The History of Men's Tennis (Open Era)

…2023…

Very strong field in Rotterdam… Jannik Sinner [14] was unseeded, and it created a unique situation that in 2R two players met, who presumably finish several years together in the Top 10 this decade: Sinner, with surprising ease, avenged four straight defeats to Stefanos Tsitsipas – the Greek has a decent chance to become No. 1 in the world in April (especially if Novak Đoković is forced to skip the Indian Wells/Miami combo). Daniil Medvedev [11] captured the title easily, he admittedly dropped two sets, but all ten required sets he won having big advantage over his opponents… The revival of Dutch tennis is noticeable, for the first time since 2003 two Dutchmen advanced to the Rotterdam quarterfinals (both ‘wild cards’). There were years in the 90s with 4-5 players from the Netherlands in the Top 100, in the previous decade Robin Haase was hanging alone in it, and currently there are two Top 50 blondes, wearing caps everywhere, with bizarre surnames: Botic van de Zandschulp (“of the sand shell”) and Tallon Griekspoor (“Greek track”, semifinalist this week). Two other guys who may advance to the Top 100 soon: Tim van Rijthoven and Gijs Brouwer (quarter-finalist this week).
Carlos Alcaraz [2] returned to action after a 3.5-month break in Buenos Aires. He wasn’t rusty since the first points, lost a set in his opening round, against a clay-court specialist who played his best tennis at the final stages of that set. The runner-up Cameron Norrie [12, first player to lose two finals this year; drops to 4-9 in finals] surprised me choosing the Golden Swing, but I think it’s a consequence of the Davis Cup – Britain played as a guest in Colombia, and Norrie apparently decided to stay in South America for a month. “I felt very comfortable playing the final,” Alcaraz said post-match. “I knew that it was going to be really difficult. I started really focused on what I had to do at the beginning, my game, my level. This is the level that I have to play in finals.” I suspect the shortest Top 100 player, 30-year-old Diego Schwartzman [32] is done after four years in the Top 20. The Argentine has won just 1 of his last 11 matches, fighting for every point for so many years finally takes its toll. Playing in front of the local crowd it was a very good opportunity to reverse the unfavourable fate, yet he was destroyed in both Argentinian events by inferior opponents.
Florida… Matija Pecotić [784], the 33-year-old Croat who wasn’t known even as a Challenger player, became the second oldest player to win a maiden ATP match. He went through the qualifying event and stunned in the first round Jack Sock who has been struggling with injuries since 2018 and plays sporadically. The title captured the main favorite Taylor Fritz [7] who has been playing tie-breaks with fantastic efficiency lately, 12-1 record (16-1 including a December Exhibition in Saudi Arabia). At Delray Beach, Fritz added another two tie-breaks. “The fans especially, the turnout was incredible and it makes me really proud to be an American playing at a home event, with many people in the stands.” said Fritz after the final in which he wasted a match point in the 2nd set. Thanks to this title, he has secured No. 5 in the world next Monday.

…1993…

Michael Stich [11], the Stuttgart titlist, was extremely lucky that he survived the second round match: he was trailing 4:5* (15/40) in the 3rd set against the Olympic gold medalist Marc Rosset. The Swiss player, known for his unconventional behavior, decided to finish the match with an ace and committed two double faults in a row risking his second serves! Stich was also lucky that two top seeded players, his potential opponents in back-to-back matches, withdrew during the event: Petr Korda (upset stomach) and Boris Becker (fever). Especially avoiding Becker was very beneficial because at the time German fans loved Becker instead of Stich (it’d slightly change at the end of the season) and one week before Becker destroyed Stich in Milan. In the final the local umpire (Peter Richter of Stuttgart) helped Stich a bit. Richard Krajicek fired an apparent ace saving the first match point, but the linesman called it out. Richter didn’t intervene. On Krajicek’s second serve Stich played a perfect forehand passing-shot. One year before they played similarly tight match in the Australian Open quarterfinal. Then triumphed Krajicek, he also won their third and last five-setter, another Stuttgart final (in 1995). “I would have been happy with much less money because I’ve been waiting for an ATP victory for a long time,” said Stich, commenting a big winner prize in the second richest ATP event of the season (only “Masters” offered more that year). At 5-all in the decider against Krajicek, Stich withstood two mini-match points with volleys.
Pennsylvania… Derrick Rostagno [91] could increase his level facing top players, and he benefited from Jim Courier‘s tiredness after exceptionally demanding previous week in Memphis. Rostagno stunned the No. 1 in the world in straight sets, snapping his 12-match winning streak, and it was an important moment of the season because Pete Sampras reaching the semifinal that week, began to chase his one year older compatriot. The doubles specialist Mark Woodforde [44] captured his 4th and the biggest singles title. He took advantage of Ivan Lendl‘s retirement in the 62-minute final. Lendl lost the first point of the 10th game (thanks to that Woodforde edged 40-39 in total points) and decided to quit… he suffered a pulled muscle on his left side just below the rib cage. Woodforde almost avoided playing a match point also against Rostagno in the semifinal because an angry American slammed a ball towards the umpire, he could be disqualified, but only got a penalty point. Their shake-hand was very awkward, similar to the one I observed after the Delreay Beach ’23 quarterfinal between Mackenzie McDonald & Michael Mmoh.

…Finals 2023…

Rotterdam (ATP 500, hard indoors)
(6)🇷🇺Daniil Medvedev d. 🇮🇹Jannik Sinner 5-7, 6-2, 6-2
Delray Beach (ATP 250, hard outdoors)
(1)🇺🇸Taylor Fritz d. (4)🇷🇸Miomir Kecmanović 6-0, 5-7, 6-2
Buenos Aires (ATP 250, clay outdoors)
(1)🇪🇸Carlos Alcaraz d. (2)🇬🇧Cameron Norrie 6-3, 7-5

…Finals 1993…

Stuttgart ($2,125M, carpet indoors)
(6)🇩🇪Michael Stich d. (5)🇳🇱Richard Krajicek 4-6, 7-5, 7-6(4), 3-6, 7-5
Philadelphia ($575K, hard indoors)
🇦🇺Mark Woodforde d. (4)🇺🇸Ivan Lendl 5-4 ret.

...2023…

When I looked at the draws in Dallas & Cordoba, I thought that all-American and all-Argentinian finals were probable. In Texas 15 of 28 players were Americans, in Cordoba 10 of 28 were Argentinians – the two top seeds were local players in both events. In Cordoba indeed – the final was an all-Argentinian affair, but in Dallas the 23-year-old Wu Yibing [97] spoiled the party. In his last two matches, Wu trailed 6-7, 4:5 (0/30) against the local players, but found his way to victory not showing many emotions. In the almost three-hour final against John Isner [39], he saved four match points in total; one in the 2nd set, and another three in the deciding tie-break (Isner had the ball in play on each occasion, one of those MPs he should have won with a volley). I was wondering for many years how it was possible that such a huge, rich country like China, having ATP events since 1996, couldn’t produce at least one Top 100 player. Now China has two guys in the Top 100 and Wu’s potential is much bigger than that. His baseline game is impressive, I especially like his cross-court forehand, he’s able to accelerate the ball effortlessly. Last year he became the first Chinese to win a Grand Slam match in the Open Era, now he becomes the first one to claim an ATP title (no Chinese before him even played a semifinal). He’s some sort of a late-bloomer because he couldn’t play tennis for two and a half years (due to elbow, lower back, shoulder and wrist injuries) after successful junior career.
It’s a rarity to claim an ATP title with only three wins, that’s the case of Jannik Sinner [17] – the Italian had ‘bye’ first, then received a walkover in 2R, another three matches he won quite easily in the southern French city. The France-born US representative, Maxime Cressy [51] is the only current Top 100 serve-and-volleyer, but his style is unique, actually incomparable with anyone from the past. The almost two-meter-tall player hits 1st and 2nd serves with similar power which oscillates around 180-210 kph. Double digit of double faults in his three-set matches is calculated into his style. Arthur Fils [163] reached the semifinal in his second ATP appearance. The 18-year-old Frenchman (first player born in 2004 to win an ATP match) defeated two very experienced players, he’s certainly a man to watch. The defending champion Alexander Bublik [50] has lost nine straight matches. Facing a match point in the deciding 3rd set tie-break, he was so frustrated that devastated three racquets at the change of ends.
Sebastian Baez [47], the titlist in Cordoba, prior to the event had won just 1 out of his last 18 matches! He’s the second shortest player (170 cm) in the Top 100, his chances outside clay are limited, yet his shorter compatriot Diego Schwartzman (168 cm) found his way to be dangerous on faster surfaces too. The beaten finalist, 30-year-old Federico Coria has just played 2 ATP finals, his ten years older brother Guillermo Coria, had played the first two ATP finals already as a teenager… It’s been 22nd year of the Golden Swing, a series of clay-court events held in Latin America; in 2001 the first mini-tour led through Vina del Mar (Chile), Buenos Aires (Argentina), Costa do Sauipe (Brazil) & Acapulco (Mexico); this year players from Cordoba move to Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) & Santiago (Chile).

…1993…

In his first years on the tour, Sergi Bruguera [17] was associated almost entirely with clay-courts, in Milano he reached his first final outside clay; it was a prognostic of things to come, he improved his serve and strengthened ground-strokes, it’d help him to win two major titles soon. In the first round he barely survived, but another three matches won against very good indoor players. He had no chance in the final though, facing the best indoor player at the time. For Boris Becker [4] it was his third consecutive title indoors (he finished the 1992 season with two titles), in retrospect I know it was the end of his reign on the faster surfaces, nevertheless, he had still three good years ahead.
Very similar prize money in Memphis, but the draw consisted of 48 players as opposed to 32 in Milan. Jim Courier [1] didn’t belong to the most efficient players when he and his rivals were close to victory, but that week in Tennessee, fresh after clinching his second Aussie Open title, he was a mental giant from the third round onwards. First, in 3R he withstood a match point on serve, then in QF a match point on return (against a big-serving opponent), in the semifinal he was two games away from defeat, and in the final a few points away in two consecutive sets. During the 2-hour 43-minute final against his peer Todd Martin [96, first ATP final], Courier squandered five match points at 5:4*, but stayed composed (a year before he lost a final in Brussels wasting good chances in three sets leading 2-0!). “I think the win against Agassi just made me feel like I could compete at the highest level and win,” Martin said, after his breakthrough tournament. “I’ve come close, but I never won against the best players in the world.” Courier explained that his tormented route to the title was caused by the change of sleep patterns following his comeback to the United States from Australia. In two matches he collected fewer points, and he won as many points as his opponent in the semifinal. The first of three cases in the 90s when the champion was one point away from defeat in two matches.

…Finals 2023…

Montpellier (ATP 250, hard indoors)
(2)🇮🇹Jannik Sinner d. 🇺🇸Maxime Cressy 7-6(3), 6-3
Dallas (ATP 250, hard indoors)
🇨🇳Wu Yibing d. (5)🇺🇸John Isner 6-7(4), 7-6(3), 7-6(12) – 4 m.p.
Cordoba (ATP 250, clay outdoors)
(4)🇦🇷Sebastian Baez d. (6)🇦🇷Federico Coria 6-1, 3-6, 6-3

…Finals 1993…

Milan ($675K, carpet indoors)
(2)🇩🇪Boris Becker d. 🇪🇸Sergi Bruguera 6-3, 6-3
Memphis ($655K, hard indoors)
(1)🇺🇸Jim Courier d. 🇺🇸Todd Martin 5-7, 7-6(4), 7-6(4)

…2023…

The 111th edition of the Davis Cup. This team competition lost its prestige five years ago (Croatia d. France in the final). Between 1981 and 2018 everything was clear: World Group consisted of 16 teams and the knockout system throughout the season, at least three rubbers were required to win each tie, all vital matches in the “best of five” format. Unfortunately, it’s been a mess since 2019 (the competition was not held in 2020 due to Covid-19); each year the new structure is differentiated by nuances, all rubbers are played in the “best of three” format though. In the first four editions with the new structure, the ties have been composed of three rubbers maximum in the season-ending event (18 teams divided into six groups of the first two editions, 16 teams in another two), the entrance to the ending event it’s a slight comeback to the tradition, yet the initial ties are played within two days not three like before (singles matches separated by doubles) following the Australian Open. Something that traditionally was called the ‘First Round of World Group’, currently is called the ‘Qualifying Round’ – 24 teams are gathered to emerge twelve teams who join four seeded teams (last year’s finalists and two teams with “wild cards”) in the so-called ‘Finals’ played at two levels (September – groups & November – knockout stage). In the new structure, dead fifth or third rubbers are not played. I don’t like the new structure at all…
In the most interesting tie (Trier), Germany lost to Switzerland. There was the only opportunity during the weekend, to see two Grand Slam finalists (& Olympic medalists) facing each other, albeit neither of them is in a form reminding their best years; Alexander Zverev outplayed Stan Wawrinka [135], but ultimately the Swiss team prevailed trailing 1:2 after doubles. Credit to the 37-year-old Wawrinka, who played six sets on Saturday (in the decisive rubber he defeated a debutant, Daniel Altmaier, a player who reminds Wawrinka, especially by the backhand technique). Wawrinka is the most experienced active Davis Cup player – he made his debut in 2004 losing a dead rubber vs Romania. I’d say that the only surprising outcome came from Espoo – Finland has only one representative in the Top 100 while Argentina has six, however, the team captain Guillermo Coria didn’t find in his team a player who would defeat Emil Ruusuvuori [43] – the only man to get 2.5 points during the weekend. Korea’s victory over Belgium in Seoul may also be perceived as a sensation, but Korea’s best Soon-Woo Kwon plays well lately, and two points from him could be anticipated; paradoxically he lost to a weaker Belgian, and Korea as the only team this weekend, came back from a 0:2 deficit after day one. “I tried to show my strengths as much as I could and tried to frustrate my opponent,” said Seong-Chan Hong [237] after the decisive match he won with a beautiful backhand lob. “As soon as I started, I thought it was working well today. The atmosphere was good before the game. Of course, I was very nervous, but I was also very excited. After the match point, I thought I showed it.” Borna Gojo [121] significantly helped Croatia to beat Austria. The almost 25-year-old player finds another gear when he represents his country; his main-level record it is a modest 11-11, and as many as nine wins come from team competitions (Davis Cup & United Cup)… Two ties were played on clay outdoors (Colombia, Chile – both South American countries), others indoors, albeit Portugal chose clay instead of hard, in vain, Portuguese leader João Sousa [84] lost both singles matches and painfully drops outside the Top 100 because a year before at the same time he claimed the Pune title.

Qualifiers (host first):
Croatia – Austria 3-1, Hungary – France 2-3, Uzbekistan – USA 0-4, Germany – Switzerland 2-3,
Colombia – Britain 1-3, Norway – Serbia 0-4, Chile – Kazakhstan 3-1, South Korea – Belgium 3-2,
Sweden – Bosnia 3-1, Netherlands – Slovakia 4-0, Finland – Argentina 3-1, Portugal – Czechia 1-3

…1993…

The year 1993 marked the inception of ATP tennis in the Persian Gulf. In the first week of the year, the first edition took place in Doha (Qatar), and one month later – the first edition was in Dubai (United Arab Emirates). Despite twofold bigger prize money, Dubai didn’t draw similar attention in its inaugural event in comparison to the neighboring Qatar – in Doha arrived three Top 5 players while top-seeded in Dubai was Alexander Volkov, ranked no. 17. The final was eventually played on Monday afternoon (too strong wind & rain on Sunday) with Karel Nováček [23] defeating Fabrice Santoro [39], who became a regular Dubai visitor, making twelve appearances, eventually got his name etched on the Silver Dhow trophy in 2002, beating Younes El Aynaoui in a dramatic final (the Moroccan also participated in the first edition and would play there nine more times being the crowd favorite as a native Arabian speaker).
Marc Rosset [44], who skipped Australian Open, en route to his fourth title (Marseille), had the toughest match in the opening round as he ousted in an all-tie-break three-set battle Stephane Simian, the left-handed Frenchman, one of a few players wearing eye-glasses. It was the first of five matches of this kind in 1993. Quite unusual that among five players defeated by Rosset, four were left-handers (all operating with one-handed backhands).
The 40-year-old Jimmy Connors [90] played the last semifinal of his extraordinary career in California. Connors had to retire because of a bone spur in his right foot facing Brad Gilbert [25]. There was 6-1, 1-4 for the nine years younger American, so fans of Jimbo could believe he’d reach his first final since 1989. In the final Gilbert miraculously avoided a straight-sets defeat to Andre Agassi [9] who entered the season in February for the sixth year in a row. He would do the same the following year, and it might be considered an important aspect of his longevity – while the majority of players had only one month of a break between seasons, in Agassi’s case it was two months which accumulate additional seven months of rest when he reached 25. Björn Borg [776] was finally able to win a set. The 36-year-old Swede, an 11-time Grand Slam champion, came back to the tour in Monte Carlo ’91 and since then he suffered nine 0-2 defeats on the ATP tour. It was the last professional event when two legends of the game, the best players of the 70s, Borg & Connors entered the same draw…

…Finals 1993…

Dubai (1M $, hard outdoors)
(3)🇨🇿Karel Nováček d. (8,WC)🇫🇷Fabrice Santoro 6-4, 7-5
Marseille (500K $, carpet indoors)
(6)🇨🇭Marc Rosset d. (8)🇳🇱Jan Siemerink 6-2, 7-6(1)
San Francisco (275K $, hard indoors)
(1)🇺🇸Andre Agassi d. (2)🇺🇸Brad Gilbert 6-2, 6-7(4), 6-2

…2023…

An unusual Slam that gathered high-ranked players born in three different decades. Two arguably best players in history born in the 80s, Rafael Nadal [2] and Novak Đoković [5], at the beginning of the new season seem to be in completely different places in terms of expectations. Đoković still looks fresh and is almost unbeaten lately, while Nadal has been struggling with injuries since Wimbledon ’22. The Spaniard was sensationally eliminated in the second round by Mackenzie McDonald [65] whom had humiliated in their only previous meeting at Roland Garros. It’s tough to believe that Nadal would be easily expected to win the French Open again, for the 15th time, but he reinvented himself so many times during clay-court seasons after the poor finish of indoor seasons that everything is actually possible. The Nadal/Đoković’s greatest active rival, rather not considered a title favorite wherever he plays since 2017, Andy Murray [66], displayed one more time his amazing fighting spirit outlasting in very dramatic night session five-setters, two players nine years his junior! Especially his second round match against Thanasi Kokkinakis [159] will be remembered. It lasted 5 hours 45 minutes, ending at 4.05 am. Murray was two points away to lose in three and five sets (in the deciding set of the first round against seeded Matteo Berrettini, he saved a match point which he should have lost because the Italian netted an easy backhand pass).
Despite Carlos Alcaraz‘s absence, three players born in the 21st Century could be expected in the quarterfinals for the first time as far as majors are concerned. Among those three who advanced, there were two revelations: Jiří Lehečka [71] and Ben Shelton [89]. Their path was different though: Lehečka defeated three seeds, while Shelton didn’t face a seeded player even in the lost quarterfinal, nonetheless, it’s tough to believe Shelton wouldn’t play in the last eight at majors again… There were many unexpected results, but the conclusion was more than obvious. Stefanos Tsitsipas finally advanced to the final in Melbourne (three semifinals lost before) playing cards of the crowd favorite, but in the end-match, he faced Đoković, whose successes in the event are incomparable with anyone else. The 35-year-old Serb began the fortnight by signalizing problems with left hamstring. Some people were accusing him of exaggeration, but I have to admit he didn’t look perfectly fit in the first three rounds… in the “sweet sixteen” he destroyed the last Aussie – Alex de Minaur, and his movement in the last four matches was perfect. He was also hitting powerful second serves & forehands with staggering consistency. It’s astonishing how easily he defeated ~10 years younger opponents in the second week. The scoreline of his final is more balanced than its progress – Tsitsipas, in tie-break sets, never led with a comfortable cushion. The 10th Aussie Open for the Serb, it’s rather not the end of his reign in Melbourne, he is hungry and dedicated to consume more glory…
Three potentially seeded players withdrew: Alcaraz [1], Marin Čilić & Nick Kyrgios. Among players with skills to enter the second week, also Gaël Monfils & Reilly Opelka didn’t make trips to Australia. The Frenchman hasn’t played since August ’22 (dropped from no. 20 to 209 within five months!), he’s 36, and it’s plausible he would shortly join his countrymen (Jo-Wilfried Tsonga & Gilles Simon) who finished their careers last year… Andrey Rublev [6] has equalled Tommy Robredo‘s infamous record of seven Slam quarterfinal defeats not reaching the semifinals. This time Rublev shouldn’t be sad because in the fourth round, he won a match he should have lost twice: trailed *2:5 in the decider against Holger Rune (the first Dane in the Aussie Open 4th round since 1993) and 0:5 in the super tie-break. Rublev’s quarterfinal chances against Đoković were illusory, he knew it. Trivia: the third player born in the 21st Century to play a quarterfinal, American Sebastian Korda, defeated in the third round the two-time runner-up Daniil Medvedev. Thirty years ago there was also a 3rd round meeting between Korda & Medvedev. Then, Petr (Sebastian’s father) representing the newly formatted Czechia, ousted Andrei of Ukraine – not related to Daniil of Russia – in four sets.  The last few months and this year’s Aussie Open in particular, bring rejuvenation of the American tennis; there are 10 US players in the Top 50 now, the most since 1995. The situation isn’t totally comparable because the current best US player (Taylor Fritz) is arguably at the level of a 5th best American 28 years ago.

…1993…

The sixth edition at Flinders Park. Two top players, coincidentally the Wimbledon finalists at the time, withdrew (Goran Ivanišević – left foot, Andre Agassi – bronchitis), but finally played Pete Sampras, who had missed the event in the previous two seasons. The American was among the favorites for the title but lost in the semifinal quite an unfortunate match to Stefan Edberg in straight sets having built a big lead in sets 1 and 3. In the final, just like a year before, Jim Courier outplayed Edberg in four sets, that time a bit easier, actually crashing the Swede in the opening two sets. Courier confirmed his status as the best player in the world, it seemed he’d rule the 90s – it didn’t happen though… The event marked the beginning of the end of 33-year-old Ivan Lendl – the best player of the 80s lost his 1R match (it didn’t happen to him at Slams since Wimbledon ’81!). Another two seasons clearly showed that the Czech (American citizenship), couldn’t be a threat in the “best of five” format anymore. Generally from the fourth round onwards, it was a disappointing event with many one-sided encounters. There was only one thrilling match in the second week, as Brett Steven [71] upset the local fans, overcoming Richard Fromberg [78] in a night session battle on Centre Court after 4 hours 36 minutes (the longest match in that edition) saving two match points. Steven’s career-best result; the same experience for two American qualifiers, who sensationally advanced to the fourth round: good doubles player Kelly Jones [447] & unknown Chris Garner [220], who never entered the Top 100 – he enjoyed a super beneficial draw facing three players outside the Top 100. No one could expect then that the 19-year-old Kenneth Carlsen (major debutant) would play his first and last match in the “sweet sixteen”. Carlsen [73], the best Dane of the 90s, didn’t emulate that result in his other 45 attempts!

…Final 2023…

AUSTRALIAN OPEN (34.8M A$, hard outdoors/indoors)
(4)🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. (3)🇬🇷Stefanos Tsitsipas 6-3, 7-6(4), 7-6(5)

…Final 1993…

AUSTRALIAN OPEN (1.9M $, hard outdoors)
(1)🇺🇸Jim Courier d. (2)🇸🇪Stefan Edberg 6-2, 6-1, 2-6, 7-5

…2023…

New South Wales… A similar story to the one of 2003 when the best Korean of the 00s, Hyung-Taik Lee [85] stunned Juan Carlos Ferrero [4] in the Sydney final as a qualifier. This time, Lee’s compatriot Soon-Woo Kwon [lucky loser, 84] edged Ferrero’s compatriot – Roberto Bautista Agut [18]. “Since being beaten in [qualifying], I told myself I’ve got nothing to lose, and then I came all the way to the finals,” said Kwon, the 10th “lucky loser” champion at the main level since 1978. “And why not? I put every energy into it, and that worked.” Quite intriguing that Kwon overcame Tomáš Macháč [115, second-best Czech currently] in the first round – the Czech player had defeated Kwon in their qualifying meeting. In the final, Kwon came back from a break point down at 0:2 in the decider against 34-year-old Bautista [26].
The big surprise in Auckland. I considered Richard Gasquet [67] as a finished player already a few years ago, I thought that he’d sting only in French “250” events indoors; meanwhile, the 36-year-old Frenchman claimed his 16th title (the first one in almost five years) outside Europe, under the antipodes scorching sun, producing one of the best comebacks of his career in the final – he trailed *0:3 (0/40) in the 3rd set against one of the fittest guys on the tour, a local favorite to some degree (Cameron Norrie was representing New Zealand until 2013 when as an 18-year-old boy he switched his allegiance to Great Britain). Gasquet took advantage of several things during the week: super easy draw in 1R, quite good in the next two rounds, in the semifinal he didn’t have to enter the court (Lestienne’s walkover), and the temperature was a bit lower than usual in Auckland.
Generally, it was a great week for French tennis which suffers a big crisis lately: Constant Lestienne [65] reached the semifinal while Quentin Halys [64] advanced to the quarterfinals and was defeated second straight week 6-7, 6-7. Very good results for the second-tier French guys, new ATP faces, especially for Lestienne. It’s worth mentioning that he needed nine years to finally enter the Top 100 – it occurred last year in August thanks to good results in hardcourt Challengers (Spain, France). The 30-year-old man from Paris will play his first major event next week in Australia!

…1993…

Pete Sampras [3] successfully began his campaign to become not only the best player of 1993, but also the best one in the 90s. The 21-year-old American dropped the inaugural set (to 18-year-old Andrei Medvedev, 23 – the highest-ranked unseeded player), then he went through the Sydney event effortlessly, winning five matches within five days (nonetheless he had to save a set point in the final against Thomas Muster, 18) wearing a baseball cap which was unusual to him. “I’m playing pretty well, (but) I’m pretty tired right now,” he stated after the final referring to high temperatures.
The second week running in Indonesia, this time with a superstar Michael Chang [6], who loved Asian events and decided to make a trip to the resurrected Jakarta Open (not held in the years 1975-92). The Chinese American dropped a set only in the final, it was his 10th title, Sampras claimed his 13th – these two prodigies, along with Andre Agassi, were at the same level more or less then: each of them had won one major. Chang will be distanced by Sampras & Agassi soon. Fourth best US player of that generation – Jim Courier – won a six-man lucrative exhibition (180K $) in Adelaide; after two easy group wins, Courier defeated 1-6, 6-4, 6-3 Petr Korda in the final to collect the winner-take-all 100,000 prize money. “Petr has a lot of talent,” Courier said, referring to their French Open 1992 final. “No one gets to the final of a Grand Slam without being able to win it. He is a threat anywhere.” They face each other two weeks later in the Aussie Open quarterfinal, and Courier destroys Korda 6-1, 6-0, 6-4.

…Finals 2023…

Adelaide-2 (ATP 250, hard semi-outdoors)
(LL)🇰🇷Soon-Woo Kwon d. (4)🇪🇸Roberto Bautista Agut 6-4, 3-6, 7-6(4)
Auckland (ATP 250, hard outdoors)
🇫🇷Richard Gasquet d. (1)🇬🇧Cameron Norrie 4-6, 6-4, 6-4

…Finals 1993…

Sydney (275K $, hard outdoors)
(1)🇺🇸Pete Sampras d. (7)🇦🇹Thomas Muster 7-6(7), 6-1
Jakarta (275K $, hard outdoors)
(1)🇺🇸Michael Chang d. (8)🇩🇪Carl-Uwe Steeb 2-6, 6-2, 6-1
Auckland (157K $, hard outdoors)
(2)🇷🇺Alexander Volkov d. (1)🇺🇸MaliVai Washington 7-6(2), 6-4

…2023…

First edition of a new team event combining ATP & WTA – United Cup which replaced the ATP Cup (it’d replaced the Hopman Cup in 2020). 18 teams in the mix, six groups, then specific quarterfinals (one loser with the best ratio goes through!), semifinals & final, everything played in three Australian cities (Perth, Brisbane, Sydney). The Americans had the strongest team with two male and two female players in the Top 20, and they confirmed it by winning all five matches without serious troubles. Taylor Fritz [9], who seems to be a new force in men’s tennis, gave the decisive point to the US. The event marked the official comeback of Alexander Zverev [12] who was sidelined for seven months due to a terrible injury he suffered at Roland Garros, and participated in a ridiculous exhibition event at the end of the last year. His return to the circuit wasn’t successful – the loss to Fritz could be expected, yet his quick defeat to Jiří Lehečka [81] isn’t a good prognostic for the rest of the season. Both matches also lost Rafael Nadal [2] who experiences one of the most difficult periods of his 20-year-old career. The Spaniard has won only 4 of his last 11 matches. Nonetheless, he lost in Australia rather tight matches against the Top 20 players, it’s perhaps a bit optimistic with the Aussie Open on the horizon. Too early to predict he’s finally finished.
The fifth edition of the event in Pune is won by Tallon Griekspoor [95] – he was three points away from defeat in the final. The Dutchman claimed his maiden ATP title in a relatively poor field (the beaten finalist participated in his first final too). In 2021 Griekspoor was sensationally good at the Challenger level (8 titles), yet in 2022 he didn’t do any damage in ATP. In the Hindu city, he took advantage of Marin Čilić‘s (seeded no. 1) withdrawal in the quarterfinal.
Much better players entered the first of two events held in Adelaide this year – four Top 10ers. It seemed highly unlikely someone else would claim the title, but it almost happened – Sebastian Korda [33] had a match point against Novak Đoković [5] in the final when the Serb was playing his least reliable shot – an overhead, jumping – this time it was successful and the rest is history. The Serb got his title no. 92 equalizing achievement of his biggest rival – Nadal. The Serb will turn 36 this year, but he’s still in such an amazing physical condition that 100 titles should pop up in his CV at some point this decade… Notable players who finished careers last year (their highest ranking in parentheses): Tommy Robredo (5), Philipp Kohlschreiber (16), Andreas Seppi (18), Gilles Simon (6), Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (5), Kevin Anderson (5)… Juan Martín del Potro (3) & Roger Federer (1) made only cameos last year.

…1993…

The first week of a new season, delivered the first Arabian event in ATP history! The two best players at the turn of the 80s and 90s, Boris Becker [5] and Stefan Edberg [2] arrived in the Arabian Peninsula encouraging other top players to do the same in the years to come. They faced each other in the semifinal, and in the final Becker prevailed against Goran Ivanišević [4] in a dramatic encounter between two off the six best-serving players at the time.
Other two players belonging to the mix of the most threatening servers at the time, Michael Stich and left-handed Guy Forget played a dramatic semifinal encounter at the Hopman Cup – an unofficial event, yet for the first time 30 aces were served within three sets – Stich did it; Forget was serving to win the match before losing 2-6, 7-6(1), 6-7(2). In the mixed doubles which couldn’t change the final outcome of the Germany-France tie, Stich’s partner Steffi Graf sprained her right ankle. The following day she was able to defeat her long-time rival Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario anyway. Czech Republic appeared on the tennis map; on December 31, 1992, CzechoSlovakia split into two independent countries. Czechs lost to Spaniards in the semifinal.
Similarly tight final to that one in Doha, occurred in Adelaide where two Swedes co-created a domestic end-game. “I fought as much as I could and I was lucky to win,” Nicklas Kulti [79] said after the 2-hour, 36-minute win over Christian Bergström [58], who had a double match point at 5:4 in the 2nd set and led 4:2 in the decider. “I’m very pleased to have won. I couldn’t have had a better week,” concluded Kulti capturing the Adelaide title for the second time in three years. For Bergström it was another painful final in Adelaide, a year before he lost to Ivanisevic being two points away from victory. These two finals are the only ones in Bergström’s career which is quite intriguing given his three Grand Slam quarterfinals. He delusionally said: “You can be sure that I will be back until I win this tournament.” The weaker field than in Adelaide was witnessed in Kuala Lumpur where the prize money was distinctively higher. It was the first Malaysian Open since 1975…

The first season since 1977 without 33-year-old John McEnroe [20], the 7-time Grand Slam champion, who played his last professional match on December 10, 1992 (he’ll make a cameo in Rotterdam 15 months later). Other left-handed legend, 4-time Grand Slam champion Guillermo Vilas, also finished his career in 1992 playing the last two matches, but the 40-year-old Argentine was inactive in the years 1989-91… Jim Courier, the best player of 1992, begins the new season with ~400 points advantage over Stefan Edberg & ~500 points over Pete Sampras.

…Finals 2023…

“United Cup” – Sydney (hard indoors)
USA d. Italy 4-0
Pune (ATP 250, hard outdoors)
🇳🇱Tallon Griekspoor d. 🇫🇷Benjamin Bonzi 4-6, 7-5, 6-3
Adelaide-1 (ATP 250, hard semi-outdoors)
(1)🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. 🇺🇸Sebastian Korda 6-7(8), 7-6(3), 6-4

…Finals 1993…

“Hopman Cup” – Perth (hard indoors)
Germany d. Spain 2-1
Adelaide (157K $, hard outdoors)
🇸🇪Nicklas Kulti d. 🇸🇪Christian Bergström 3-6, 7-5, 6-4 – 2 m.p.
Kuala Lumpur-1 (275K $, hard outdoors)
(4)🇺🇸Richey Reneberg d. (7)🇫🇷Olivier Delaître 6-3, 6-1
Doha (450K $, hard outdoors)
(3)🇩🇪Boris Becker d. (2)🇭🇷Goran Ivanišević 7-6(4), 4-6, 7-5

After a ten-year break, I’ve decided to come back to updating the website on a weekly basis. I didn’t think I’d do something like this in June ’13 when I decided to stop. Now the times are different, there’s finally a refreshment, yet not so big I could imagine ten years ago. The veterans, the best players of the previous decade (Novak Djokovic & Rafael Nadal) are still at the top, yet a few years older than them, the best player of the 00s – Roger Federer – finally decided to quit. We will not see him in action in 2023 – it’ll be the first year without any of his appearances at the main level since 1998! The fourth-best player born in the 80s, Andy Murray, still plays, he’s nowhere near his form of the year 2016 though, when he reached the top, and shortly after he suffered a serious hip injury that forced him to suspend his career with a possibility of retirement.  Four players of the elite when I stopped (David Ferrer, Tomas Berdych, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga & Juan Martin del Potro) – they all have finished their careers, Tsonga & Del Potro did it this year, the Argentine made a cameo actually, likewise Federer.

Predictions are nerve easy, nevertheless, I assume that the year 2023 may bring a new sort of exciting rivalry between four players born in the 21st Century (Carlos Alcaraz, Felix Auger-Aliassime, Holger Rune & Jannik Sinner). My book about the best players of the Open Era, I divided into chapters of decades, and each new chapter was preceded by photos of the four best players born in specific decades. From this perspective the generation of players born in the 90s has been the worst and wasted to some degree (Dominic Thiem, Alexander Zverev, Stefanos Tsitsipas & Daniil Medvedev) – none of these players have won 2 major titles at least! They all have already crossed the boundary separating young perspective players from the experienced ones (the age 23-24 symbolizes it in some regards from my point of view). Apart from Thiem, who is already a veteran, according to pre-21st Century standards, other best guys born in the 90s are still at the top, yet tough to imagine that any of them would be able to dominate the next few years like many great champions before (Bjorn Borg in the second half of the 70s, Ivan Lendl in the 80s, Pete Sampras in the 90s, Federer in the 00s, Djokovic in the 10s). Zverev comes back to the circuit after a seven-month break caused by a serious injury (tearing 3 ligaments in his right ankle ), his future at the top it’s a big question mark. The 19-year-old Alcaraz has recently become the youngest player in history to finish the season as no. 1, nonetheless, there are many question marks considering his future because he still hasn’t done anything impressive on grass and indoors. Auger & Rune finished the ’22 season in great form, certainly, they have the basis to dream about overthrowing Alcaraz soon; I look forward to observing their efforts as well as Sinner’s, who 1.5 years ago seemed like a potential no. 1 this decade, but he hasn’t significantly developed since then, he’s still deprived of a major semifinal, albeit he has almost done it in an arguably most entertaining match of the season. Will he step forward next year? If not, I guess he should be a leading figure anyway, certainly he is good enough to win a few Masters 1K titles at least.

I don’t want to repeat myself, I need a new format, therefore I’ve decided to analyze the year 2023 with flashbacks to the season 1993 – one of the first few I witnessed in my life watching matches week by week. I’m not sure how exactly I’ll be doing this, time will tell… 

Final

Alexander Zverev d. Daniil Medvedev    6-4, 6-4    [1:15 h]

Medvedev began to play his best tennis when he was trailing 4-6, *0:2… prior to that moment he had hit just 1 winner! I suppose he was a victim of that what I thought in the middle of his 3rd set vs Sinner. He plays a type of tennis which requires a lot of energy, and he paid the price for three tight three-setters at the round robin stage. Admittedly he defeated Ruud rather easily in the semifinal, but the accumulation of that victory and three preceding ones, probably caused his decision to try saving the energy for a potential 3rd set vs Zverev. When he decided to step up at 0:2 in the 2nd set, it was too late. Zverev converted his first match point with a second serve ace (in ten service games he played ‘deuce’ only once). He has won 5 titles this year (59 matches, more than anyone else), just like the finest player in the world – Djokovic, but the Serb won three majors while Zverev’s two biggest titles (Olympics & Masters) are one level below. The German of the Russian origin is 10 years younger than the Serb, so my bet is that he will finish as no. 1 the next season in which he finally should raise his first major trophy, he’s good enough to actually conquer each of four Slams, not within a season though. “It is special, and I am super thrilled and happy right now,” Zverev added. “There is no better way to end the season than winning here. I am incredibly happy and I am already looking forward to next year.” Stats of the match

Points won directly behind the serve: Zverev 20/54 (37%), Medvedev 18/58 (31%)… Total points: 61-51

Semifinals

Alexander Zverev d. Novak Djokovic    7-6(4), 4-6, 6-3    [2:28 h]

These two players have faced each other in all biggest hardcourt events this year: Djokovic won their major matches (3-1 in Australia, 3-2 in the USA) while Zverev was better at the Olympics and at Masters (2-1 on each occasion). Only in Australia it was a quarterfinal, another three matches occurred in the semifinals. It was rather obvious that Zverev would defeat Djokovic indoors, only if he delivered his best service performance… and it happened in Turin. In the 1st set there was a set point for the Serb as he led 5:4* – Zverev responded with a service winner followed by another one (223 kph second serve!). The crucial break came as he led 2:1 in the 3rd set. The German finished the contest with an ace down the T to hold at ‘love’. “He’s one of the best servers in the world… He showed tonight why that is a fact. He got himself out of trouble a few times with [his] serve,” Djokovic said. “I was serving pretty good, as well. I just had the one very bad game in the third set. Three forehands, one backhand unforced error, really from pretty easy positions. [I] just really wasted the match in that game. Even though I thought it was quite even, had some chances to come back, 2:4 in the third, just missed again, a forehand long (on break point).” Stats of the match

Points won directly behind the serve: Zverev 39/96 (40%), Djokovic 39/92 (42%)… Total points: 98-90

Daniil Medvedev d. Casper Ruud    6-4, 6-2     [1:19 h]

They had played before hardcourt outdoors (Australia) & grass (England), and on both occasions Medvedev left the court as a convincing victor. On hardcourt indoors in Italy the situation was the same… maybe on his beloved clay, Ruud would win at least a set. The Norwegian wanted to be aggressive, he risked his second serve at 1-all (deuce) in the opener, committed a double fault and it was the beginning of his end; Medvedev was better in each department, no signs of fatigue after his three demanding group matches. “As soon as you are a set and a break up you feel like you are in control, but that is when the danger is,” Medvedev said in his on-court interview. “You need to stay focused and fight for every point. In the last game I had 0/30 on my serve, and until the last point, it is never over. So I am happy I was able to finish it.” He added: “Just three of us left here, so I am looking forward to a great match tomorrow no matter who I play. I had a few tough matches against Novak lately and a few tough matches against Sascha and one here this week, so it is going to be interesting.” I assume when Ruud retires, the ‘Masters’ semifinal will be one of a few highlights of his career. I rather doubt that he’s going to take part in this event next year.

Points won directly behind the serve: Medvedev 12/47 (25%), Ruud 13/62 (20%)… Total points: 62-47

Green Group – day 6

Novak Djokovic d. (alt.)Cameron Norrie    6-2, 6-1    [1:06 h]

An exhibition match actually, but this last ’round robin’ meeting wasn’t similar to yesterday’s between Medvedev & Sinner at all. The difference in skills between Djokovic & Norrie is huge, and their first meeting reflected it. The Serb got an early break and was doing on court whatever he wanted being very relaxed. Great experience for Norrie after a tremendous season anyway. I don’t expect to see him in the Top 20 twelve months from now. “I tried not to think about tomorrow’s semi-final,” Djokovic said in his on-court interview. “It is not easy to walk on the court knowing you have already qualified and you know your opponent. I tried to be professional and I tried to give my best and I played really well. It was the first time we have played each other. I took the time away from Cameron. I analysed his game and knew the game plan and executed it very well.” Djokovic’s 14th appearance in the season-ending event, and for the 11th time he will play in the semifinals.

Points won directly behind the serve: Djokovic 11/38 (28%), Norrie 7/51 (13%)… Total points: 56-33

Casper Ruud d. Andrey Rublev    2-6, 7-5, 7-6(5)    [2:23 h]

Informal quarterfinal – the winner goes to the semifinal… Rublev was a big favourite having defeated Ruud in all their four previous meetings, including three on Ruud’s best surface – clay. Early on the Russian confirmed his superiority in their H2H, 6-2, *2:1 (40/15)… he lost his serve though, threw his racquet and it was the beginning of bad things to come for him. Ruud did the same what in his previous match vs Norrie – increased the speed of 1st and 2nd serves, and was trying to be more aggressive with his forehand running around his backhand on many occasions. He came back from a break down also in the decider (2:3), saved a mini-match point at 5-all, and fired two aces when it mattered the most on ad-court: first at 4:3 (down the T), then at 6:5 (out-wide). “The court is playing very fast and Andrey plays very fast,” Ruud said in his on-court interview. “He rips the ball harder than anyone on the Tour and serves very well on his first serve. We all want to play under control and with initiative, but it is not easy against Rublev because he makes you run all the time and play defensively all the time. I knew I had to fight fire with fire. On the big points I think I played quite smartly.” Ruud has won all his three matches this year which gone to the deciding 3rd set tie-break.

Points won directly behind the serve: Ruud 30/116 (25%), Rublev 36/92 (39%)… Total points: 98-110

Red Group – day 5

Daniil Medvedev d. (alt.)Jannik Sinner    6-0, 6-7(5), 7-6(8)    [2:29 h]

On paper it was a semi-exhibition encounter because regardless of the final outcome, Medvedev had secured the first place in his group while Sinner couldn’t advance to the semifinals. Sinner began poorly, but playing in front of the supporting crowd, he wanted to stay on the court as long as possible showing positive emotions in the 1st game of the 2nd set, and the match was tense since then to its conclusion two hours later. There was 5-all in the first tie-break when Medvedev chose a surprising solution and delivered a technical serve attacking the net (the previous five TB points he obtained with powerful serves) sending his block-volley wide. The decider was very intriguing: Sinner led 4:2* when Medvedev proposed an extremely fast game on his serve. He held after a few deuces playing at full speed 1st & 2nd serves. It changed the rhythm a bit, and a bunch of Sinner’s errors allowed Medvedev to break back. In the deciding tie-break, the young Italian had two match points on return: 6:5 (Medvedev’s second unreturned serve 201 kph!) & 8:7 (Medvedev’s FH drive-volley winner). Trying to save the second match point, Sinner was perhaps too passive during a baseline rally, and the Russian hit a backhand down the line winner.

Points won directly behind the serve: Medvedev 46/102 (45%), Sinner 21/104 (20%)… Total points: 111-95

Alexander Zverev d. Hubert Hurkacz    6-2, 6-4    [1:02 h]

A match to be quickly forgotten. Admittedly Hurkacz could give his all, win it after a tough battle, and still didn’t qualify to the semifinals (on the assumption he wins, Medvedev must have defeated Sinner to push the Pole to the last four), but there are 200 ATP points (more or less like advancing to a small ATP final) & prestige anyway. Unfortunately the Pole played it like he didn’t care, especially in the first ten minutes – the 1st set he played in a 70/80% mode, the 2nd in 80/90% – the score reflected it. Zverev went through the match actually not being threatened on his serve (one ‘deuce’ in nine service games). “I have played Novak in every single big hard-court tournament this year,” Zverev said about his upcoming semifinal against Djokovic “We are making a habit of playing in the later rounds at big tournaments. It is going to be an entertaining one I think.” Hurkacz has finished the event with a 1-6 record in sets (no chance to win any of those six lost), I don’t expect him to participate in this event again. I doubt that he would end up the 2022 season in the Top 20.

Points won directly behind the serve: Zverev 27/48 (56%), Hurkacz 17/54 (31%)… Total points: 61-41

Green Group – day 4

Casper Ruud d. (alt.)Cameron Norrie    1-6, 6-3, 6-4    [1:51 h]

It’s only the second time in the 52-year-old tournament history, that two alternates appear at ’round robin’ stage with chances to reach the semifinals (previously it happened in 1998 when Rios & Agassi, after their first matches, were replaced by A.Costa & Rusedski). Norrie has replaced Tsitsipas (elbow injury) and very interesting situation all of a sudden: either of  players who seemed to me like potential whipping boys (Norrie had chances to qualify until Paris-Bercy), will have at least one victory… I estimate them at very similar technical-mental level, so Ruud’s 6-0, 6-2 over Norrie in the San Diego final a few weeks ago it was a very surprising scoreline as well as their 1st set in Turin which lasted only 30 minutes. Ruud remained cool with the recent memory of their San Diego match, increased the speed of his serves and his break point chances came – he converted them when led 4:3 in 2nd and at 2-all in 3rd. In the last two sets Ruud didn’t face a break point, he was forced to play ‘deuce’ on serve only in the last game after Norrie had withstood a triple match point.

Points won directly behind the serve: Ruud 24/71 (33%), Norrie 18/83 (21%)… Total points: 78-75

Novak Djokovic d. Andrey Rublev    6-3, 6-2    [1:08 h]

Prior to Turin, Djokovic had faced all the best players born in the 90s except Rublev (not counting a Davis Cup match in doubles two years ago) and Norrie, so I was curious how he’d deal within three days with the fury of baseline strokes of the ginger Russian and an enormous patience of the Scottish Brit. Rublev stormed early, breaking in the opening game, but as the match progressed he was gradually wilting. Djokovic used only one dropshot in the entire match, but his basic strokes were efficient enough to turn Rublev into an error machine, besides that the Serb looked as fresh as a daisy, and he was obtaining points directly behind the serve with astonishing frequency second match running. Djokovic, who has already secured the pole position, admitted: ” Winning the first set I put additional pressure on him, and I started to maybe play more consistently from the back of the court. I served well [and] that helped tremendously.”

Points won directly behind the serve: Djokovic 26/48 (54%), Rublev 12/52 (23%)… Total points: 60-40

Red Group – day 3

(alt.)Jannik Sinner d. Hubert Hurkacz    6-2, 6-2    [1:25 h]

Tuesday… Only four hours before this match it was officially confirmed what I had actually known already on Sunday evening – Sinner replaces the follow Italian, Berrettini. In the 21st Century, before Sinner (20.5) only two younger players had taken part in the season ending event: Lleyton Hewitt (19.9) and Juan M. Del Potro (20.3). Sinner entered the event having lost six straight sets, I knew he would’t lose eight, but it was also tough to expect such a beat-down of Hurkacz. The Pole played pretty good first set, but lost it badly in terms of the score and seemed overwhelmed by the crowd supporting Sinner. Once Hurkacz dropped his serve at 1-all in the 2nd set, the match was basically over because the Pole doesn’t change anything in his game when he is down, he may only count on the opponent’s lapse of concentration. In this case it couldn’t happen because Sinner was constantly stimulated by the crowd and an opportunity to finish the season in the Top 10 opening a door for the semifinal corridor. “I knew around 5 (p.m.) that I would play,” Sinner said. “I was ready to go on court. It is an incredible feeling playing here in Italy with thousands of people cheering for you and I am trying my best. I will enjoy the moment. I played well and felt good in the warm up. It was an incredible match today.”

Points won directly behind the serve: Sinner 21/69 (30%), Hurkacz 13/47 (27%)… Total points: 68-48

Daniil Medvedev d. Alexander Zverev    6-3, 6-7(3), 7-6(6)    [2:35 h]

The 11th meeting of “Russian towers” (Zverev represents Germany, but his parents are Russians) and finally very tight encounter adequate to the serving power they possess. I expected a match like this, but the first three games made me wrong. It seemed like a continuation of their Paris semifinal on much slower surface, many rallies, break points in each game, and Medvedev established a 3:0 lead – no break of serve for another two hours of the match. In the first tie-break a linesman helped Zverev considerably calling Medvedev’s foot fault on his second serve at 1-all. In the 2nd tie-break Zverev led 4:2, but Medvedev was well focused and aggressive. He wasted a double match point, but at 6-all played a well-constructed point from the baseline and forced Zverev’s error on the third match point. It’s fifth consecutive Medvedev’s win over Zverev (all within the past twelve months). “Definitely one of the matches to remember,” Medvedev said. “When you win 8/6 in the tie-break in the third, it was 4:2 for him so I was like okay, he serves a few aces it’s done. I made it 6:4 and I was like okay, that’s my moment now. It’s back to 6:6, you get really tight, because I wanted to make a brave move on the 6:5 second serve and volley, didn’t work out at all.”

Points won directly behind the serve: Medvedev 37/107 (34%), Zverev 36/109 (33%)… Total points: 112-104