Points won by each set: | 23-33, 25-18, 32-20 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
33 % Hewitt – 25 of 72
29 % Enqvist – 23 of 79
# The same players in the Adelaide final second successive year and similar progress like a year before, yet reversal outcome. Hewitt [25] led *2:1 in the 3rd set when saved a triple break point. The teenage Australian had played third consecutive finals in his hometown! Enqvist [4] was in a great form at the time, it seemed he would be No. 1 player soon, but with that lost final, his great form disappeared.
Hewitt’s route to his 4th title:
1 Mark Woodforde 6-3, 2-6, 6-1
2 Dejan Petrovic 6-0, 6-2
Q Jason Stoltenberg 6-2, 6-2
S Nicolas Escude 3-6, 6-1, 6-4
W Thomas Enqvist 3-6, 6-3, 6-2
# Comparison of their back-to-back Adelaide finals: 1999: Enqvist d. Hewitt 4-6, 6-1, 6-2… 1 hours 30 minutes… Total points: 89-67 2000: Hewitt d. Enqvist 3-6, 6-3, 6-2… 1 hours 30 minutes… Total points: 80-71
Points won by each set: | 23-33, 25-18, 32-20 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
33 % Hewitt – 25 of 72
29 % Enqvist – 23 of 79
# The same players in the Adelaide final second successive year and similar progress like a year before, yet reversal outcome. Hewitt [25] led *2:1 in the 3rd set when saved a triple break point. The teenage Australian had played third consecutive finals in his hometown! Enqvist [4] was in a great form at the time, it seemed he would be No. 1 player soon, but with that lost final, his great form disappeared.
Hewitt’s route to his 4th title:
1 Mark Woodforde 6-3, 2-6, 6-1
2 Dejan Petrovic 6-0, 6-2
Q Jason Stoltenberg 6-2, 6-2
S Nicolas Escude 3-6, 6-1, 6-4
W Thomas Enqvist 3-6, 6-3, 6-2
# Comparison of their back-to-back Adelaide finals:
1999: Enqvist d. Hewitt 4-6, 6-1, 6-2… 1 hours 30 minutes… Total points: 89-67
2000: Hewitt d. Enqvist 3-6, 6-3, 6-2… 1 hours 30 minutes… Total points: 80-71