
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 45

…2023…

Unlike thirty years ago, when comparing the last week of the regular season, this year’s rivalry at the top of the game is essentially over with Novak Đoković needing just one win next week. There is no longer any place left to fight for the season-ending event in Turin. Consequently, many elite players withdrew from the last two events, and only one top-20’er decided to take part – Karen Khachanov. Left-handers prevailed in both Metz and Sofia; the best French players, Ugo Humbert and Adrian Mannarino, triumphed. What’s more interesting is they were competing to finish the year as No. 1 in their country. For the home-town favorite Humbert, his fourth ATP title in four finals (13-6 record in the finals at lower levels) means advancement to the top 20 for the first time in his career. The “Sofia Open” took place in quite bizarre circumstances. After seven years, this event disappeared from the calendar but was restored because Tel Aviv was cancelled due to the outbreak of war in the region. Two ‘wild card’ veterans, Pierre-Hugues Herbert [344] and Fabio Fognini [147], advanced to the semifinals in France, achieving their best results of the season. Herbert, who played his first ATP event in 2023, saw a dramatic fall in the rankings due to being unvaccinated (preventing him from entering several big events) and injuries, particularly a knee injury. In round two, Fognini won his 18th encounter saving a match point – more than any other active player (his peer Đoković has won 17).
The “Moselle Open” quarterfinal lineup consisted of four all-countrymen pairs (two French, one Italian, one Russian). This hasn’t occurred since Orlando 1991, when all quarter-finalists represented the United States. The 21st-century boys, Jack Draper and Alexander Shevchenko, played their first ATP finals this week. Shevchenko is a new face of 2023, while the one-year-younger Draper had already displayed significant potential a year earlier. However, the Brit, who claimed a Challenger title in Bergamo a week before, is prone to injuries and doesn’t physically handle close matches well, which was confirmed in Bulgaria; he had a double break point in the final’s last game but seemed out of gas in the rallies.

…1993…

In the second ATP edition in Antwerp, held as a point-awarded tournament from 1992 onwards (after being an exhibition event in the years 1982-1991), the focus was on two players, Goran Ivanišević and Cédric Pioline. One of them had to secure the last spot at the “Masters”. The solution was straightforward: they were on a collision course, with the Croat needing to win their quarterfinal match to automatically qualify, while Pioline required to reach the final. Pioline prevailed with a 7-6, 6-0 victory and found himself serving to beat Pete Sampras in the semifinal. The Frenchman sniffed the glory on a platter but couldn’t seal the deal. Sampras felt an extra motivation because winning the title in Flemish Belgium could secure his spot at the top of the year-end rankings, regardless of his performance the following week in Frankfurt. The American claimed his 20th title after a perfect match on Sunday. The runner-up, Magnus Gustafsson, was left disappointed after facing the third big server in a row. In the preceding rounds, he had defeated the two best Germans, Michael Stich and Boris Becker, in straight sets.
Meanwhile, in Moscow, Marc Rosset [15] successfully defended his title. This marked his third title of the season. Although not many players collected as many titles that year, Rosset was not in contention for the “Masters” (he’d very bad season at majors with an abysmal 1-3 record). There were higher expectations for him in the “best of five” format, especially after his impressive achievements in 1992, when he triumphed at the Olympics and led the Swiss team to the Davis Cup final, having defeated in both events the best man in the world – Jim Courier. In hindsight, both Pioline (b. 1969) and Rosset (b. 1970) stand out as the best players of the 90s who never participated in the prestigious season-ending event; Pioline came particularly close, falling short by just two points facing Sampras. In Moscow, two qualifiers from the former Soviet Union enjoyed a successful run: Russian Andrey Merinov [218] had the best ATP event of his career, reaching the quarterfinals while Ukrainian Dimitri Poliakov [173] advanced to the semifinals. His only better result it’s a shocking title in Umag two years earlier, also as a qualifier. Björn Borg [1148] finally played his ultimate match, perversely finishing the agony he had already begun in Monte Carlo ’83. The 11-time Grand Slam champion squandered a match point against the local favorite Alexander Volkov [17], before losing 6-4, 3-6, 6-7, and he felt that it was a performance worth to be the last on the professional circuit. Volkov, who said he used to have posters of Borg, admitted he was dissatisfied with his play. “The first set was awful, the second set was less awful, the third one was awful again,” the Russian stated.
The regular season concluded in Buenos Aires, where two Spaniards battled their way to the nearly gale final. The eventual champion, Carlos Costa, decided to make a surprising journey to South America, having spent two weeks in Europe following a flight from Asia. In the first round, veteran Diego Pérez emerged victorious, defeating Horacio de la Peña 7-6, 6-4 in the longest “2-0” encounter of the season; notably, the Uruguayan survived a marathon first-set tie-break, which ended with an astonishing 17/15 scoreline. This was the longest tie-break on clay since Jimmy Arias defeated Trevor Allan 6-2, 7-6(15) in Florence ’85.
…Finals 2023…
Metz (ATP 250; hard indoors)
(4)🇫🇷Ugo Humbert d. 🇷🇺Alexander Shevchenko 6-3, 6-3
Sofia (ATP 250; hard indoors)
(2)🇫🇷Adrian Mannarino d. 🇬🇧Jack Draper 7-6(6), 2-6, 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Antwerp ($1M; carpet indoors)
(1)🇺🇸Pete Sampras d. 🇸🇪Magnus Gustafsson 6-1, 6-4
Moscow ($325K; carpet indoors)
(1)🇨🇭Marc Rosset d. 🇩🇪Patrik Kühnen 6-4, 6-3
Buenos Aires ($275K; clay outdoors)
(2)🇪🇸Carlos Costa d. (6)🇪🇸Alberto Berasategui 3-6, 6-1, 6-4
Top 10 at the end of the regular season:
1993: Sampras – Courier – Stich – Bruguera – Edberg – A.Medvedev – Chang – Ivanisevic – Muster – Pioline
2023: Djokovic – Alcaraz – D.Medvedev – Sinner – Rublev – Tsitsipas – A.Zverev – Rune – Hurkacz – Fritz
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 44

…2023…

An exceptional line-up at the 56-draw graced this year’s Paris-Bercy, where the top 16 seeds represented the best in the world. With only three remaining spots for the “Nitto ATP Finals” (successor of “Masters”) it was a fierce competition. The semifinalist Stefanos Tsitsipas secured his place in the elite event with his 300th win, while Alexander Zverev also punched his ticket with two hard-fought victories. A remarkable new face in the best eight & Parisian defending champion, Holger Rune, joined the mix, winning two matches to claim the final berth.
The week began with three more players in contention for Turin: Hubert Hurkacz, who managed to win three matches despite weariness from Basel (he surpassed 1,000 aces in a season as the 9th player in history); Taylor Fritz, who won his first match but had to withdraw due to an abdominal injury; and last year’s Turin runner-up, Casper Ruud, being subdued in his opening match.
The veterans faced a challenging week, with players like Stan Wawrinka, Gaël Monfils, Richard Gasquet, and Andy Murray, all in their mid/late 30s, suffering heart-breaking losses, including squandered match points. Murray’s defeat was particularly bitter as he succumbed to Alex de Minaur for the second time in the fourth quarter of the season, despite leading 5:2 in the final sets. De Minaur had theoretical chances to qualify for Turin if he had won the title, but it was a long shot.
It was a tough event for the local players again. Among seven Frenchmen, only Ugo Humbert progressed to the second round, and he played a dramatic, longest match of the week, lasting 3 hours and 29 minutes, only to fall to Zverev. Paris is known for its late matches, and Jannik Sinner became a victim of this schedule. His match started after midnight and finished at 2:36 a.m. With another match scheduled in the afternoon, he had little time to recover, particularly after playing five demanding matches in Vienna the previous week, and he concluded the withdrawal would make sense for his fatigue body.
Grigor Dimitrov appeared to have played the tournament of his life. Although he had won his two big titles in 2017 (Cincinnati and London), he didn’t face a Top 10’er in Ohio and avoided the best guys in the world at the O2 Arena, which is unusual for “Masters” events. In Paris, he also notched five wins, managed to eliminate three Top 10 players, two of them in closely contested battles (6-3, 6-7, 7-6). However, he ended the week in tears as he found himself struggling in the final against one of his two toughest opponents, Novak Đoković, who claimed the Parisian title for the seventh time. Đoković’s dominance continues, and he now competes more with his own records than anyone else.

…1993…

The first week of a newly created European Union… Since the inception of the “Mercedes Super 9” in 1990 (the predecessor of the “Masters 1000”), the Paris-Bercy tournament has been held either as the ultimate event of the regular season or in the penultimate week. Nonetheless, it’s the most crucial event for securing the last spots in the season-ending event featuring the world’s top eight players. That year, with a 48-draw, there were still two berths to be secured, and the following six players were in contention: Thomas Muster (he withdrew due to injury), Richard Krajicek (he suffered a shocking second-round exit; it was later revealed that he had knee problems that sidelined him for five months), Cédric Pioline (despite being in the form of his life, he couldn’t handle the pressure of facing the French crowd favorite, Henri Leconte, in the second round), Boris Becker (he had to defend his title, but he lost in the quarterfinal to his French opponent and the partisan crowd); there were also two 193 cm tall players from newly formed Slavic countries in 1991 (Croatia in June that year and Ukraine two months later), namely Goran Ivanišević and Andrei Medvedev. They needed tie-breaks to survive their opening matches and met in the final. For Medvedev, this meant qualification to the “Masters” as the first player raised in the Soviet Union… The event marked the first time Ivan Lendl was unseeded since 1980! The Czech, representing the United States, received another blow after the draw; he had to play against one of his toughest opponents from the young generation, David Wheaton, and lost in 70 minutes without being able to create a break point. Jim Courier needed to progress two rounds further than Pete Sampras to replace him at the top of the men’s rankings but failed, losing his opening match (there was only a 31-point difference between them in the ATP rankings). In a trivia note, French players with similar surnames, Guillaume Raoux and Lionel Roux, faced each other for the first time and produced the most one-sided match of the week (Raoux won it 6-2, 6-0). The record for serve speed at the time was held by Marc Rosset, who hit 215 kph at Wimbledon a year before, however, in his third-round match, Todd Martin served 5 kph faster. The serve landed ‘out,’ so it couldn’t be counted as a new record.
In the second leg of the South American swing, Alberto Berasategui triumphed in São Paulo to claim his maiden ATP title. The 20-year-old Basque, who used the same side of the racquet for his forehand and backhand, was an underestimated revelation of the second half of the year. He was almost entirely focused on playing on clay (with an exception for the US Open), which helped him climb from no. 95 to 36, thanks to small ATP events as well as two Challengers in the process. The following year, Berasategui’s clay-court talent exploded in Paris, where he easily outplayed six consecutive opponents to reach the French Open final.
…Finals 2023…
Paris (Masters 1K; hard indoors)
(1)🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. 🇧🇬Grigor Dimitrov 6-4, 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Paris ($1.9M; carpet indoors)
(10)🇭🇷Goran Ivanišević d. (8)🇺🇦Andrei Medvedev 6-4, 6-2, 7-6(3)
Santiago ($164K; clay outdoors)
(3)🇪🇸Alberto Berasategui d. 🇨🇿Slava Doseděl 6-4, 6-3
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 43

…2023…

Since 2016, there has been a week featuring two “ATP 500” events in German-speaking cities, except for the Covid-affected years 2020 and 2021 when the “Swiss Indoors” didn’t take place. In Basel, Holger Rune and Félix Auger-Aliassime have managed to rediscover their form. Rune was grappling with a back injury, struggling to secure two consecutive wins for three months. Auger-Aliassime had knee issues, leading to a more extended slump that lasted for six months; just one week ago in Tokyo, he finally broke his bad streak by winning two straight matches. In Switzerland, they crossed paths in the semifinals, mirroring their final showdown on the same court a year prior. This marked Rune’s inaugural event under the guidance of his new coach, six-time Grand Slam champion Boris Becker, who himself triumphed in Basel thirty-one years ago. During this week, the young Dane decided to part ways with his iconic baseball hat wearing backwards, which he had sported during all his matches for over two years.
Meanwhile, Taylor Fritz, who was striving to accumulate points for the second consecutive year to qualify for the “Masters”, endured his third consecutive week of losing a match decided in a final-set tie-break. This time, his defeat was particularly painful as he came tantalizingly close to clinching victory in two different sets, before succumbing to Alexander Shevchenko, another new Russian face this season, in a nail-biting 7-6, 6-7, 6-7 contest. Fritz couldn’t convert any of his 15 break points (!) spread across six games, including a double match point (he was two points away to win in straight sets when missed an easy ball). Shevchenko experienced a roller-coaster of emotions within 24 hours, following his spectacular vuctory over Fritz, he suffered a bitter after-midnight loss to Auger-Aliassime, squandering a match point on his serve at 5:4 in the decider. The 23-year-old Canadian fought through cramps in that thriller. In the subsequent two rounds, he performed flawlessly on serve, and in the final, which remained without a break of serve, he clinched both tie-breaks with backhand return winners. The previous year in Halle, Hubert Hurkacz won their quarterfinal meeting with identical 7-6, 7-6 scoreline, where only one break point was created. “I’m definitely back. I let my racquet do the talking. That’s always been the motto of my career. I’ve had the conviction that I can be a top player since I was a kid, but there were many doubts this year about my performances and why,” Auger-Aliassime said in his on-court interview. “I’m happy that I was able to prove to everybody that I still belong among the best players in the world and that I can play at this level. I never doubted it, but it’s good to confirm it on the court.”
In Vienna, Andrey Rublev secured his spot in the “Masters” by reaching the semifinals, becoming the fifth player this year to do so. The 26-year-old Russian will be participating for the fourth consecutive year in this prestigious event. An enthralling spectacle unfolded in the final featuring Daniil Medvedev and Jannik Sinner. This marked their fourth final encounter this year, with the Russian claiming the first two, and the South Tyrolean winning the subsequent two. In the Austrian capital, Sinner’s local connection is significant, especially considering Dominic Thiem‘s decline. As a German-native speaker, Sinner might be embraced as a home favorite for this decade. After the three-hour final (with the fourth game of the third set lasting 13 deuces), Sinner addressed the packed crowd in an Austrian dialect. He has won 10 titles, as many as the best Italian of the Open Era, Adriano Panatta (French Open 1976 champion). Sinner needs a Grand Slam title to be considered better.

…1993…

The prospect of determining the year-end world No. 1 between two Americans, Wimbledon and US Open champion Pete Sampras and Australian Open winner, French Open-Wimbledon runner-up Jim Courier, was highly anticipated in the big Stockholm and Paris tournaments (a 159-point difference between them at the time). However, this dramatic scenario didn’t unfold as expected, as both Americans faced early exits in Sweden. Sampras’ second round defeat to Carlos Costa was particularly appalling because Costa was not known for his indoor prowess. Sampras, who had been riding a 12-match winning streak, admitted: “My serve was pretty erratic. I’ve served badly and still managed to win other matches this year, but not tonight.” The match, which concluded just before midnight and drew less than 500 fans, was indicative of the declining status of the “Stockholm Open,” which lost its “Mercedes Super 9” classification in 1995 due to poor attendance in the preceding years. Meanwhile, Courier faced Marc Rosset in a tight third-round match that ended 6-7, 6-3, 7-6 in favor of the Swiss. Despite the tight contest, Courier couldn’t create a single break point. Courier remarked: “I didn’t play a bad match, but I only slept four hours last night. He served so well – 24 aces. It was good for him. It’s indoor tennis, and it’s not fun for me.”
The final in Stockholm featured a clash of two exceptional 6 foot 4 indoor players, both of whom had narrowly avoided defeat in their opening matches against Swedish opponents. Michael Stich couldn’t find a way to break Goran Ivanišević for three sets, but thanks to tie-breaks he led 2-1 in sets repeating the feat he had already experienced at Wimbledon in 1991 and 1993. Ivanišević was playing second consecutive week almost every day, and being visibly tired lost his phenomenal service timing in set no. 4.
In the ’90s, there was an annual Latin Swing at the end of the season with three tournaments held in South America. In the years 1991-92, the tour stopped only on hardcourts in Brazil, including cities like Guarujá, Búzios, and São Paulo. The following year, the tour switched to clay, and included Santiago (Chile), São Paulo, and Buenos Aires (Argentina). The inaugural “Movistar’s Open” was won by unseeded Javier Frana, a left-handed Argentinian who frequently employed serve-and-volley tactics as the only South American player at the time. He defeated Emilio Sánchez in the final, marking Sánchez’s 27th and final ATP final of his career. Frana, inferior player to the Sánchez brothers in general, finished his career with positive records against them both: 2-1 over Javier, 4-1 over Emilio.
…Finals 2023…
Basel (ATP 500; hard indoors)
(6,WC)🇨🇦Félix Auger-Aliassime d. (4)🇵🇱Hubert Hurkacz 7-6(3), 7-6(5)
Vienna (ATP 500; hard indoors)
(2)🇮🇹Jannik Sinner d. (1)🇷🇺Daniil Medvedev 7-6(7), 4-6, 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Stockholm ($1.4M; carpet indoors)
(4)🇩🇪Michael Stich d. (8)🇭🇷Goran Ivanišević 4-6, 7-6(6), 7-6(3), 6-2
Santiago ($200K; clay outdoors)
🇦🇷Javier Frana d. (5)🇪🇸Emilio Sánchez 7-5, 3-6, 6-3
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 42

…2023…

Bryan (b. 1965) and Ben Shelton (b. 2002), the second active father-son combo with ATP titles, make for an intriguing tennis story. Unlike Czech Petr (b. 1968), Sebastian Korda‘s father (b. 2000), American Bryan has taken on the role of Ben’s full-time coach since June of this year. He’s been the mastermind behind his son’s recent successes. Earlier this year, Ben unexpectedly reached the quarterfinals of the Australian Open. However, he encountered a tough period afterwards, struggling to win two consecutive matches. Between the Melbourne quarterfinal loss and the first round of the French Open, he managed to win just three matches, losing twelve. This is when his father stepped in, and since then, Ben has enjoyed a 17-9 record. On the way to his maiden title in Japan (last week of the Asian swing after four weeks in China), Ben survived two challenging encounters: in the first round, he withstood a mini-match point, in the semifinals he came back from a set and a double break deficit against Marcos Giron. “That meant a lot to me and my team,” Shelton said. “We have been working really hard since the beginning to build my game and win titles on the ATP Tour. I made some deep runs lately. You see the great champions, they finish weeks off. They win titles, they don’t just get to finals. They are able to maintain their level throughout the week. I am not saying I am anywhere there yet, but to be able to do it for one week, put together five matches in a row in Tokyo is really special.” Bryan and Petr never officially met on the court, even though they spent many years on the tour together. Their sons have recently faced each other in Shanghai, and Sebastian won by a margin of two points, yet Ben is ranked higher now. 20-year-old Shintaro Mochizuki pleased the crowd with his performance. The young Japanese [215, WC] advanced to the semifinals overcoming three Top 50 players, despite having a 0-11 main-level record (three defeats come from the Davis Cup).
The past week was also noteworthy for native Russian speakers. Representatives of Russia, bulky Aslan Karatsev and Pavel Kotov [109] reached the finals, demonstrating the region’s strength in tennis, while in Antwerp, Alexander Bublik, representing Kazakhstan, claimed his second title of the year; he fired 11 aces and committed 11 double faults in the final. In Stockholm, 37-year-old Gaël Monfils [140] improved his ATP finals record to 12-22 (he has an impressive 7-1 record in finals at lower-level events) after a tense final. Monfils was two points away from a straight-sets defeat when his first serve, wide on deuce side, earned him a crucial point against his far less-experienced opponent. The beaten finalist Kotov, is a new face on the tour. Prior to 2023, he had played just half of this year’s events he participated in.
It’s essential to note that 28-year-old Nick Kyrgios, often seen as tennis’ “enfant terrible”, last year’s Wimbledon runner-up, has dropped out of the rankings due to his limited participation this year; he has played just one match in Stuttgart (last year he reached the Tokyo quarterfinal where he withdrew, and for now it’s quite possible it was the beginning of the end of his career). His future in tennis remains uncertain. On the other hand, Rafael Nadal, a potential rival of Kyrgios at Wimbledon’s semifinal last year, is currently ranked 243. Tennis enthusiasts await his return for what’s expected to be his final season next year.

…1993…

There were two indoor events in Europe. In France, Pete Sampras secured his third consecutive victory in Lyon, although this would be the last time he’d defend his title there. Unlike the previous two years, Sampras faced some tough challenges in his last two matches. He came perilously close to defeat in the semifinal (Jakob Hlasek) and had to stage a remarkable comeback in the final – trailing 1:4* (15/30) in the deciding set against the local favorite Cédric Pioline, Sampras demonstrated his champion’s mettle. However, Pioline, grappling with the emotional weight of securing his first title, couldn’t hold onto his lead. The paradox of the situation was that he had reached the indoor final for the third consecutive week, with the previous two weeks seeing him as the favorite, especially in Bolzano where he was severely beaten; in Lyon, not many believed he could upset Sampras, and it almost happened… An obscure Frenchman, Lionel Barthez [291, qualifier], who was delivering both his first and second serves at the same speed (~160 km/h), had the tournament of his life. He advanced to his only ATP quarterfinal and played a nail-biting match lasting two and a half hours, ultimately falling short. Two Top 10 Germans, Boris Becker and Michael Stich, experienced shocking first-round exits. Stich’s loss to 19-year-old Yevgeny Kafelnikov takes on a different perspective in retrospect, considering Kafelnikov’s rise to becoming one of the world’s top players, ultimately holding an 8-3 Head-to-Head record against Stich.
In the Austrian capital, Thomas Muster couldn’t realize his dream of winning both Austrian events in the same year. The task was challenging, even though he had won his sole previous meeting against Goran Ivanišević, albeit three years prior on Muster’s beloved clay. Ivanišević was a more formidable indoor player, and despite Muster enjoying tremendous support, he couldn’t secure the title. Muster had been one of the hardest-working players on the tour up to this point, and his schedule was incredibly demanding. This marked the third straight week where he transitioned between surfaces and continents. After competing on European clay (Palermo), he headed to West Asia for hardcourts (Tel Aviv) before returning to Europe to play on carpet. This arduous schedule eventually took its toll, and despite his ranking permitting participation in the “Masters” following Vienna, he was forced to withdraw from the upcoming significant events in Stockholm and Paris.
Beijing concluded the four-week Asian swing, which included Sydney. The main favorite, Michael Chang, claimed his 14th title. Yet, in the second round against Shuzo Matsuoka and in the final, he faced stiff competition from serve-and-volley players. Chang’s triumph marked his fourth Asian title in 1993. During the same week, the most prominent exhibition event of the era took place in other Chinese city (still under the British rule) – Hong Kong, the “Marlboro Championships,” boasting an incredible prize money. Twelve players were divided into four groups, leading to semifinals and ultimately the final. Richard Krajicek reigned supreme, winning all four of his matches, including a dominant victory over Stefan Edberg in the 54-minute final, earning him a staggering, optimal $1.7 million cheque. Edberg humbly apologized to the crowd, attributing his performance to a “bad day in the office.” Due to his sickness the final was shortened to “the best of three”. The next year on the same court, Edberg would find his redemption against Krajicek by defeating him in the final 6-3, 7-6, 6-3. This special Asian event, in a round-robin format, was held in the years 1990-97, only the first edition with 16 participants. Even though from a financial perspective it resembled the “Grand Slam Cup”, it attracted very little interest from the media coverage.
…Finals 2023…
Tokyo (ATP 500; hard outdoors)
🇺🇸Ben Shelton d. 🇷🇺Aslan Karatsev 7-5, 6-1
Antwerp (ATP 250; hard indoors)
(3)🇰🇿Alexander Bublik d. (4)🇫🇷Arthur Fils 6-4, 6-4
Stockholm (ATP 250; hard indoors)
(PR)🇫🇷Gaël Monfils d. (q)🇷🇺Pavel Kotov 4-6, 7-6(6), 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Lyon ($575K; carpet indoors)
(1)🇺🇸Pete Sampras d. (5)🇫🇷Cédric Pioline 7-6(5), 1-6, 7-5
Vienna ($275K; carpet indoors)
(2,WC)🇭🇷Goran Ivanišević d. (1)🇦🇹Thomas Muster 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 7-6(3)
Beijing ($275K; carpet indoors)
(1)🇺🇸Michael Chang d. 🇨🇦Greg Rusedski 7-6(5), 6-7(6), 6-4
Hong Kong [$5.4M (!); ehxo – hard outdoors]
(2)🇳🇱Richard Krajicek d. (1)🇸🇪Stefan Edberg 6-1, 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 40-41

…2023…

In recent years, Novak Đoković‘s primary focus has been on winning Grand Slam titles rather than retaining the world No. 1 ranking. The Serbian tennis legend chose to skip the entire Asian swing this season. After a four-year hiatus due to the extended effects of the Covid-19 pandemic in Asia, professional tennis made its return to Shanghai, but in a new format. This marked the first time that the tournament extended over two weeks, allowing for an expanded draw from 56 to 96 players.
The event witnessed a flurry of upsets. Notably, among the Top 15 players in the world, only one managed to reach the quarterfinals – Andrey Rublev, who eventually finished as the runner-up. The semifinal lineup was comprised of four players who are native Slavic speakers (Russian, Bulgarian, Czech & Polish).
In an exciting final, Polish player Hubert Hurkacz, coincidentally on the day of parliamentary elections in Poland, emerged victorious. Hurkacz showcased his resilience as he saved a match point with a powerful serve. His path to victory was aided by a favorable draw. Before the semifinals, he defeated four consecutive opponents who could have participated in a strong Challenger tournament. This included a victory over the local favorite, Zhizhen Zhang, who arrived in Shanghai after clinching the gold medal in the Asian Games held in Hangzhou. Hungarian Fábián Marozsán [91], one of Hurkacz’s victims, is worth mentioning because he has just played five main-level events, already reaching 4th round in his Roman debut, and the quarterfinal in China, having defeated top 10 players in both events, thus it’s not super risky to put forward a thesis that he would achieve more than the current best Hungarian of the 21st Century, Márton Fucsovics… Poor weather conditions in Shanghai led to the last few matches being played under a closed roof and it was reflected in good results for players who prefer faster conditions. Thanks to the injection of 1000 ranking points, Hurkacz now unexpectedly finds himself in contention for a spot at the season-ending event in Turin. In the Singles Race rankings, he made a significant leap from No. 16 to No. 11. With his second Masters 1000 title (previous in Miami two years ago), Hurkacz has effectively settled the debate over ‘who is the best Polish player in the Open Era’ surpassing Wojtek Fibak, who was the champion of 15 titles at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s… The hottest players at the end of 2022 lately suffer big crisis: Holger Rune has a 1-7 record since Wimbledon while Félix Auger-Aliassime 1-8 since Roland Garros. Despite the slump, the young Dane is still in a good position to play in Turin.

…1993…

Sydney witnessed an unexpected turn of events as Jaime Yzaga, a Peruvian player who was nearly 26 years old and ranked 54th at the time, emerged as the tournament champion. Yzaga, who stood as the shortest player in the Top 100 at 170 cm (weaker in hierarchy Olivier Delaître the same height), was predominantly known for his performances on clay or outdoor hardcourts. Therefore, it was quite surprising that he managed to defeat four Top 20 players consecutively under the Australian roof. His quarterfinal victory over Jim Courier was particularly remarkable, and versatile Yzaga himself acknowledged it as the best win of his career. Although he didn’t go on to play another ATP final following this tournament, in 1994, he matched his career-best Grand Slam result by reaching the quarterfinals of the US Open, with an even more valuable victory over Pete Sampras in the fourth roundJonathan Canter [284], a forgotten US player who had won an event in Melbourne ’85, drifting in the Satellites, suddenly reached the quarterfinals at the age of 28 as a qualifier, and was within a few games from stunning Wayne Ferreira in straight sets. Notably, Canter had not won an ATP match since 1990, making the quarterfinal run a shocking feat, and his “swan song”.
In southern France (Occitania region), a delightful event unfolded for local fans. Two 24-year-old Frenchmen faced off in the final, and Arnaud Boetsch, who enjoyed much more support from the crowd, outlasted Cédric Pioline in a 2-hour and 42-minute battle. Interestingly, the year before, they had also faced each other in the same event, with Boetsch emerging as the quick winner in round two. Previously, two French players met in the final in Bordeaux ’91.
Jordi Arrese, the Olympic silver medalist ranked 88th, did not meet expectations throughout 1993, primarily focusing on his beloved clay courts. However, in the Greek capital, where the tournament had been held from 1986 to 1994, he managed to capture his sixth and final title. On his path to victory, Arrese survived two matches that were decided in the third-set tie-breaks. This tournament highlighted a period when Greek tennis meant a catastrophe; there were no “Hellenes” performing even at the Challenger level. Consequently, in that year, the organizers granted ‘wild cards’ to two unranked Athenians, both over 30 years (!): Konstantinos Effraimoglou and Georgios Kalovelonis. These obscure players, despite a lack of competing at similar level for years, avoided losing sets to ‘love’. Arrese defended his title, a year before winning an all-Spanish affair too. Quite peculiar that he finished the year playing twelve consecutive three-setters, initiated that streak in Greece.
Ivan Lendl, widely regarded as the greatest player of the 1980s, secured his final title as a 33-year-old defending champion at an event in Japan. This victory marked a positive turnaround in Lendl’s season. Despite entering the tournament on an 11-tie-break losing streak, the Czech-American managed to win two consecutive matches where deciding third-set tie-breaks were required. Lendl triumphed in the Seiko Super Tennis for the fifth time. He held a special affinity for Japan, not only for its unique culture but also because a Japanese company (Mizuno) crafted tennis rackets tailored specifically to his preferences.  Greg Rusedski, who was ranked 130th, had previously won a title in Newport that year, and reaffirmed his potential to be a challenging opponent on faster surfaces. The Canadian, who would become a British citizen two years later, advanced to the semifinals after defeating three Top 20 players in a row, with each match featuring dramatic three-setters where he was on the brink of losing.
Jonathan Stark [57], an American player two years older than Rusedski, delivered an incredible serving performance (~50% of points directly behind the serve in his last two matches) in the largest city of South Tyrol. Stark nearly lost in the opening round against the defending champion but then breezed through another four matches, including a dominant victory in the final over Cédric Pioline – the only seed in the last eight. Although Rusedski would go on to achieve more successes at the end of the Century; in the mid-90s, both he and Stark appeared to be at the same level as one-dimensional big-servers. Stark’s willingness to regularly play doubles may have contributed to block his development in singles (he became the best doubles player in the world in 1994). Similar story with other US player, David Pate, who belonged to the fastest servers in the late 80s, but put an emphasis on his doubles career. 18-year-old Thomas Johansson (Aussie Open champion nine years later) received a ‘wild card’ being unranked and advanced to the quarterfinal where he played a competitive match!
A remarkable match took place in the Tel Aviv quarterfinal, where Andrey Cherkasov defeated Andrea Gaudenzi 6-7, 7-6, 7-5 after 3 hours and 54 minutes (the Russian withstood three match points). This contest was the longest “best of three” match in ATP history until 2009 when Rafael Nadal overcame Novak Đoković after a 4-hour battle. In the meantime, Nadal had equaled Cherkasov’s record in the first week of 2008. The Tel Aviv title went to Stefano Pescosolido, an intriguing player who ended his career with a notably low win/loss ratio (40%) and never broke into the Top 40 in the rankings. Despite these statistics, Pescosolido claimed two titles in only two final appearances, defeating higher ranked Jewish players: American Brad Gilbert in Scottsdale ’92 and Israeli Amos Mansdorf in Tel Aviv.
…Finals 2023…
Shanghai (Masters 1K; hard semi-indoors)
(16)🇵🇱Hubert Hurkacz d. (5)🇷🇺Andrey Rublev 6-3, 3-6, 7-6(8) – 1 m.p.
…Finals 1993…
Sydney ($875K; hard indoors) – week 40
🇵🇪Jaime Yzaga d. (6)🇨🇿Petr Korda 6-2, 4-6, 7-6(4), 7-6(7)
Toulouse ($375K; hard indoors)
(5)🇫🇷Arnaud Boetsch d. (2)🇫🇷Cédric Pioline 7-6(5), 3-6, 6-3
Athens ($175K; clay outdoors)
🇪🇸Jordi Arrese d. (3)🇪🇸Alberto Berasategui 6-4, 3-6, 6-3
Tokyo ($875K; carpet indoors)week 41
(9)🇺🇸Ivan Lendl d. (10)🇺🇸Todd Martin 6-4, 6-4
Bolzano ($290K; carpet indoors)
🇺🇸Jonathan Stark d. (2)🇫🇷Cédric Pioline 6-3, 6-2
Tel Aviv ($175K; hard outdoors)
🇮🇹Stefano Pescosolido d. (2)🇮🇱Amos Mansdorf 7-6(5), 7-5
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment