Points won by each set: | 31-20, 32-20 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
35 % Edberg – 16 of 45
22 % Bruguera – 13 of 58
[1] Edberg’s magical performance at the net. Especially between *2:3 in the 1st, and 3:0 (30-all) in the 2nd set, the Swede was playing amazing tennis in offence: volleys, smashes, dropshots – everything worked his favour when he was approaching the net. It was a revenge for a sensational defeat to Bruguera [39] during their previous meeting, also in Paris (Roland Garros ’90). The 19-year-old Spaniard was a shocking semifinalist on carpet, because he had been known as a clay-courter, yet he found his way to win four consecutive matches in deciding sets (Leconte, Gomez, Rosset, Raoux)… In hindsight a title match for Edberg (photo with trophy) because his final opponent Becker was injured and retired after just six games in the “best of five” format.
Points won by each set: | 31-20, 32-20 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
35 % Edberg – 16 of 45
22 % Bruguera – 13 of 58
[1] Edberg’s magical performance at the net. Especially between *2:3 in the 1st, and 3:0 (30-all) in the 2nd set, the Swede was playing amazing tennis in offence: volleys, smashes, dropshots – everything worked his favour when he was approaching the net. It was a revenge for a sensational defeat to Bruguera [39] during their previous meeting, also in Paris (Roland Garros ’90). The 19-year-old Spaniard was a shocking semifinalist on carpet, because he had been known as a clay-courter, yet he found his way to win four consecutive matches in deciding sets (Leconte, Gomez, Rosset, Raoux)… In hindsight a title match for Edberg (photo with trophy) because his final opponent Becker was injured and retired after just six games in the “best of five” format.