The History of Men's Tennis (Open Era)

Born: June 2, 1981 in Severodonetsk (Ukrainian Voroshilovgrad Oblast in Soviet Union)
Height: 1.79 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Николай Владимирович Давыденко… stumbling over his own feet, showing signs of frustration when nothing critical had happened, hesitating to challenge calls even when TV spectators could see it was worth it, retiring without signs of injury, delivering serves with a regular, unthreatening pace, and even hitting two-handed volleys – sometimes from positions where a traditional overhead would have been the obvious choice. Watching these moments in Davydenko’s career, you might wonder: how did this humble guy born in Ukraine, tennis-wise educated in Germany, representing Russia, who went bald in his early 20s, become a solid Top 5 player for several years and a multiple Grand Slam semifinalist?
The short answer can be summed up by Juan Martín del Potro‘s famous remark after losing to him in the 2009 ATP Finals, the first edition of this event in London: “He plays like PlayStation.” If you only focus on Davydenko’s more awkward moments, you miss the bigger picture – he was a player who operated on the baseline like a well-oiled machine.
Davydenko once said he admired Polish ski-jumper, the best in the world in the early 2000s, Adam Małysz, who attributed his success to focusing solely on making a good jump. In tennis, it’s more challenging to concentrate only on yourself, as you’re constantly interacting with your opponent, but this focus was something Davydenko aimed for throughout his career. His game plan was simple: don’t think about the opponent across the net, keep high percentage of first serve in, stay close to the baseline, run fast, and hit clean, flat strokes off both wings as soon as the ball bounced. This straightforward, high-speed approach was remarkably effective, even against players like Rafael Nadal, who struggled to adjust to Davydenko’s relentless pace. Davydenko defeated Nadal twice in Masters 1K finals (Miami 2008 and Shanghai 2009), also winning their dramatic Doha ’10 final. The first of Davydenko’s three Masters 1K titles comes from Paris-Bercy 2006 – the last edition on carpet.
But while this method worked against Nadal, it didn’t against Roger Federer. The Swiss maestro, with his ability to vary spins and slice, could outmaneuver the Russian’s baseline game. Federer repeatedly frustrated Davydenko on the big stages, knocking him out of major tournaments six times, including two quarterfinals (Australian Open 2006 and 2010) and three semifinals (US Open 2006 and 2007, French Open 2007). Davydenko could often push Federer to 5-all in sets, but the Swiss almost always found a way to play tense sets better, it was a mental thing between them as “Kolya” admitted. In hindsight, Davydenko might rightfully think: <If I hadn’t met Federer so many times, I would have been a Grand Slam champion>. Davydenko lost four major semifinals (only Tim Henman lost more – six – never advancing to the final). Ironically, he had the best chance in his first semifinal when he faced Mariano Puerta at the 2005 French Open. The Russian was two games away from victory in the decider, but the Argentine coped better with the tight finish line. In hindsight, we know Puerta was probably playing that match under the influence of illegal substances.
That long-awaited breakthrough finally came at the 2009 ATP Finals in London, where Davydenko was in top form, having an impressive 18-5 record in tie-breaks leading into his semifinal against Federer. Perhaps that confidence helped him remain calm when he faced 0/30 while serving at 4:5 in the deciding set. For the first time in 13 attempts, Davydenko beat his nemesis, winning 6-2, 4-6, 7-5. “I had to hit fast and aggressive strokes and keep the points on my racquet. I stepped on the court, felt the ball, and did everything I could to finish it in straight sets. I was nervous during match point, and the emotions just burst out after I won,” Davydenko reflected. After 12 straight losses to Federer, he finally had his revenge.
Davydenko finished 2009 in style and carried that momentum into 2010, where he started the season by defeating both Federer and Nadal en route to winning the Doha title. By the time he entered the 2010 Australian Open, many pundits considered him a genuine title contender. He could realistically believe in achieving something similar to what Andrés Gómez (French Open 1990) and Petr Korda (Australian Open 1998) had done – claiming maiden Grand Slam titles late in their careers. And for a set and a half in his quarterfinal against Federer, Davydenko dominated, looking like he might pull off another upset. But Federer, ever the problem solver, rallied to win the match 2-6, 6-3, 6-0, 7-5. It was the last time Davydenko would reach the second week of a Grand Slam.
The final four years of his career were reminiscent of the first four – he often found himself eliminated in the early rounds. Doha 2013 marked the last time he reached an ATP final, where he came just a few points from the title. Despite the loss, he finished his career with an impressive 21-7 record in finals. For a stretch in the mid/late-2000s, Davydenko was a force to be reckoned with (fruitful period began as he triumphed in Moscow ’04), even if his flashes of brilliance were often overshadowed by more awkward moments. Unusually, Davydenko didn’t break into the Top 10 until he was 24, an age when many players who finally reach that level often enjoy just one or two standout seasons. Yet, once he got there after changing his style from a counter-puncher into an aggressive baseliner, he stayed for a remarkably long time, defying the trend seen in those who usually break through earlier in their careers.

Career record: 482-329 [ 346 events ]
Career titles: 21
Highest ranking: No. 3
Best GS results:
Australian Open (quarterfinal 2005-07 & 10)
Roland Garros (semifinal 2005 & 07; quarterfinal 2006 & 09)
US Open (semifinal 2006-07)
Davis Cup champion 2006
Masters champion 2009

Born: September 6, 1974 in Oxford (South East in England)
Height: 1.85 m
Played: Right-handed

Some encounters separate the men from the boys, and for Henman, such a match occurred in the first round of Wimbledon ’96 against the newly crowned French Open champion, Yevgeny Kafelnikov, on Centre Court. Although they were peers, Kafelnikov was far superior at the time – he had already established himself as “the man,” while Henman was seen as a boyish-looking player, admired for his classical style but perceived as perhaps too fragile, physically and mentally, to win the big titles. In that skirmish, with a supportive home crowd behind him, Henman showed grit a couple of times and sensationally prevailed in five sets, suddenly becoming a national hero in Great Britain. His subsequent matches at Wimbledon ’96 captured immense public interest. It was a tournament full of surprises, and when Henman reached the quarterfinals, he was even seen as a potential champion, although he ultimately lost to Todd Martin. Nonetheless, that tournament made him a new tennis star and cemented his lifelong association with Wimbledon. After Wimbledon ’96, it was obvious that Henman would have a better career than the most accomplished British player born in the 1960s, Jeremy Bates, who waited until he was almost 32 before winning his only title. Henman captured his first title at the age of 22, in Sydney.
A phenomenon called “Henmania” accompanied his appearances at the most prestigious tennis event from then on, lasting until 2004, his most mature and consistent year when he reached the French Open and US Open semifinals for the only time in his career; the best period, in fact, began in late 2003 when he triumphed at Paris-Bercy – his biggest career title. Between 1996 and 2004, Henman was Wimbledon’s biggest attraction (in 2005, the British hopes shifted to teenage Andy Murray), reaching the semifinals four times and the quarterfinals another four times. The closest he came to fulfilling his Wimbledon dream was in 2001 when he lost an epic, three-day semifinal to Goran Ivanišević – being just two points away from what felt like a “failed destiny.”
Henman was often the victim of tough draws. In 1998 and 1999, he faced the best grass-court player of the ’90s, Pete Sampras, and although he played well, the details made the difference in both four-set losses. In 2002, another wild Wimbledon – first time in history dominated by players mainly operating on the baseline – he quickly lost in the semifinals to Lleyton Hewitt, who was ruthless against attacking players in the early 2000s. Ironically, the other semifinal that year featured David Nalbandian against Xavier Malisse …both of whom Henman would have been heavily favored against.
Some might call Henman an “underachiever”, as he is a leader of the most Grand Slam semifinals without reaching the final, had he not won Paris-Bercy in 2003. In hindsight, that title was remarkable, considering how players like Nikolay Davydenko and Roger Federer developed afterward. Henman’s semifinal win over Andy Roddick, who was the best player of that season, should be recognized as a huge victory. After so many disappointments in native Britain (he failed to conquer Queens Club too, once being very close in three finals), it was the French capital that Henman broke through. In the final, he faced Andrei Pavel, who had shocked everyone with his successful week shortly after the comeback from injury. “It’s been an unbelievable week for me,” Henman said after the final he won convincingly, as expected. “If you’d have told me six months ago that I’d win this title, I’d have probably thought you were smoking something.”
In terms of style, Henman was a prototype of the early Federer. His classic game and frequent use of backhand slices often drew comparisons to Stefan Edberg and Patrick Rafter. However, unlike those multiple Grand Slam champions, Henman wasn’t a consistent serve-and-volley attacker, even on grass during the era when it was the norm. Perhaps this more measured approach explains Federer’s early struggles against Henman – the Brit won six of their first seven meetings (the only loss coming when Henman retired) including one final (Basel). To some extent, Federer was losing to a more experienced version of himself. But by 2004, as Federer adjusted his style to become more of a defensive player, the Swiss turned the tables, winning their last six matches without dropping a set, including two almost identical finals (Indian Wells ’04, Tokyo ’06) – the last finals in Henman’s career, he finished it with a negative record losing 17 out of 28.

Career record: 496–274 [ 273 events ]
Career titles: 11
Highest ranking: No. 4
Best GS results:
Roland Garros (semifinal 2004)
Wimbledon (semifinal 1998-99, 2001-02; quarterfinal 1996-97 and 2003-04)
US Open (semifinal 2004)

Born: February 12, 1980 in Ontinyent (Valencia)
Height: 1.82 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

When J.C.Ferrero first appeared on the ATP tour at the end of the last century, I remember being surprised by the buzz around him. Someone, somewhere – whether I read it or heard it – wrote/said that he was part of a group of talented youngsters born in the early 80s, and he would soon become the best in the world. That comment stuck with me because I didn’t see anything special in his game, either technically or in his on-court behaviour, which was reserved, rather dispassionate…
Ferrero’s introduction to the ATP circuit was explosive. In his debut tournament in Casablanca ’99, he reached the semifinals as a qualifier, riding a 24-match winning streak (five in Morocco, including qualifying… after 19 consecutive victories on the Satellite circuit). He soon claimed his first Challenger title (Napoli) and made a deep run at the ATP event in Barcelona, where he took Carlos Moyá – then one of the world’s top players – to a dramatic third round contest, the first of many thrillers between them.
From 2000 to 2003, Ferrero dominated the clay courts. He reached two successive French Open semifinals (2000 and 2001), both times losing to Gustavo Kuerten, but won more matches on clay than anyone else in those four years, claiming titles in Monte Carlo (2002, 2003) and Rome (2001) as well as leading the Spanish team to the first Davis Cup trophy. In 2002, he made the third all-Spanish French Open final but lost in an unusual match against five years older Albert Costa. Twelve months later, however, Ferrero triumphed in Paris, defeating surprise finalist Martin Verkerk and sealing the win with his trademark shot – a blistering forehand from the middle of the court. His friends called him “Mosquito” due to his speed and stinging forehands, which he could unleash from any angle.
Ferrero’s backhand was super solid, his volley technique impeccable, and his serve improved as he bulked up, all of which helped him reach the pinnacle of the sport. The best period of his career (lasting roughly 15 months) began with the Masters ’02 final. After his French Open ’03 triumph, Ferrero found himself in the elite company of Andy Roddick and Roger Federer, battling for the top spot in the rankings. At the US Open ’03 and a few months later in Madrid, Aussie Open ’04 too, he proved that it would be unfair to call him a “clay court player” because he achieved quite impressive results on hard courts.
What separated Ferrero from older clay-court specialists from Spain, who played in the same era, like Àlex Corretja, A.Costa, and Félix Mantilla (all three used to play one-handed backhands), was his ability to win tight, dramatic matches on a regular basis. Before losing the Rotterdam final in February 2004, Ferrero had won three consecutive matches in deciding tie-breaks. By that point, he had already survived 10 match point-down matches in over 100 main-level events, an extraordinary stat that underscored his endurance as well as the capability to play his best tennis when it mattered the most.
However, after Rotterdam, things began to unravel. In Marseille, Ferrero shockingly lost to French journeyman of offensive attitude, Gregory Carraz, and soon after, he contracted a highly contagious disease. “I found out yesterday I had the chickenpox,” Ferrero said after withdrawing from Indian Wells and Miami ’04. “Sometimes things happen, and you can’t do anything about it. I’m disappointed because I was looking forward to playing here in the States.” Later on that season he injured his ribs and right wrist.
The illness and injuries weakened his body, and though he returned to the clay-court swing in 2004 skipping just Barcelona and Rome, he never fully regained the confidence that had once made him one of the most feared players in the world. By the end of 2003, Ferrero was ranked No. 3, having briefly held the No. 1 spot after winning the US Open semifinal, where he showed he would claim at least one title in Melbourne and New York. But by the end of 2004, he had fallen to No. 31.
…and this is what I mentioned at the beginning of this bio – I perceived the young Ferrero as someone who would achieve as much as he ultimately did in the years 2004-2012. In those years he played just one ‘Masters 1K’ final (Cincinnati ’06) and two major quarterfinals, ironically at Wimbledon, on a surface that seemed to be his weakest during his peak years… Ferrero currently coaches Carlos Alcaraz, he actually created him, and he may achieve everything with his pupil that he could have expected to achieve himself if chickenpox hadn’t struck him in that unlucky year of 2004.

Career record: 479–262 [ 268 events ]
Career titles: 16
Highest ranking: No. 1
Best GS results:
Australian Open (semifinal 2004; quarterfinal 2003)
Roland Garros (champion 2003; runner-up 2002; semifinal 2000-01)
Wimbledon (quarterfinal 2007, 09)
US Open (runner-up 2003)
Davis Cup champion 2000 and 2004 (played only doubles in the final)

Born: February 22, 1972 in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Height: 1.73 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Joe, 張 Chang’s father, moved from Taiwan to the United States in 1966. Six years later, Michael Te-Pei Chang was born as the younger brother of Carl Chang (b. 1969), who was a successful junior player. When Carl realized that Michael was better than him, he decided to complete his university studies (San Dieguito High School in Encinitas) and then became his younger brother’s coach. Carl was awarded wildcards in a few ATP events, and even advanced to the main draw after qualifying once, but finished his career with a 0-5 singles record (4-20 in doubles, playing 17 out of 20 tournaments with Michael, which was meant to help improve Michael’s volley skills).
Back to Michael – he was a prodigy. Despite his modest height (165-168 cm as a teenager), he was able to beat much taller boys from higher age groups. At the same time, Franco Davín was Chang’s counterpart in South America. [ Unlike Chang, Davin fell into mediocrity on tour but enjoyed successes as a coach, with Gaston Gaudio and Juan Martín del Potro winning Grand Slam titles under his guidance ]. As a 13-year-old boy (looking younger than his age), Michael was already winning events for 16-year-olds. There were three key factors that made him an exceptional teenager: sturdy legs, high tennis IQ, and, most importantly, an unbelievable fighting spirit. The young Chang epitomized the “never say die” attitude. Every point, game, and set mattered to him, and he played every match from start to finish with 100% physical and mental dedication.
At just 15, Chang claimed his first Challenger title. It was his debut at that level, though he had already played four events at the main-level. At the 1987 US Open, Chang became the youngest player (15 years, 6 months) to win a main draw match in the history of the event, defeating veteran Paul McNamee. “When things around me get to be too much,” said Chang, “My parents take me away. We relax or go fishing, take my mind off everything.”
A year later, Chang captured his first tour title in San Francisco at just 16 years and 7 months. “I just hope that a lot of young kids who can relate to me because of my age will look up to me,” Chang stated after defeating Johan Kriek in the final. “I hope that I will never be conceited and will remain humble because nobody is going to like you if you give them a hard time.”
At the 1988 French Open, many 18-year-olds were still playing in the juniors, such as Venezuelan Nicolas Pereira (b. 1970), a brilliant junior player who never made it big on tour but defeated Stefan Edberg, Boris Becker, and Thomas Muster. Meanwhile, 16-year-old Chang, already reached the third round in the main event. One year later he improved in Paris being seeded 15th in the main draw; advanced to the fourth round (he had reached that stage at the US Open ’88 too), where he was scheduled to play on Centre Court in Paris for the first time to get another valuable lesson against three-time champion and the dominant player of the decade, Ivan Lendl. As expected, Chang lost the first two sets, but instead of bowing out in the third, he staged one of the most memorable comebacks in tennis history, using all the tools at his disposal, including the famous underarm serve and standing near the service line for Lendl’s serve! Chang went on to win three more matches (another five-setter in the final against Edberg) and became the youngest Grand Slam champion in history at 17-years, 109 days old!
What was remarkable, though, was that despite his early triumph, Chang never won another major title in the next 14 years. He didn’t capture any of the biggest titles, either from a prestigious (Slams, Masters) or financial point of view (Grand Slam Cup). So how could that be, considering Chang improved significantly over the years?
Two factors may explain this phenomenon:
– Chang’s victory at the French Open came just before a shift in men’s tennis when a group of big servers, led by Pete Sampras, emerged. Before Sampras fully developed his serve, he was regularly losing to Chang – both in juniors and during the early years on tour;
– over time, Chang lost some of his greatest assets: his speed, steely determination, and knack for improvisation
As Chang’s game evolved, he notably upgraded his serve. His average aces per match increased significantly: 1.9 in 1991, 2.7 in 1992, 3.1 in 1993, 4.3 in 1994, 6.0 in 1995, and 8.4 in 1996. A racquet (Prince) an inch longer than a traditional one helped him improve his serve. During those years, Chang played in six really big finals, including the Grand Slam Cup of the years 1991–92 (losing to big-serving David Wheaton and Michael Stich), the Masters final ’95, and the Australian Open final ’96 (both losses to Becker). His most crucial match, however, was the 1996 US Open final, where he lost to Sampras. If he had won that match, Chang would have become the world’s No. 1 player. The only opponent who didn’t overwhelm Chang with an imposing serve-and-volley game in these biggest finals was Muster at the 1995 French Open. Muster won that baseline duel after coming back from a big deficit in the opening set, a feat he repeated many times that year.
Chang could still handle big servers, but it was more challenging for him in a best-of-five format. Nevertheless, he collected seven Mercedes Super 9 titles, all on outdoor hard courts in North America. Indian Wells was his favorite tournament, and he won it three times (1992, 1996–97). Twice he triumphed in Cincinnati (1993 and 1994), once in Toronto (1990) and once in Miami, known as Key Biscayne at the time (1992).
Many players reach their peak around age 25, but for Chang, that age marked the beginning of his decline. He was exhausted at such a young age after ten years of playing at the highest level. The 1997 US Open was the last tournament where Chang was considered a genuine contender for a Slam title. He lost in the semifinals to Patrick Rafter, who was not a big server, but on that day, his serve was enough to dominate the match. After this defeat, Chang failed to reach the fourth round of a Grand Slam tournament for the remaining six years of his career.
After retiring, Chang withdrew from the spotlight for several years before returning as the coach of “fellow Asian” player Kei Nishikori. In some sense, with Nishikori, Chang experienced a similar trajectory to his own career in the 1990s: although they worked together from 2014 to 2019, Nishikori lost all his biggest finals (one Slam and four Masters 1000 events). Chang, in his best years, always wanted to highlight his Asian roots (faith in God too) and preferred playing in Asian events rather than flying to other parts of the world, where he could earn more, money and points.

Career record: 662–312 [ 330 events ]
Career titles: 34
Highest ranking: No. 2
Best GS results:
Australian Open (runner-up 1996; semifinal 1995 & 97)
Roland Garros (champion 1989; runner-up 1995; quarterfinal 1990-91)
Wimbledon (quarterfinal 1994)
US Open (runner-up 1996; semifinali 1992 & 97; quarterfinal 1993 & 95)
Davis Cup champion 1990

Born: September 23, 1988 in Tandil (Buenos Aires)
Height: 1.99 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Del Potro had one of the most unusual careers among players born in the 1980s. He missed almost the entire 2010 season (playing just three events that year), and then faced further interruptions in 2014 and 2015 (appearing in only six events across those two years). His third lengthy break stretched from June 2019, being ranked 12th, when he withdrew from the second round at Queen’s Club, until February 2022. When he returned for a farewell match, he was No. 737, retaining a ranking despite not competing for so long due to the COVID-related “frozen” rankings system. The first two absences resulted from a chronic left wrist injury, while the third break which actually ended his career, was due to a fractured kneecap. What’s quite intriguing about Del Potro’s successful results following his two comebacks after the wrist injury is his adaptation to a different playing style. Unable to hit his two-handed backhand with the same power as in his early years on tour, he compensated by developing a very effective slice, improving his net game, and making his forehand – already known as a powerful shot – even more lethal from 2011 onwards.
It’s a shame that injuries marred his career because when he took his first long break (January 2010), he had just won the US Open and reached the final of the first season-ending ATP Finals in London. He had already beaten Roger Federer (twice) and Rafael Nadal (three times) at their peak. At that time, it wasn’t certain that the “Big 4” would dominate for so long; instead, it could have been a “Big 5” or a different configuration altogether, as Del Potro had the potential to claim more victories in key matches against Novak Đoković and Andy Murray. His impressive ground-strokes and surprising agility for a player standing two meters tall made him a serious contender from the start of his career.
Interestingly, Del Potro wasn’t super tall as a young teenager; his height spiked as he began competing professionally, but initially he didn’t adjust his game to his stature, particularly his serve. Unlike other tall players who often rely on a powerful serve and forehand combination, Del Potro became known for his devastating forehand (paired with a solid, but not dominant, serve) which he employed effectively after patient rallies.
The year 2008 marked a breakthrough for him. Previously known for tight match losses, he matured, cut his ponytail, and adopted a more composed demeanour. This transformation led to a 23-match winning streak in the summer, earning four titles on two different surfaces (German-speaking cities: Stuttgart & Kitzbühel on clay, American ones: Los Angeles & Washington on hard) and reaching his first major quarterfinal. Despite this progress, he continued to lose to the world’s best. Another turning point came in Miami 2009 when he outlasted Nadal 6-4, 3-6, 7-6 in the quarterfinals, having trailed 0:3 with two breaks in the third set (he would later defeat Nadal in a similar manner at the 2016 Rio Olympics). This victory was significant not only because it marked his first win over a top player, but also due to the dramatic circumstances; it was the second in a series of ten straight matches he won with a deciding set tie-break, so it’s an obvious indicator the Miami victory over Nadal strengthened him mentally.
After claiming his first major title at the 2009 US Open, Del Potro stood on the Arthur Ashe Stadium court and told Federer: “I had two dreams this week. One was to win the US Open and the other one is to be like Roger. One is done, but I need to improve a lot to be like you. You fought until the final point. You are a great champion. I’m very happy to be here with this crown, with these people, on this court. This will be in my mind forever.” Indeed, nothing surpassed that moment for another, tormented ten years of his career, but he managed to play another US Open final in 2018 (the same year he finally won a Masters 1K title – Indian Wells). The 2009 victory in New York City was even more impressive considering that nine months earlier, Federer had defeated him 6-3, 6-0, 6-0 (!) at the Australian Open and beaten him again in the French Open semifinals.
DelPo always demonstrated a strong desire to represent Argentina. At the 2012 Olympics, he earned a bronze medal despite losing a heart-breaking semifinal to Federer – the longest three-set match in history. Four years later, he went one better, securing silver in Rio de Janeiro. He also endured defeats in two Davis Cup finals (2008 and 2011) as Argentina lost to Spain, with him narrowly losing crucial matches on both occasions. The third time was the charm in 2016, as he won two epic matches, the longest ones in his career, away from home – one against Murray in Scotland in the semifinals and another against Marin Čilić, his contemporary with a similar skill set but a healthier career, in the final in Croatia. De Potro and Čilić faced each the for the first time as 14-year-old boys at the Orange Bowl.

Career record: 439-174 [ 192 events ]
Career titles: 22
Highest ranking: No. 3
Best GS results:
Australian Open (quarterfinal 2009, 2012)
Roland Garros (semifinal 2009 & 2018; quarterfinal 2012)
Wimbledon (semifinal 2013; quarterfinal 2018)
US Open (champion 2009; runner-up 2018; quarterfinal 2008, 12 & 16)
Davis Cup champion 2016 (won two rubbers in the final)
Olympics: silver medal (Rio 2016), bronze medal (London 2012)

Born: May 22, 1981 in Vienna
Height: 1.82 m
Plays: Left-handed (two-handed backhand)

For typical Open Era players (by “typical,” I mean those born since the 50s), it was quite natural to play singles and doubles in the same events. This trend began to shift towards specialization for players born in the 70s; however, a few players from that generation (Yevgeny Kafelnikov, Jonas Björkman, Patrick Rafter) still managed to reach the Top 5 in both singles and doubles. Among players born in the 80s, barely Melzer achieved very good results in both disciplines for a longer period of time (other left-hander Michaël Llodra, four days older than Melzer, is the only player comparable) allowing him to reach the Top 10 in each, and he did so when approaching his 30th year.
Melzer was the best Austrian player between the eras of Thomas Muster and Dominic Thiem, though not at their level. Like them, he achieved his best result in Paris (Thiem improved his Parisian efforts in New York). It was Roland Garros 2010: Melzer hadn’t progressed beyond the third round in singles in any of his previous 31 major attempts, so he could be very happy just reaching the quarterfinal against Novak Đoković, who was already established as a member of the Big 3. For Melzer, reaching the major quarterfinal was two rounds better than his previous best at this level. The end of the road seemed inevitable as the Serb led 6-3, 6-2, 2:0, but Melzer staged one of the most impressive comebacks of the decade at Roland Garros, winning a thriller on Suzanne Lenglen after 4 hours and 15 minutes, being five points away from defeat in sets 4 and 5. That victory is even more impressive in retrospect, given Đoković’s incredible record in five-setters. It marked a turning point in the career of the 29-year-old Austrian even though he had no chance in the semifinal.
The same season, he advanced for the first time to the fourth round at Wimbledon and the US Open and also defended his title in hometown Vienna, having defeated Rafael Nadal in his previous event (Shanghai), from start to finish playing arguably the best match of his life. Melzer’s journey to the Top 10 continued in the following season – he reached the round of 16 in Melbourne for the first time, followed by his lone Masters 1K semifinal in Monte Carlo after defeating Roger Federer. That win over Federer (6-4, 6-4) marked the end of Melzer’s great form, which spanned a non-calendar year. Following in the footsteps of several gifted players, he experienced a period of about ten months of consistency at the highest level, but in his case, it was stretched over two seasons, which meant he didn’t play in the ‘Masters’ tournament. Paradoxically, he won his arguably biggest title (Memphis 2012) nearly a year after the Federer victory, at a time when he was struggling to win two consecutive matches.
Melzer was among the most offensive players who used a two-handed backhand (Wimbledon and US Open doubles champion along with Philipp Petzschner during his two best years). He often played backhand dropshots using both hands – a rarity, with Nikolay Davydenko being one of the few other players to do so, with the right hand as the leading one as opposed to Melzer. Unlike Davydenko’s two-handed backhand volley, Melzer’s backhand volley was a very classical stroke. I would consider his cross-court (inside-out included) forehand to be his best shot. Playing a lot of doubles helps players improve cross-court returns, so there were a few technical aspects of Melzer’s game that made him a tricky opponent at the turn of the 2000s and 2010s. Certainly, a lack of a win against Andy Murray in their seven meetings is a missing element in the Austrian’s legacy. In their second encounter (third round of the US Open 2008), Melzer was just two points away from a straight-sets victory.
Trivia: Melzer faced his peer Federer for the first time after spending eleven years on the tour together (Wimbledon 2010). Their rivalry ended at 4-1 in favor of the Swiss. Melzer also managed to avoid being a whipping boy when facing Nadal and Đoković, finishing his career with a 1-3 record against each of them. Melzer’s younger brother, Gerald Melzer, who is nine years his junior, never came close to matching Jürgen’s achievements. However, he has made his mark in tennis history by being part of the longest two-set match ever recorded, losing two tie-break sets in Kitzbühel 2016 after an intense 2 hours and 53 minutes.

Career record: 350-334 [ 312 events ]
Career titles: 5
Highest ranking: No. 8
Best GS result:
Roland Garros (semifinal 2010)

Born: December 27, 1984 in Nice (Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur)
Height: 1.83 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

The most remarkable week of Simon’s career occurred during the 2008 Madrid Masters 1000 event (the last edition on hardcourts indoors). At 23 years old, Simon had already spent four seasons on the ATP tour, but his knack for winning tight matches hadn’t yet turned many heads. What made this week extraordinary was his ability to win four matches decided by final-set tie-breaks, in spite of winning only one match of this kind at the ATP level before. Even more astonishing, Simon navigated multiple super tough situations, repeatedly escaping near-defeat: he saved triple match point against Igor Andreev and double match point against Robby Ginepri. He also overcame deficits in the deciders against Ivo Karlović (down *0:3) and Rafael Nadal (down 2:4*), the latter being his most impressive career victory. That marathon semifinal against Nadal lasted 3 hours and 23 minutes, with Simon also on the verge of losing the second set. Even though he seemed to be totally spent, Simon created a double set point in the final against Andy Murray, pushing his limits in a gruelling encounter. [ The skinny Frenchman waited six years to play his another final at this level, in Shanghai. ] Simon’s tremendous fighting spirit was first noted in 2006, his first full ATP season, when he overcame strong players like Nicolás Massú (Aussie Open) and Tomáš Berdych (Monte Carlo) despite cramping in the deciding sets. This resilience became one of Simon’s trademarks throughout his career, allowing him to grind out tough matches even when physically compromised. A testament to his patience and tenacity was strongly evident for example at the Australian Open in 2013, where he engaged in one of the longest rallies in history, lasting 72 strokes nearly two minutes, against Gaël Monfils, and ultimately defeated his compatriot under five hours struggling with his right forearm.
From technical point of view, Simon’s hallmark was his backhand. Unlike most two-handed players who occasionally mix in a slice, Simon almost never used one, relying instead on fantastic anticipation and timing to thrive in long baseline exchanges. However, this style had its downside, as his backhand volley response to well-executed passing shots left something to be desired. In my view, Simon was a “poor man’s Murray.” Their approach to the game: endurance, flat ground-strokes, and strategic point construction – was similar, but Murray generally edged Simon in every facet of the game, particularly in serves and backhand volleys. This explains Simon’s 3-16 (ten straight defeats one-sided) Head-to-Head record against Murray, despite their stylistic similarities.
Simon’s last two years, coinciding with the post-COVID period, were marked by very poor performances, but in his final season, he found the inner spirit to win two dramatic first-round matches in Paris against much higher ranked opponents, pleasing the home crowd – first at Roland Garros against Pablo Carreño Busta (trailed *2:4 in the 5th set), and later against his nemesis Murray at Paris-Bercy (trailed 4-6, 3:5*).
With a wink: if Simon was a “poor man’s Murray,” then Andreas Seppi was a “poor man’s Simon.” The eleven months older Italian from South Tyrol met Simon six times and never managed to come away with a win. Both players rank in the Top 10 for most main-level events played in the Open Era. In my opinion, both Simon and Seppi could be considered among the best players born in the 1980s, if the underarm serve had been part of the rulebook as a necessity while dropshots and attacking the net forbidden.
Simon’s consistency over the years, his ability to perform well on all surfaces, and his frequent appearances in major tournaments between 2006 and 2020 make it surprising that he never reached a Grand Slam semifinal (he only played two quarterfinals: Aussie Open ’09 and Wimbledon ’15). Despite his modest Slam record (very good percentage-wise though: 60%), Simon won an impressive number of ATP titles throughout his career. In fact, he captured as many titles as two more famous French compatriots, Henri Leconte and Cédric Pioline combined. His title at Hamburg ’11 is arguably the biggest of his career, as it held ATP 500 status. Notably, he was undefeated in the Romanian capital, Bucharest, during three trips there within six years, with his last victory there coming in 2012 when he built a remarkable 10-2 record in the ATP finals.

Career record: 504-394 [ 398 events ]
Career titles: 14
Highest ranking: No. 6
Best GS results:
Australian Open (quarterfinal 2009)
Wimbledon (quarterfinal 2015)

Born: March 7, 1960 in Ostrava (MoravskoSlezský kraj in Czechoslovakia)
Height: 1.88 m
Plays: Right-handed

He was undoubtedly the best player of the 1980s and an icon of that decade, the prototype of the 21st century athlete who knows how important physical preparation is, though in the early ’80s, it wasn’t certain he would establish himself as the king of tennis. While he was branded a top player at the turn of the ’70s and ’80s, he struggled to confirm his tremendous potential at the majors. At the time, no one knew that the reigning king, Björn Borg, would soon quit the sport. By January 1982, Lendl had already secured two important titles – Davis Cup in 1980 (along with Tomáš Šmíd) and the Masters ’81, as well as captured a title defeating Borg in five sets (Basel ’80) which was very telling about his capabillities; nonetheless he still hadn’t won a major, something essential for cementing his legacy.
Lendl’s path was longer than that of Andre Agassi, who, a decade later, would achieve similar successes at a younger age. Lendl famously lost his first three major finals (French Open ’81, US Open ’82 and ’83) being defeated by the legends of the 70s after balanced matches, with the fourth defeat being particularly surprising: he succumbed the 1983 Australian Open final in straight sets to Mats Wilander, a clay-court specialist, in a match few expected him to lose. When he faced his biggest nemesis of the ’80s, John McEnroe, in the 1984 French Open final, Lendl seemed destined to suffer a fifth defeat in a major final. McEnroe, in incredible form, easily won the first two sets. However, the 24-year-old Lendl, now a seasoned competitor, made a remarkable comeback to win his first Grand Slam title.
That victory was the culmination of the ‘Ivan the Terrible’ form he’d shown at the turn of 1981/82, when he won 44 consecutive matches, most of them indoors, barely sweating with an impassive expression on his face. By 1985, Lendl had truly reached the top of the tennis world, beating McEnroe once again in the spotlight, this time in the US Open final. That victory signified the end of McEnroe’s dominance – shortly after, ‘BigMac’ shockingly withdrew from the tour for seven months, never returning to his peak form.
With McEnroe and Borg both out of the picture, Lendl faced new challengers in the mid 80s: the teenage serve-and-volleyers from Northern Europe, Stefan Edberg and Boris Becker, as well as a bit older than them, baseliner Wilander. These three would become Lendl’s toughest opponents in the late ’80s, replacing the Americans in matches of contrasting game-styles: serve-and-volleyer McEnroe (Edberg, Becker) and baseliner Jimmy Connors (Wilander), who had dominated the first half of the ’80s. Connors had initially won the first eight matches against Lendl, but by 1984, the tables turned. After their final encounter in Tokyo that year, where Connors led their Head-to-Head 13:5, Lendl never lost to him again, winning 17 consecutive matches! Remarkably, Connors came close to victory only once during this streak – at the 1984 Masters, bravely fighting also at Key Biscayne ’87.
Lendl was a pioneer in terms of the off-court preparation. Guided by Dr. Robert Haas, he revamped his diet in the early ’80s, cutting red meat in favor of pasta, soup, vegetables, and water. This change improved his stamina and footwork, allowing him to position himself better for shots. To combat his mental struggles, he worked with psychologist Alexis Castorri, even taking ballet and aerobics classes. With the help of Wojtek Fibak (the Pole at the twilight of his career), Lendl transformed his backhand from a defensive slice into a powerful topspin shot, and modified his service motion, landing on left foot instead of right. Later, he teamed up with former Aussie champion Tony Roche, whose insights, particularly as a left-hander, helped Lendl improve volleying, understand how to better compete against rivals like McEnroe and Connors.
Lendl finished four seasons as the world’s top player, though 1985-87 was the peak of his dominance. He ended 1989 ranked No. 1, though many felt that year belonged to Becker, who won two majors (beating Lendl at Wimbledon – semifinal, and the US Open – final) and led West Germany to a Davis Cup title defence. Had Davis Cup points counted towards rankings (it happened between 2009 and 2015), Becker would have finished the year as No. 1.
One of Lendl’s most impressive achievements came at the 1987 US Open, where he defeated his three toughest rivals of the early/mid ’80s – McEnroe, Connors, and Wilander – in consecutive matches to claim the title. The final against Wilander had an impact on tennis rules because it highlighted the excessive length of matches at the time; after playing four sets (one bagel!) through 4 hours and 47 minutes, officials decided to reduce the time allowed between points from 30 to 20 seconds at Slams starting in 1990…
Like Borg before him, Lendl built his game around powerful serves and forehands. However, unlike Borg, Lendl’s modern equipment allowed him to hit flatter, faster shots. His serve was exceptionally tactical, often varying its pace to keep opponents off balance. Notably, Lendl was notorious for starting matches slowly, often playing at 70-80% of commitment in the first few games before taking control later in the set. His running forehand down the line was a standout shot, arguably the best in tennis history. Opponents frequently attacked Lendl, as they couldn’t match him from the baseline, which gave him ample opportunities to showcase his curved passing shots on the run.
As a player who grew up in the ’70s, Lendl naturally attacked the net on faster surfaces. Indoors, he could dictate points on his own terms, but on grass, he had to adapt by serving and volleying regularly. This wasn’t his strongest area, and while his volleying skills were very good by today’s standards, they weren’t good enough to win him the most prestigious title – Wimbledon. Despite skipping the 1990 clay-court season to focus on grass, and astonishingly winning Queens Club by outplaying McEnroe and Becker, Lendl fell short at Wimbledon, losing in the semifinals to Edberg, a natural grass-court player in peak form.
Even as he aged, Lendl remained dangerous thanks to his obsession to keep the body in shape, but at the beginning of 1993, he was clearly slipping. His biggest rivals of the late ’80s – Becker and Edberg – were still in their primes, while a new generation of American players (Pete Sampras, Jim Courier and Agassi) began to take control; Courier never won a set against Lendl in four meetings though. At the 1990 US Open, Lendl lost to Sampras in the quarterfinals, marking a defining moment in the changing of the guard in tennis. This loss prevented Lendl from playing the US Open final for the ninth consecutive year. Lendl loved playing in New York City; he’d participated in nine consecutive ‘Masters’ finals before Edberg stopped him in the semifinals of 1989. Lendl became a U.S. citizen in 1992, reflecting his desire to distance himself from his Czechoslovak roots and embrace a new identity in a country where he felt he could truly belong. It was too late to play the Davis Cup, at least he briefly represented USA at the Hopman Cup ’94. By that year, Lendl’s major appearances were underwhelming. His last match came at the 1994 US Open, where he lost in the second round to Bernd Karbacher (4-6, 6-7, 0-1 ret.) leaving the court with a back injury after wasting a *5:0 lead in the 2nd set, and nine set points! It was a stark reminder that his body was no longer able to withstand the rigours of the technologically enhanced tour (improved graphite racquets increased the serve speed and also allowed to generate massive top-spins in the early 1990s).
Lendl retired quietly, choosing not to make an official announcement but simply stepping away from the sport. After nearly two decades in the background, he returned to tennis in 2011 as Andy Murray’s coach, helping Murray win two Wimbledon titles and fulfilling, in part, the dream Lendl never achieved as a player.
While Lendl’s lack of a Wimbledon title remains a gap in his otherwise stellar career, his reign in the ’80s was indisputable. Natural movers forwards like McEnroe (1983), Pat Cash (1987), Becker and Edberg may have stopped him at Wimbledon in his top form, but his sheer consistency, fitness, and relentless pursuit of improvement made him one of the greatest players in tennis history, and distinguish grass-court player too.

Career record: 1068–242 [ 320 events ]
Career titles: 94
Highest ranking: No. 1
Best GS results:
Australian Open (champion 1989-90; runner-up 1983 & 91; semifinal 1985, 1987-88; quarterfinal
1992)
Roland Garros (champion 1984, 86-87; runner-up 1981 & 85; quarterfinal 1983 & 88)
Wimbledon (runner-up 1986-87; semifinal 1983-84, 1988-90)
US Open (champion 1985-87; runner-up 1982-84, 88-89; semifinal 1991; quarterfinal 1980, 90 &
92)
Masters champion 1981-82, 1985-87
Davis Cup champion 1980 (contributed in singles & doubles)
World Team Cup champion 1981

Year-end rankings 1978-94: 74 – 20 – 6 – 2 – 3 – 2 – 3 – 1 – 1 – 1 – 2 – 1 – 3 – 5 – 8 – 19 – 54

Born: October 10, 1979 in Viña del Mar (Valparaíso)
Height: 1.81 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Massú took his first steps on the tennis court under the tutelage of his maternal Jewish-Hungarian grandfather. Massú, whose paternal lineage traces back to Lebanese and Palestinian origins, enjoyed a prolific junior career (crazy genetic heritage?). In 1998, when Marcelo Ríos ascended to the world’s top ranking, sports journalists were already heralding Massú and Fernando González as his potential successors.
While Ríos’ younger compatriots may not have eclipsed his ranking achievements, Massú carved out a unique niche in Chilean tennis history. He stands alone among the trio as the recipient of one of tennis’ most coveted prizes – an Olympic gold medal. His triumph in Athens in 2004 ignited debates about the greatest player in Chilean history: Ríos captured the most ATP titles, González collected the most medals (the only player in history with gold, silver & bronze, and has the best resume given major events), but neither has won a title as significant as Massú. These three distinctive players triumphed at the World Team Cup ’03, Ríos wasn’t a member of the team when Chile defended the title.
Massú’s Olympic feat was nothing short of extraordinary. Not only did he clinch gold in singles, but he also partnered with González to secure the top spot in doubles. Both finals were nail-biting five-set encounters, resolved within a breathtaking 24-hour span. This unprecedented double-gold performance transcended tennis, etching Massú’s name into the annals of sports history for decades to come.
In the culminating matches of the tournament, Massú vanquished American players who were also experiencing career-defining moments. However, the magnitude of Massú’s accomplishment is further amplified by his earlier victories over former world No. 1 players Gustavo Kuerten and Carlos Moyà. What makes this achievement even more astounding is that Massú arrived in Athens on the heels of eight consecutive hardcourt losses. The fact that these Olympic triumphs represent his sole hardcourt title in singles and his only doubles title overall underscores the miraculous nature of that unforgettable week.
Massú was renowned for his tenacity and indefatigable fighting spirit. He frequently emerged victorious from seemingly insurmountable deficits, particularly in the ‘best-of-three’ format. He did it even in the finals: Buenos Aires 2002 and Palermo 2003. His approach to the game suggested a preference for marathon matches – the longer the contest, the more it suited his style. Curiously, this mental fortitude didn’t fully translate to major tournaments, where he maintained a negative record, even on the clay courts of Roland Garros. It’s really staggering that a player of his calibre, played a fourth round at Slams just once – US Open ’05 when he lost a 4-hour-32-minute marathon to Guillermo Coria leading 2-1 in sets, yet he didn’t have chances for victory in the last two sets. Massú accused Coria of faking an injury during the match.
During the 2000s, no other player was involved in as many protracted matches as Massú. He was notorious for stretching the time between serves to the maximum allowed (25 seconds in ATP events and 20 seconds in majors at that time). After the first few pro years of being primarily associated with clay courts, he surprised many by reaching the final of the indoor Madrid tournament. This result undoubtedly bolstered his confidence on harder surfaces, culminating in his glorious performance in Athens. As Massú approached his 29th birthday, he began to encounter the physical limitations that often challenged professional athletes before turning 30. The final five years of his career saw him primarily competing at the Challenger level, where despite his efforts, he was unable to reclaim a position within the Top 100 rankings which would allow him to participate in the biggest events. As a coach, he helped Dominic Thiem achieve a career-best result, the ’20 US Open title.
Trivia: Massú holds the distinction of playing the longest four-set “tie-break” matches, both occurred in Davis Cup against less accomplished players: in 2007, he succumbed to Dudi Sela of Israel 3-6, 4-6, 7-6, 4-6 in an epic 5-hour, 7-minute battle; two years later, he prevailed over Austrian Stefan Koubek in a marathon lasting 5 hours, 14 minutes, creating a unique situation that these two players have played the longest match of their careers, finished in 4, not 5 sets… Massú is the first player in history to officially ask for a Hawk–Eye challenge, it happened at the beginning of his match against Raemon Sluiter in Miami 2006. Three years before they faced each other in an Austrian final.

Career record: 257–238 [ 225 events ]
Career titles: 6
Highest ranking: No. 9
Best GS result:
US Open (fourth round 2005)
Olympic Gold medalist in singles and doubles (Athens 2004)
World Team Cup champion 2003 and 2004

Born: March 24, 1975 in Linköping (ÖsterGötland)
Height: 1.79 m
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

The Grand Slam champions from Sweden and their number of titles are as follows:
11 – Björn Borg, 7 – Mats Wilander, 6 – Stefan Edberg…
and 1 – Thomas “ToJo” Johansson, who is not related to Joachim “Pim-Pim” Johansson (the US Open ’04 semifinalist). Despite producing many distinctive players in the 80s and 90s, Sweden only saw “ToJo” joining the three great Swedes: Borg, Wilander, and Edberg as a Grand Slam titleholder. Johansson first caught my attention in 1993, as an unranked 18-year-old ‘wildcard’ (he had been recognised as a big talent already four years earlier becoming the best European under 14), when he defeated the experienced Karel Nováček, then ranked No. 17, in Bolzano. He made it to the quarterfinals, where he lost a close three-setter to Andrey Olhovskiy. Such an impressive debut – without any prior experience in Challengers or Satellites – was absolutely astonishing, and I thought he would become an extraordinary player.
I first saw him on TV in 1995, playing against Michael Stich in Vienna, a few months later against Boris Becker in Melbourne and Goran Ivanišević in Munich. However, in these three matches he didn’t make much of an impression on me, even though he won the first two sets against Becker, known as a slow-starter though. Then, in May 1996, Johansson surprised many, including myself, by dismantling Henri Leconte 6-1, 6-1, 6-4 in the Frenchman’s farewell match on Centre Court in Paris. Seeing the young, humble Swede win so convincingly in such a significant match, with the entire stadium against him, was unexpected. If someone had told me then that he would become a Grand Slam champion, I wouldn’t have believed it. He seemed too reserved, too timid to capture the biggest titles.
I always appreciated Johansson’s powerful first serve (considering his relatively modest height) and his ability to perfectly hit ground-strokes down the line from both wings. Struggling to close out tight matches could have easily dashed his hopes of ever reaching a major final. “It’s the worst what could happen. I would prefer to lose 2-6, 2-6, 2-6” said the devastated Swede after a heart-breaking quarterfinal loss at the US Open ’98. Nonetheless, more than three years later, he seized his opportunity in Melbourne, aided by fortunate circumstances (Andre Agassi‘s withdrawal, a favorable draw in the second week, and Marat Safin‘s infamous birthday party a night before the final). He stunned the tennis world by lifting the Australian Open ’02 trophy, becoming one of the most surprising Grand Slam champions in history. “I was only 24 years old, so for me, it was a huge title,” Johansson reflected on his first widely acclaimed success at the 1999 Canadian Open, a victory that undoubtedly gave him the confidence to truly believe in winning a major event. “All of the best players in the world were there. It was like an approval that if I played my best tennis, I could compete with the best. Beating Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Jim Courier, two big champions, was just amazing.” Until the end of his career, Johansson was unable to replicate his Montreal and Melbourne achievements, but he did play some of his best tennis in Autumn ’04, when he defeated Agassi in the final in Stockholm.
Two other notable results following his Australian glory, were reaching the Wimbledon ’05 semifinal and earning a silver medal in doubles at the Olympics the year before. Considering the generally strong performances of Swedish players on clay courts over the decades as well as Johansson’s super solid baseline strokes, it is inexplicable that he never reached the third round at Roland Garros in eleven appearances, and took part in only one ATP semifinal on clay (which occurred when his opponent decided not to play the quarterfinal due to injury). Johansson finished his career with a disappointing 35% win rate on clay.
Trivia: in January 2004, he made another unranked run to an ATP quarterfinal, in Adelaide, following knee surgery that had sidelined him for the entire 2003 season.

Career record: 357–296 [ 288 events ]
Career titles: 9
Highest ranking: No. 7
Best GS results:
Australian Open (champion 2002)
Wimbledon (semifinal 2005)
US Open (quarterfinal 1998 and 2000)
Davis Cup champion 1998 (didn’t play in the final)
World Team Cup champion 2008