Week 33

…2023…

Australian players Max Purcell [70] and Alexei Popyrin [58] faced off in the qualifying round, with Purcell clinching victory despite trailing *1:4 (15/40) in the third set. Just a few days later, they were on the brink of another potential encounter in the semifinals. Popyrin entered the main draw as a lucky loser due to Karen Khachanov‘s withdrawal (the Russian had intended to return to the tour after being sidelined since the French Open). The quarterfinals marked a noteworthy achievement for both Australians, as it was their best result in a Masters 1000 event, propelling them to their first entry into the Top 50 ranking. Purcell is the only serve-and-volleyer inside the Top 100 now. In the quarterfinal against world’s best player, he stayed only 7 times on the baseline behind the serve, and this constant attacking allowed him to lead 4:3 in the decider.
Novak Đoković embarked on his first trip to the United States in nearly two years. His absence from American soil was due to his vaccination status, as he remained the only player within the Top 100 who had opted not to be vaccinated. His return was triumphant; the greatest player of the Open Era, secured his second Cincinnati title (the first being in 2018) under extraordinary circumstances. This victory came after the longest ATP final in history, in which he dashed Carlos Alcaraz‘s perfect record of 8-0 in deciding third-set tie-breaks (12-0 when considering all levels).
Never before in the Open Era had there been such a significant age gap between the two best players in the world, with Đoković holding a 16-year seniority over his toughest current rival. The upcoming US Open holds an intriguing promise. It’s challenging to envision anyone else lifting the trophy, and it’s highly likely that this New York event will play a pivotal role in determining the season-ending top spot. ”It’s amazing playing against you, sharing the court with you, learning from you,” Alcaraz told Djokovic during the trophy ceremony. “This match was really close, but I learned a lot from a champion like you. So congratulations to you and your team.”

…1993…

Two summer tournaments, the equivalents of the current “ATP 500,” held in Indiana and Connecticut during the same week, served as the final preparation for the best players in the world before the US Open. This pattern persisted through the 1990s (New Haven vanished from the calendar in 1999, while Indianapolis moved to an earlier week of the season, and also disappeared ten years later). The Indiana event marked the emergence of Patrick Rafter, a relatively unknown 20-year-old serve-and-volleyer from Australia. He advanced to the semifinals after an all-tie-break marathon against the world’s top player, creating a sensation that opened the door for Jim Courier to regain the top spot. In the final, Courier finally found a way to defeat Boris Becker, having lost to the German in their previous six meetings.
In New Haven, the teenage sensation Andrei Medvedev confirmed his status as an all-court player. While he was initially associated with clay courts in his first twelve months on the tour, he reached the final in Halle on grass, and in Connecticut, he captured his first title on a hard court. This achievement was no fluke, as he ousted one of the biggest specialists on that surface, Andre Agassi, in a rain-interrupted battle during the semifinals. “I’ve never done anything like this before,” Medvedev said of his masterful serving vs Agassi (half of aces, 11, in the 1st set). “Not even in practice when there’s no one on the other side of the court.” A few moments after the final, a young boy approached the court to exchange a high-five with Medvedev; it was the son of his coach and future ATP player Alex Dolgopolov, who was just five years old at the time… The 7-time Grand Slam champion, Mats Wilander [575, WC], made his return to the court after a four-month hiatus, following his almost two-year absence. He lost 6-2, 5-7, 4-6 to Buff Farrow [409, qualifier], a 26-year-old American who in the 1980s could only dream of facing Wilander, the top player at the time. Farrow spent his time competing in Satellite tournaments during that era. This match marked only the second and final victory in Farrow’s ATP career.
…Finals 2023…
Cincinnati (Masters 1K; hard outdoors)
(2)🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. (1)🇪🇸Carlos Alcaraz 5-7, 7-6(7), 7-6(4) – 1 m.p.
…Finals 1993…
Indianapolis ($915; hard outdoors)
(2)🇺🇸Jim Courier d. (3)🇩🇪Boris Becker 7-5, 6-3
New Haven ($915K; hard outdoors)
(5)🇺🇦Andrei Medvedev d. (4)🇨🇿Petr Korda 7-5, 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | 1 Comment

Week 32

…2023…

The nearly 22-year-old Jannik Sinner has currently found himself in a fortunate position when it comes to draws. His recent performance at Wimbledon highlighted it; he impressively reached his first major semifinal without facing a single opponent from the Top 30 in the five matches he won, an uncommon feat (93 – the average ranking of his rivals). The Canadian Open was no different, as he clinched the title without having to confront a Top 10 player, which is equally unusual in a 56-draw. Moreover, in the round of 16, Sinner was granted a pass due to his opponent’s withdrawal. Nonetheless it seemed a matter of time he would clinch a Masters 1K title already two years ago when he reached the Miami final.
In the Toronto championship match he navigated past Alex de Minaur with relative ease. It’s worth noting that Sinner and De Minaur had crossed paths in a final four years prior, with Sinner emerging victorious in the NextGen. An intriguing twist was that “Demon” had been Sinner’s doubles partner during the Canadian Open, although the Italian/Australian duo suffered a defeat in the first round, which concluded in a super tie-break.
De Minaur – the highest ranked unseeded player – exhibited remarkable tenacity throughout the tournament. He notably rebounded from a set point down at 1:5* in the first set of the third round. Equally impressive was his comeback from a *1:5 deficit in a tie-break on the following day, with De Minaur securing “9/7” tie-breaks in the mentioned sets against higher-ranked opponents. The slender Australian has faced setbacks in his three recent ATP finals, all of which ended with rather one-sided defeats for him. Characterized as a counter-puncher lacking a robust acceleration on either wing, De Minaur’s strategy hinges on the missteps of more powerful players who wield dominant forehands. Unfortunately for him, they didn’t have bad days in this year’s finals (Queens Club, Los Cabos, Toronto).
The tournament also witnessed an impressive showing by tennis veterans who were once Top 10 mainstays. The 33-year-old Milos Raonic, buoyed by strong local support and holding a wild card ranking of 545, advanced to the third round, demonstrating his enduring prowess in the opening round. On the other hand, Gaël Monfils, four years Raonic’s senior and currently ranked 276 with a protected ranking, went a round further, with the distinction of being the sole player to capture a set off Sinner. Both Raonic and Monfils achieved victories against Top 10 players, reaffirming their competitive aptitude on the court… The support of local fans didn’t help Félix Auger-Aliassime to snap a bad streak. The Canadian has lost 8 out of his last 10 matches (four defeats in a row). At the end of 2022 he was the hottest player on the tour (three titles back-to-back), and I thought that with an improved backhand he’d attack the Top 5 this year, however, if the current form sustains, he will not finish this season in the Top 20.

…1993…

The early 1990s marked a noteworthy shift in tennis dynamics, as the importance of a powerful serve became more pronounced than ever before. This period led to discussions suggesting that taller players, at least 180 cm in height, would hold the significant advantage on faster surfaces. However, this theory faced a challenge during the ‘Mercedes Super 9’ events of summer ’93. In Montreal, Mikael Pernfors emerged triumphant, and in Cincinnati (Pernfors’ early exit), Michael Chang claimed the title; both players stood at a height of 173 cm (5’8”). Jason Stoltenberg found himself a victim of them both, facing defeat in the 2nd round in Montreal and the quarterfinals in Cincinnati. Chang’s last three matches proved demanding and unique in terms of total points won: the Chinese American won just two points more than Stoltenberg, ten points fewer against Andre Agassi (a surprising unseeded presence, his first after 76 consecutive events), and four points fewer than Stefan Edberg. A remarkable upset came from 23-year-old Steve Bryan [202, qualifier], who achieved the greatest success of his career by advancing to the quarterfinals. Bryan capitalized on Richard Krajicek‘s fatigue in the second round and stunned Andrei Medvedev the following day, only to face an insurmountable challenge in Pete Sampras, who was eliminated by Edberg in the match of the tournament. Edberg would again cross paths with Chang in the Cincy final the following year, that time resulting in a rather one-sided encounter.
As the best players converged in the United States to prepare for the US Open, one elite player diverged from the norm — Thomas Muster. Surveying the tournament’s draw, it was evident that defeating Muster in San Marino would be a daunting task. True to form, the Austrian navigated the week without dropping a single set. Yet, his final opponent, Renzo Furlan, elevated the competition, compelling Muster to invest two hours of effort before securing his 18th career title. Martín Jaite, no. 10 in 1990, played the last match of his career at the main-level at age of 29 in the “Italian” micro-state. Just one month later, he participated in a Challenger event in Venice, where he once again faced a first-round loss. This defeat marked his seventh consecutive loss, a streak that intensified the sense of bitterness and disappointment.
…Finals 2023…
Toronto (Masters 1K; hard outdoors)
(7)🇮🇹Jannik Sinner d. 🇦🇺Alex de Minaur 6-4, 6-1
…Finals 1993…
Cincinnati ($1.4M; hard outdoors)
(7)🇺🇸Michael Chang d. (3)🇸🇪Stefan Edberg 7-5, 0-6, 6-4
San Marino ($275K; clay outdoors)
(1)🇦🇹Thomas Muster d. (6)🇮🇹Renzo Furlan 7-5, 7-5
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 31

…2023…

Although the rain-interrupted final in the US capital featured seeded players, predicting this outcome at the start of the week would have been quite audacious. Both Daniel Evans and Tallon Griekspoor, with ages of 33 and 27 respectively, hadn’t previously competed at this level. Unfavorable weather conditions played a significant role; top-seeded Taylor Fritz had to endure two matches on Friday, lasting a total of 4 hours and 21 minutes. As a result, his energy was depleted by the mid-2nd set during the semifinal against Griekspoor. While Evans exhibits technical brilliance, his consistency has often been lacking. Arriving in Washington with a 1-8 record since his semifinal appearance in Barcelona in April, he dropped his opening set. However, he astonishingly turned the tide, securing ten consecutive sets without being seriously threatened. Reflecting on his journey, Evans remarked: “I wasn’t playing very well and I wasn’t happy with my game. To do the work I’ve done and to stick with it and come through is amazing. The last game sort of summed up my week. I got out of trouble [he saved four break points]. I really appreciate all the support.”
In the other hardcourt event of the week, Stefanos Tsitsipas improved his relatively modest finals record (10-17). He outplayed Alex de Minaur in the championship match, who had aimed to secure two titles this year in Mexico. Among the Head-to-Head matchups of elite players born in the 90s, the Tsitsipas vs. De Minaur rivalry is the most lopsided, with Tsitsipas leading 10-0 (including the NextGen final). Tsitsipas consistently dominates the encounters, often securing straightforward sets due to the overpowering speed of his forehand, which proves too daunting for De Minaur’s grinding style of play.
Dominic Thiem emerged as a contender for the world No. 1 spot following his victory at the US Open ’20 and his appearance in the ‘Masters’ final a few months later. However, subsequent injuries began to plague him, leading to an extended break, a dip in form, a parting of ways with his coach Nicolás Massú, as well as mounting frustration stemming from heart-wrenching defeats (for instance 6-7 to Tsitsipas twice in deciding sets this year). Finally, almost everything clicked for Thiem at his home Austrian event. Thiem, ranked 116th and competing as a wild card, adeptly navigated through challenging situations, particularly in the first round where he staved off seven set points across two sets, and in the semifinal where impressively, he overcame five match points. Despite his valiant efforts, Thiem found himself overmatched in the final against Sebastián Báez. The Argentinian, a diminutive player at 170 cm, has specialized in clay courts due to their reduced emphasis on serving. Worth noting is Alex Molčan‘s remarkable comeback, one of the most impressive “best of three” turnarounds in the Open Era. The talented left-handed Slovak rallied to defeat Sebastian Ofner 4-6, 7-5, 7-6 in round two, saving two match points at *0:5 in the 2nd set (with Ofner also leading 6:5*, 30/0 in the 3rd set).

…1993…

It’s a rare occurrence for a player to secure a title while being on the brink of defeat in three matches within a week (one game at least). This remarkable feat only happens once every few years, and it unfolded in California. Richard Krajicek [10] clinched his first title of the year despite being just 2, 4, and 2 points away from defeat in the second round, semifinal, and final, respectively. His journey was a nail-biting one, with moments of survival and resilience. In the second round, Krajicek faced a challenging battle against Jason Stoltenberg. After dropping the opening set, he found himself trailing 2:5 in the second-set tie-break. However, he managed to turn the tide and narrowly escaped defeat before destroying his opponent in the decider. The semifinals presented another intense serve-and-volley showdown, where Krajicek emerged victorious against Pete Sampras, marking his first triumph in their competitive Head-to-Head which ended 6-4 for the Dutchman. The final, lasting 2 hours and 38 minutes, witnessed an amazing turnaround. Despite a disastrous start (seven games lost in a row), Krajicek’s determination shone through. Although he was unable to break Michael Chang‘s serve in 15 tries, he displayed exceptional prowess in two tie-breaks. Notably, this encounter marked their third meeting where a deciding tie-break was essential, with Krajicek ultimately securing a 2-1 edge in those matches. Reflecting on his triumph, Krajicek revealed his mental approach, after changing his racket with the new balls: “I was thinking that a 6-0, 6-0 result in the final wouldn’t be satisfying. I told myself, ‘Now, I must make it happen. I need to take action to create a competitive match.’ With a fresh start and a new attitude, I pretended I was trailing 1:0 and chose to put the first set behind me.” Krajicek’s remarkable victory earned him a prize of $39,600 and a unique place in the history of the Los Angeles tournament. He became the first repeat winner since Jimmy Connors achieved the feat in 1973-74.
Kitzbühel. Thomas Muster, one of the biggest clay-court specialists of the 90s, only once triumphed in the biggest tournament on clay in his home country. He participated in 15 editions of the Austrian Open (regularly in the years 1984-1998, excluding 1989 when he was seriously injured, and again in 2011 when made a bizarre comeback at age of 44). Muster’s quest for victory in 1993 was an arduous one. Navigating through a challenging draw, Muster faced formidable opponents en route to the title. In the semifinal, he confronted Andrei Medvedev, a player he had previously struggled against, losing twice in a row in straights to him. In the final Muster faced Javier Sánchez, who had secured back-to-back wins against Muster in the events leading up to the clash in the Alpine town. Nine days earlier in the Hilversum quarterfinal, the member of the famous Spanish family defeated Muster 6-4, 5-7, 6-3, so the score of each set was repeated in their final, but all sets went to Muster’s account in a two-day contest (suspended on Sunday due to rain). Notably, this triumph came during a period when the tournament boasted a 48-player draw, later reduced to 32 in 2008. The event’s status fluctuated over the years, transitioning from an ATP 500 tournament to a Challenger event in 2010, and ultimately settling into a 28-player draw format starting in 2011.
Sergi Bruguera embarked on a distinctive path by skipping the grass-court season to continue his dominance on clay. While he experienced success in Gstaad, his journey was marked by surprising setbacks in Stuttgart and Hilversum. The city of Prague in the newly formatted Czech Republic, witnessed Bruguera’s triumphant display against Andrey Chesnokov in a two-hour final. Bruguera showcased his resilience by rallying from a 2:4 deficit in the opening set – the sole set during the entire week where he found himself trailing. This tournament also marked the emergence of Jiří Novák [584, WC], an 18-year-old Czech talent whose future achievements would solidify his legacy as one of his country’s finest players post the dissolution of Czechoslovakia. Novak won his ATP debut in a dramatic fashion, but in the second round got a lesson from Bruguera… Despite the lowest prize money in the week, Los Angeles attracted better players than two clay-court events.
…Finals 2023…
Washington (ATP 500; hard outdoors)
(9)🇬🇧Dan Evans d. (12)🇳🇱Tallon Griekspoor 7-5, 6-3
Los Cobos (ATP 250; hard outdoors)
(1)🇬🇷Stefanos Tsitsipas d. (5)🇦🇺Alex de Minaur 6-3, 6-4
Kitzbühel (ATP 250; clay outdoors)
🇦🇷Sebastián Báez d. (WC)🇦🇹Dominic Thiem 6-3, 6-1
…Finals 1993…
Los Angeles ($275K; hard outdoors)
(4)🇳🇱Richard Krajicek d. (3)🇺🇸Michael Chang 0-6, 7-6(3), 7-6(5)
Kitzbühel ($375K; clay outdoors)
(3)🇦🇹Thomas Muster d. (6)🇪🇸Javier Sánchez 6-3, 7-5, 6-4
Prague ($340K; clay outdoors)
(1)🇪🇸Sergi Bruguera d. (3)🇷🇺Andrey Chesnokov 7-5, 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 30

…2023…

It has been 15 years since the “German Open Tennis” lost its prestige and was downgraded from a Masters 1K event to an ATP 500 tournament. Alexander Zverev, a native of Hamburg, kickstarted his remarkable career in his birthplace back in 2014 when, as a 17-year-old boy, he made it to the semifinals. However, it took him nine long years to finally claim the championship trophy, marking his first title in a year and a half. The moment he clinched the victory was deeply emotional, as he fell to his knees with tears of joy in his eyes. “This is my home, where I grew up and started playing tennis,” Zverev expressed, overwhelmed with the significance of the win. “It was an incredible and emotional experience. I can’t find the right words to describe it; I’m just extremely happy right now. It feels almost like my first title again.” Due to adverse weather conditions, Zverev’s last two matches were played indoors, and impressively, he didn’t even have to face a tie-break throughout the week. This triumph marks his 20th title, with only three members of the “Big 4” having won more titles among active players.
The Australian players had a fantastic week as well, with Aleksandar Vukic (of Montenegrin origin) reaching the final in Atlanta and Alexei Popyrin (of Russian origin) capturing the title in Umag. Vukic’s unexpected journey in Georgia surprised many, given that he had mainly been competing at the Challenger level for several years, with just two ATP quarterfinals in his resume. On the other hand, Popyrin has found himself in the past few years hovering between the 70th and 100th rankings, alternating between Challengers and main-level events, occasionally having to play qualifying rounds for big tournaments. He possesses the skills that could easily put him among the Top 30 players in the world, he just needs to be consistent with his results. In the last set of the “Croatia Open”, he overcame cramps and a *3:4 (0/30) deficit… he was six points away from defeat also in a three-hour semifinal. Worth noting: 17-year-old Dino Prižmić, ranked 287th, reached the quarterfinals in Umag in only his second main-level appearance, both of which occurred on Croatia’s Istrian peninsula. Meanwhile, his renowned compatriot, Marin Čilić, 17 years his senior, returned to the tour after a seven-month absence (knee surgery) during which he dropped from no. 17 to 100 in the rankings. Taylor Fritz, who claimed a title in the first event during the Summer season on hardcourts in North America, wasted two match points in the 2nd set of the final – the same happened to him earlier this year as he’d triumphed at Delray Beach.

…1993…

Thirty years later, it is still baffling how Mikael Pernfors triumphed in Montreal without having won an ATP title for nearly five years. Pernfors, a runner-up in the 1986 French Open, was once regarded as part of the broader elite group in the second half of the 1980s. However, a series of injuries, including knee and tendon issues from the early 1990s, hampered his progress, and he had managed only two minor titles at the main level. At one point, his ranking dropped as low as No. 1095 forcing him to seek points in the Satellites. However, the resilient 30-year-old made a comeback to the Top 100, thanks to three Challenger titles. His Canadian victory over Jason Stoltenberg in the second round was already considered an upset, but then he achieved the unimaginable by defeating the World No. 2, Jim Courier, with a convincing score of 6-3, 6-2. Notably, just a few months earlier, Pernfors had lost to Courier 0-6, 3-6 at Key Biscayne. Courier admitted: “Everything was wrong. Mikael played very well and let me beat myself.” This win bolstered Pernfors’ self-confidence, enabling him to overcome higher-ranked left-handed opponents in straight sets in his next two matches. Pernfors’ last hurdle was the 23-year-old Todd Martin, who reached a career-best achievement at that time by advancing to the final. Initially, the tall American seemed to have the match in the bag, given his height advantage of 25 cm, superior serving, and aggressive receiving. Despite Martin leading 5:2* in the decider, he faltered due to tentative play, allowing Pernfors to seize the opportunity with his agility. Consequently, Pernfors secured the title after an impressive comeback, arguably the best in his career. Unfortunately, for Martin, he was never again as close to winning a tournament featuring the world’s best players during the next ten years, while Pernfors returned to the position he held before that miraculous week in Canada. At the end of 1993, Pernfors won a Challenger event in Bermuda, actually marking the end of his career.
In an upset during the second round in Hilversum, Sergi Bruguera was eliminated in straight sets by the crowd favorite, Paul Haarhuis; the Dutchman often raised his level of play with the enthusiastic support of the home crowd. Although only one seeded player advanced to the quarterfinals, the lineup of the last eight was still strong, comprising players who had all previously won ATP titles. The final saw Carlos Costa dominate Magnus Gustafsson, snapping his 9-match winning streak, as Costa rediscovered his 1992 form when established himself as a clay-court specialist. However, his mixed participation on clay, grass, carpet, and hardcourts had a negative impact on his clay-court performances the following year.
…Finals 2023…
Hamburg (ATP 500; clay semi-outdoors)
(4)🇩🇪Alexander Zverev d. 🇷🇸Laslo Đere 7-5, 6-3
Umag (ATP 250; clay outdoors)
🇦🇺Alexei Popyrin d. (6)🇨🇭Stan Wawrinka 6-7(5), 6-3, 6-4
Atlanta (ATP 250; hard outdoors)
(1)🇺🇸Taylor Fritz d. 🇦🇺Aleksandar Vukic 7-5, 6-7(5), 6-4
…Finals 1993…
Montreal ($1.4M; hard outdoors)
🇸🇪Mikael Pernfors d. (13)🇺🇸Todd Martin 2-6, 6-2, 7-5
Hilversum ($235K; clay outdoors)
🇪🇸Carlos Costa d. 🇸🇪Magnus Gustafsson 6-1, 6-2, 6-3
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 29

…2023…

Since 1987, it has been a tradition for Gstaad and Newport to be the first events after Wimbledon. Båstad replaced Boston as the third post-Wimbledon event in 1990. Historically, better players chose Switzerland over Sweden, but it was not the case this year; four top 20 players arrived at the Swedish coast, while no one from the Top 20 in the Swiss Alps. Casper Ruud, who had won Gstaad twice in a row, chose Båstad this time (he likes to collect ATP 250 titles). However, in the final, he faced Andrey Rublev, who has been super consistent this year, and the Russian claimed his 14th title. In Gstaad, Pedro Cachin [90] captured his maiden title. The 28-year-old Argentinian was little known prior to this year, but reaching the fourth round in Madrid certainly helped him believe he could win an ATP title. “In the beginning of the match, I was a little nervous and made a few mistakes. It was the first time I had played against a lefty in the tournament, but I stayed there,” Cachin said after the final, in which four points separated him from defeat. “I tried to be positive, more aggressive, and go to the net. In a final, it is difficult to play like this the whole match. I am very, very happy.” The Hopman Cup has returned to the tennis calendar after a four-year absence. The event, which was traditionally held in Perth (January) from 1989 to 2019 for eight teams, has been moved to Nice (July), with the hardcourt surface replaced by clay, and six teams were invited for the new opening. The Hopman Cup represents an exhibition status, so the two biggest stars (Carlos Alcaraz, Holger Rune) didn’t seem to be playing at their 100%. As a consequence, they didn’t push their teams to the final. Croats (Donna Vekić, Borna Ćorić) took advantage of it, however, they had to save a match point in mixed doubles against Spain to move through to the final. Croatia had won that event once before, in 1996 (Iva Majoli, Goran Ivanišević)… 37-year-old Kevin Anderson decided to come back to the tour after more than a year break, and advanced to the quarterfinal in Newport. Two teenagers noticed good results this week: Serb Hamad Međedović [183] advanced to the Gstaad semifinal (he actually turned 20 during the week) while one year younger Alex Michelsen [190] of the United States, played the Newport final in his just second main-level appearance. The current best Swedish player, Mikael Ymer [51] couldn’t play in his home country tournament because he has been suspended for 18 months for violating anti-doping rules: “I find it difficult to comprehend that they found an 18 month suspension to be a just punishment. I do not believe I broke those rules and my conscience is clear with God as my witness.” He is another suspended Top 100 player following Polish Kamil Majchrzak who cannot play in 2023. 

…1993…

Sergi Bruguera was the main favorite to win the title in Stuttgart. He was on a 15-match winning streak, not being seriously threatened in the meantime. So it was quite shocking that he wilted in the third set against his compatriot (Basque though), Alberto Berasategui [91]. Berasategui was little known at the time, but this victory gave him wings, and he began to be one of the most dangerous clay-courters; in 1994, he advanced to the French Open final, where he lost to… Bruguera. Magnus Gustafsson, who claimed the biggest title of his career, came back from a 2:4 deficit in the deciding set of the final. At 4-all, he fought off three mini-match points with the help of his ad-court serve, delivered from an extreme position, close to the tramlines. The 1992 edition of The Mercedes Cup gathered the best line-up in history, but the following year wasn’t bad either – there were three Top 10 players. “Probably the best I’ve played in three years,” Amos Mansdorf told the crowd of 7,041 after triumphing in Washington D.C. “At this point in my career, I’m very much in control out there. I know when the big point is coming, and I was ready today every time we played a big point. Playing 10 years on the tour helped with that.” The 28-year-old Mansdorf saved three set points in the opener. “He’s had a couple of early losses lately, and everyone on the tour takes notice of that – that Lendl isn’t invincible anymore,” said Robbie Weiss [138] after a 2-6, 7-6, 6-4 second-round win over Ivan Lendl. It was Lendl’s sixth defeat in seven matches – at the time it was pretty obvious that the time of the best player of the 80s, then 33 years old, is counted, and he couldn’t be considered among favorites to win the biggest titles anymore.
…Finals 2023…
Bastad (ATP 250; clay outdoors)
(2)🇷🇺Andrey Rublev d. (1)🇳🇴Casper Ruud 7-6(3), 6-0
Gstaad (ATP 250; clay outdoors)
🇦🇷Pedro Cachin d. 🇪🇸Albert Ramos Viñolas 3-6, 6-0, 7-5
Newport (ATP 250; grass outdoors)
(2)🇫🇷Adrian Mannarino d. 🇺🇸Alex Michelsen 6-2, 6-4
“Hopman Cup” – Nice, clay outdoors
Croatia d. Switzerland 2-0
…Finals 1993…
Stuttgart ($915K; clay outdoors)
(16)🇸🇪Magnus Gustafsson d. (2)🇩🇪Michael Stich 6-3, 6-4, 3-6, 4-6, 6-4
Washington ($500K; hard outdoors)
(8)🇮🇱Amos Mansdorf d. (7)🇺🇸Todd Martin 7-6(3), 7-5

Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 27-28 (Wimbledon)

…2023…

Players who were supposed to face each other in the semifinals a year before, Rafael Nadal and Nick Kyrgios, withdrew from this year’s Wimbledon. Nadal’s absence was confirmed even before the French Open, while Kyrgios pulled out after the draw was made. If the ATP points had been given last year, Nadal would have been disappeared from the ranking now. Another potential quarterfinalist, Karen Khachanov, didn’t participate as he was expecting the birth of his second child. 36-year-old Jérémy Chardy (ranked 542nd, so not enough to even play main-level qualifying rounds), who did not play at all in 2022, used his protected ranking wisely this year. He chose only a few biggest events. In the first round in London, he found himself on Centre Court against the world’s top-ranked player, and he saw it as a good opportunity to ‘bid adieu’.
The first week of the event was quite challenging due to adverse weather conditions. Rain disrupted play on the second day, leading to a peculiar situation where two players advanced to the third round while several first-round matches didn’t even start.
Overall, it was a fascinating event showcasing a clash of three generations. The semifinals (both played indoors) featured the three distinctively best players of the season, each representing a different generation: Novak Đoković (born 1987), Daniil Medvedev (born 1996), and Carlos Alcaraz (born 2003). Jannik Sinner found himself in the best four at a major for the first time, benefiting from an easy draw. However, considering recent years, he deserved a favorable draw (four times had lost major quarterfinals, three times to the eventual champions). Đoković easily prevented what many believed could be the first chapter of a future rivalry on the biggest stages between Alcaraz and Sinner. Personally, I’m more skeptical about that and see Holger Rune (quarter-finalist this edition) as more gifted than Sinner, with a brighter future ahead for the Dane.
The final was an electrifying battle between two mental giants separated by 16 years, marking the second-largest age gap in the Open Era as far as the finals are concerned (Jimmy Connors destroyed 18 years older Ken Rosewall in two major finals in 1974). Alcaraz started the final in a worse fashion than anyone could have expected, but he then won all the crucial points, including a marathon game in the mid-3rd set, consisted of 13 deuces, which is the longest in Wimbledon finals. Alcaraz is a complete player, and I expect him to follow in the footsteps of Björn Borg, becoming the first man since the early ’80s to win Roland Garros and Wimbledon titles in the same season a few times.
The event was also notable for Russian players, who were unable to compete the previous year due to political reasons. Three Russians reached the quarterfinals, including Roman Safiullin [92], who hadn’t even played an ATP final yet. Andrey Rublev lost at this stage for the eighth time, securing him an infamous record in this regard.

…1993…

Sergi Bruguera [5] played more clay-court matches than anyone else before Wimbledon ’93. After claiming his first major title, he made the decision to skip the grass-court season. As a result, he arrived in Swiss Alps feeling fresh and was not only the favorite to win the title, people expected him to do so without dropping a set. And that’s exactly what he did. His hunger for tennis and freshness were particularly evident on Sunday. Due to rain, his semifinal was suspended at 3-all in the first set. After the resumption, he won nine straight games and started the final an hour later with great energy. Similar to the previous year, he won the final in two sets (normally the finals of the event were in ‘best of five’ format until 2007). “I feel like I’m improving from year to year, and the win in Paris has significantly boosted my self-confidence,” said Bruguera. “The last five times we met, I beat him (Novacek) quite easily, so I guess he didn’t know how to handle me.” 8-0 in their H2H in the end.
In the Swedish summer resort of Båstad, players of lower rankings participated, compared to those who came to Switzerland that week. Despite having six Swedes seeded, none of them advanced to the final. The tournament concluded with the victory of Horst Skoff, ranked 82nd at the time, securing his fourth and final title. Although he was only 25 years old, Skoff was already past his prime, and two years later, he would lose his status of a main-level player. The runner-up, four years older Ronald Agénor, played eighth and last ATP final in his career, but he would enjoy a better year 1994 than Skoff. En route to the final Agénor scored a win over Lars Jönsson with the help of the longest deciding tie-break of the season (14/12)… Jan Gunnarsson [342, lucky loser], the Aussie Open ’89 semifinalist, struggling a few years with a knee injury, played his last ATP match at age of 31 losing in the second round.
In the last grass-court event of the season in Newport, where only three Top 100 players entered the draw, 19-year-old Greg Rusedski [151], lifted the trophy after a week of hard work. The left-handed Canadian showcased a lethal serve in his sixth main-level event, playing eight tie-breaks and registering a 5-3 record in them. His last two matches were closely contested, with both almost going the full distance in terms of the scoreline. In the semifinals, he won a no-break point match against Alex Antonitsch 7-6, 6-7, 7-6. In the second set of the all lefty final, he squandered two match points, and his opponent served for the match at 5:4 in the third set but failed to close it out. These dramatic matches became a recurring theme in Rusedski’s career, as he was regularly involved in similar encounters over the years (25-20 in deciding third-set tie-breaks towards the end of his career). This victory marked only the second time a Canadian won a main-level title, with the previous occurrence being Mike Belkin‘s triumph at St. Petersburg in 1971. Rusedski gained crucial confidence at Wimbledon ’93 where he faced one of the best grass-court specialists in history and narrowly lost in a tight four-set match. Top seeded, the double Newport defending champion Bryan Shelton was ousted in the first round.
…Finals 2023…
WIMBLEDON (£44.7M; grass semi-outdoors)
(1)🇪🇸Carlos Alcaraz d. (2)🇷🇸Novak Đoković 1-6, 7-6(6), 6-1, 3-6, 6-4
…Finals 1993…
Gstaad ($375K; clay outdoors) – Week 27
(1)🇪🇸Sergi Bruguera d. (3)🇨🇿Karel Nováček 6-3, 6-4
Bastad ($235K; clay outdoors)
🇦🇹Horst Skoff d. 🇭🇹Ronald Agénor 7-5, 1-6, 6-0
Newport ($175K; grass outdoors)
🇨🇦Greg Rusedski d. (3)🇦🇷Javier Frana 7-5, 6-7(7), 7-6(5)
Richard Fromberg [40] emerged as the standout player that Davis Cup quarterfinal weekend (16-18.07… Week 28), winning two vital matches – as the only one – he did it without dropping a set. In the decisive rubber against Stefano Pescosolido in Florence, Italy, Fromberg secured a victory of 7-5, 6-1, 6-4 for Australia. The tall Aussie had played in the Davis Cup final already three years before. Meanwhile, there was a major upset in Fréjus (small city at Côte d’Azur), where Henri Leconte‘s poor performance due to back problems in the first two days, led the team captain to assign Rodolphe Gilbert (his lone Davis Cup appearance) to face the experienced Ramesh Krishnan [231] in the decisive rubber. The match was suspended due to darkness with a 4-all score on Sunday and resumed on Monday; in just 13 minutes, Krishnan sealed the victory with a scoreline of 2-6, 6-4, 4-6, 7-5, 6-4. “When we arrived here, we didn’t expect to be in this position,” Krishnan remarked. “France was a much stronger team, but it was an excellent opportunity for us.” Gilbert had had a 4:2* lead on Sunday before the match was halted, and he wasted two mini-match points on the following day.
In the Hague, the absence of the injured Jacco Eltingh proved detrimental to the Dutch team. Without him, they were unable to secure the expected point in doubles. Richard Krajicek also disappointed by losing in straight sets to Magnus Larsson, resulting in the tie being decided on Saturday. On the same day, Germany secured their place in the semifinals in the only grass court tie of the weekend (the other three were on clay). The clash of neighbours in Halle was highly entertaining, featuring 13 out of a possible 15 sets in the first two days, with five of them going to tie-breaks. Michael Stich defeated Karel Nováček in a rain-interrupted battle that was suspended at 3-all in the second set. Nováček was close to defaulting, had a 30/0 lead on Stich’s serve at 5-all in the deciding set but failed to break; frustrated by some line calls in that crucial game, he expressed his anger by throwing a towel towards the umpire during the last change of ends. Ultimately only a point was deducted from him.
Quarterfinals (host first)
Italy – Australia 2-3, France – India 2-3, Netherlands – Sweden 1-4, Germany – Czechia 4-1
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 26

…1993…

Wimbledon ’93: in my opinion the most significant major of the ’90s. Admittedly, Pete Sampras came to London as the No. 1 player in the world, but with only one Grand Slam triumph, which he captured three years earlier (US Open ’90). Sampras’ right shoulder had been bothering him before the tournament, almost forcing him to withdraw, and it reminded him of its presence a couple of times in the first few rounds (especially in the opening match when he was close to trailing 1-2 in sets against a much inferior player). However, ultimately, it wasn’t an obstacle for him to play nearly perfect tennis in the second week, having an antidote for different styles he faced: Sampras defeated Andre Agassi (the defending champion; an offensive baseliner), Boris Becker (a three-time former champion; a serve-and-volleyer), and Jim Courier (the best player of the past two years; a mix of both styles earlier mentioned) in back-to-back matches! It must have been a tremendous boost of self-confidence that allowed him to dominate at the All-England Lawn Tennis & Croquet Club for the next seven years. Moreover, it halted Courier’s momentum in the early 90s. Admittedly, he was only 23, but he already achieved something that no one had done since 1969; he reached the major finals in Australia, France & England within a season (no one could repeat it until Roger Federer surpassed Courier by reaching all major finals in 2006). Besides he was the youngest man to play all four Slam finals. At the time, it was incomprehensible that “versatile” Courier wouldn’t play another Slam final, yet he did not reach one for another six years of his career.
At a lower level of American tennis, there was another significant encounter that year at Wimbledon which altered the paths of two careers. Todd Martin defeated David Wheaton in a dramatic five-set match in the fourth round. Subsequently, Martin thrived in the ’90s and ultimately became the fifth-best US player of that generation, something which Wheaton could have taken for granted as he triumphed in the most lucrative event of the 90s (Grand Slam Cup ’91). Martin won two five-setters against big servers in back-to-back matches when it seemed he was destined to lose in four sets. In the third round, he escaped from *2:4 (0/40) in the fourth set against Goran Ivanišević. Against Wheaton, Martin faced an arguably tougher situation as he trailed 0:3 with a double break down in the fourth set. Ivanišević fell victim to playing too many sets, having gone to the maximum of 15 sets in the first three rounds, barely winning the first two matches (he saved four mini-match points in the first round and a match point in the second round – with a second serve ace; both extremes occurred in fifth sets he won respectively 6-4 and 9-7). A similar fate awaited Michael Chang, who was not considered among the favorites, unlike Ivanišević. Chang, who had won two five-setters 6-4 in the fifth sets, lost 4-6 in the fifth set to Wheaton after 4 hours and 22 minutes, which remained the longest match of the event until the end of that edition.
Andrew Foster [332] became a second-rate hero of the event. The 21-year-old Brit, playing thanks to a wild card, advanced to the fourth round where he almost stole a set from Sampras (led *5:3 in a tie-break), giving joy to the local fans who were hopelessly awaiting their own representative in the quarterfinals of the years 1974-95. Foster finished his career with the highest ranking at 184 (only one Challenger final), which is extremely low for someone who reached the “sweet sixteen” at majors, but it was the reality of the first three decades of the Open Era: serve-and-volley players could compete on equal terms on grass against much higher-ranked opponents who were not familiar with this style of play. Foster was very fortunate in the third round because his opponent Andrey Olhovskiy (who’d caused the biggest sensation of 1992 by defeating Courier at Wimbledon) withdrew midway through their match, complaining of flu-like symptoms.
A few more words about the defending champion – Agassi. Since the late 80s known for some controversies, Agassi shocked that time with a new technique of his serve (shortened preparation with his arm, caused by wrist injury; he displayed it for the first time actually a few weeks earlier during his early upset in Halle) and an alleged relationship with Barbra Streisand, famous American actress & singer, 28 years his senior. She was sitting in a box during his matches along with his brother and the closest friend. “We are simply people who enjoy being around each other and we’ve been around each other in all circumstances,” he explained.

…2023…

The last two grass events prior to Wimbledon are of little importance. Only two Top 10 players decided to participate in them, and both were ousted in their opening matches. This created opportunities for lower-ranked players to enhance their modest collection of titles. Francisco Cerúndolo [19], who won in Eastbourne, captured his second title, while Christopher Eubanks [77], the best in Mallorca (these particular grass courts tend to lose their lush green appearance and become more bare and patchy already after a few days of playing), secured his maiden title. Cerúndolo’s victory marks the first time an Argentine has won an ATP title on grass since 1995 (Javier Frana in Nottingham). He made one of the best comebacks of the season in the semifinals, as he trailed Mackenzie McDonald 2-6, 1:4 with a double break. Eubanks was on the verge of losing two matches: first in the second round, where he was two points away from defeat, and then in the semifinals, where he needed to save five match points (including a triple match point) against Lloyd Harris. “It just means the world, man,” Eubanks said. “[…] It’s just a testament to the hard work. Now I just want to keep working even harder to experience this feeling even more.” Eubanks, who was relatively unknown until the end of the previous season, showcased his potential to make an impact earlier this year in Miami when he advanced to the quarterfinals as a qualifier. He is the tallest player (201 cm) I’ve seen so far who operates with one-handed topspin backhand… 42-year-old Feliciano López [634] played his farewell tournament in Mallorca, advancing to the quarterfinal (the oldest ATP quarter-finalist since 43 y.o. Jimmy Connors in Halle ’95). The Spaniard retires with one interesting record which I assume will not be beaten – the most consecutive Slam appearances (79). He played his first main-level event in Barcelona ’98, the Slam record he manufactured between French Open ’02 and Australian Open ’22.
…Finals 1993…
WIMBLEDON ($3.5M; grass outdoors) – week 25/26
(1)🇺🇸Pete Sampras d. (2)🇺🇸Jim Courier 7-6(3), 7-6(6), 3-6, 6-3
…Finals 2023…
Eastbourne (ATP 250; grass outdoors)
(4)🇦🇷Francisco Cerúndolo d. (2)🇺🇸Tommy Paul 6-4, 1-6, 6-4
Mallorca (ATP 250; grass outdoors)
🇺🇸Christopher Eubanks d. (4)🇫🇷Adrian Mannarino 6-1, 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 25

…2023…

Westphalia: Alexander Bublik [48] possesses a pair of soft hands and one of the fastest serves on the tour. With these two attributes, a player can realistically aspire to achieve significant results on grass. Everything fell into place this week for the talented Russian, representing Kazakhstan, as he defeated four former or current ~Top 10 players. This marks the biggest title in the history of Kazakhstani tennis. However, thirteen years ago, Andrey Golubev also triumphed in a German event of the same level, held in Hamburg on clay. Golubev had to win six matches compared to Bublik’s five, but Bublik faced much tougher opposition in Halle. In the ultimate game, he committed three double faults within six points, but he didn’t let it affect his serving and fired a 220 kph second-serve ace on championship point. “It really means the world to me,” said Bublik. “I’ve been struggling for half a year and now having this a reward, I don’t take it for granted. It was hard work.” Andrey Rublev avenges that defeat in the Wimbledon ’23 fourth round after a dramatic five-setter. Another native Russian speaker with the name “Alexander“, who doesn’t represent Russia, is Zverev. He has dealt with his fair share of challenges. The German struggled after his comeback from a serious injury but managed to reach the semifinals in his last three events. As a result, he has climbed back to around the Top 20. During the French Open, dropping outside the Top 50 was a significant concern for him, but he won his third-round match under quite fortunate circumstances.
England (London): Carlos Alcaraz claimed his first title on grass. In his opening match, he was just three points away from a straight-sets defeat but managed to survive, improving his 3rd set (deciding) tie-break record to 7-0. He displayed impressive tennis in the subsequent rounds, leaving his opponents with no chance. “I want to look up to the best players on grass and their movement. On grass, Roger and Andy are the best players who move exceptionally well. I want to be the same, like them,” he said. I expected him to win Wimbledon already last year, and I will be surprised if he doesn’t capture a few Wimbledon titles in this decade…. Matteo Berrettini, the Wimbledon ’21 runner-up and back-to-back grass court title winner last year (Stuttgart, Queen’s Club), is currently facing a major crisis. He suffered a swift defeat in his first-round match in Stuttgart and subsequently withdrew from the title defense in London. Dark clouds also loom over Maxime Cressy. As the only serve-and-volleyer in the Top 100 (although I’d say “pseudo S/V” because he has achieved a few notable results mainly due to the chaos he creates by serving his second serves at the speed of his first serves), he has now lost 11 matches in a row, including 11 consecutive sets.

…1993…

First week of Wimbledon ’93: Only half of the possible number of seeded players managed to advance through the qualifying event, with none of the top 10 seeds making it. Among those who qualified were Patrick Rafter [178] and Greg Rusedski [155], who would face each other in the US Open final four years later. Due to bad weather, the third round was played as a “best of three” instead of “best of five” format. The official Wimbledon record for aces at the time was 37, set by Goran Ivanišević a year earlier in the final. However, during the first round of the qualifying event in ’93, a left-handed, blonde long-haired South African, Gary Muller, fired 54 aces (!) as he defeated Peter Lundgren 4-6, 7-6, 20-18. To this day, it remains an unofficial record for the most aces served in a three-set match. The official record for the most aces in a match is held by Ivo Karlović: 45 aces in Halle 2015 as he won his match 7-5, 6-7, 6-3.
…Finals 2023…
Halle (ATP 500; grass semi-outdoors)
🇰🇿Alexander Bublik d. (3)🇷🇺Andrey Rublev 6-3, 3-6, 6-3
Queens Club (ATP 500; grass outdoors)
(1)🇪🇸Carlos Alcaraz d. (7)🇦🇺Alex de Minaur 6-4, 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 24

…2023…

It has been eight years since the pre-Wimbledon season on grass was extended from two to three weeks. In theory, to reach the Top 10, you should perform well in different conditions. From this perspective, Frances Tiafoe‘s advancement to the elite group this week makes sense. The 25-year-old American has reached finals on hard courts (both indoor and outdoor) as well as on clay in both Europe and the USA. Now, he has passed the test on grass by claiming his third title in his first grass-court final (Stuttgart). In that final, he saved a match point with a backhand winner down the line. The runner-up, Jan-Lennard Struff, is still deprived of an ATP title. His third failed attempt to raise the trophy must be very painful because he wasn’t broken in the final, fired 28 aces, and almost saved a third championship point for his opponent in exceptional circumstances (he responded to an overhead with a good passing shot, but Tiafoe’s lunge volley proved to be decisive). Richard Gasquet notched his 600th career win. Among active players, only three have won more matches. Gasquet expressed his happiness with this achievement in his on-court interview, saying, “It’s a big accomplishment for me. It’s incredible to achieve it. I’ve played 20 years on the Tour, and to win 600 matches is a big deal for me. I’m very happy with this milestone, and of course, I will try to win some more.”
In the Netherlands, the top-seeded players were eliminated in the first two rounds, which opened up an opportunity for lower-ranked players to capture their first grass-court title. Jordan Thompson, similarly to Struff, is seeking his maiden title and came close to achieving it. In his second final (previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch too), he was just three points away from experiencing the moment of glory. However, Tallon Griekspoor [38] usually plays his better tennis in front of the home crowd, and it elevated his performance at crucial moments of the final.
The week marked the comebacks of three finalists of major events who had been out of the game for a long time: Milos Raonic, Kei Nishikori (both sidelined for almost two years, disappeared from the ranking), and Nick Kyrgios (seven months of absence). Raonic, who reached the second round in Den Bosch, and Kyrgios, who was eliminated in the first round of Stuttgart, had early exits…
…while Nishikori had a much better comeback, but instead of participating in an ATP event, he chose a Challenger “75” in Puerto Rico which he won rather easily (appears in the newest ranking at 492). Andy Murray, the former world’s best player, wants to go far at Wimbledon this year. To increase his chances he needs to be seeded, thus he decided to skip the French Open and play two British “125” Challengers on grass (Surbiton, Nottingham). He won both tournaments without being seriously threatened, dropping just one set in the fortnight.
…1993…
The first edition of the Halle grass-court event, which is still held thirty years later, was marked by one day of suspension due to rain; the following year, the retractable roof was installed at the Gerry Weber Stadion (OWL Arena since 2021). Henri Leconte captured his ninth and last title, four years and eight months after his previous one in Brussels ’88. The 30-year-old left-handed Frenchman experienced a drastic drop in the ATP ranking from 65 to 141 after the French Open ’93 first round loss (the semifinalist in 1992). However, his title and fourth-round performance at Wimbledon allowed him to climb back to the Top 70 within three weeks. It turned out to be his ‘swan song’ as he would never play at the same stage in an ATP or Slam event again. In Halle, Leconte won four matches in deciding sets (two match points saved in the quarterfinal) before securing an emphatic final win over the eleven years younger Andrei Medvedev, who was gaining valuable experience on various surfaces (his professional debut on grass), solidifying his position of the potential future no. 1. It was his first lost final after collecting five titles.
Wally Masur lost back-to-back grass finals. In Manchester, he had no chance against fellow Australian Jason Stoltenberg [111]. Stoltenberg, once considered a prodigy, had to wait five years to clinch his maiden title. Earlier in 1993, frustrated with his results at the main level, Stoltenberg decided to play a few Challengers and won two of them (Indian Wells, Taipei – both on hardcourts), which certainly helped boost his self-confidence.
Those players who preferred clay over grass stayed in Italy, moving north from Tuscany to Liguria, and the field in Genoa was almost a copy of Florence’s event. The top three seeds remained the same in both tournaments, and the highest-ranked [15] Thomas Muster triumphed twice, dropping a set in each event against unseeded opponents. In the 1-hour 45-minute Genoa final, Muster fought off five set points in the opener. It was the third straight year that Muster spent two successive weeks in Italy, and the second year in a row he was easily defeated by an inferior player in the first round of Wimbledon (in 1991, he skipped the biggest grass event altogether).
…Finals 2023…
Stuttgart (ATP 250; grass outdoors)
(3)🇺🇸Frances Tiafoe d. 🇩🇪Jan-Lennard Struff 4-6, 7-6(1), 7-6(8) – 1 m.p.
‘s-Hertogenbosch (ATP 250; grass outdoors)
(6)🇳🇱Tallon Griekspoor d. 🇦🇺Jordan Thompson 6-7(4), 7-6(3), 6-3
…Finals 1993…
Halle ($350K; grass outdoors)
🇫🇷Henri Leconte d. (1)🇺🇦Andrei Medvedev 6-2, 6-3
Manchester ($275K; grass outdoors)
🇦🇺Jason Stoltenberg d. (4)🇦🇺Wally Masur 6-1, 6-3
Genoa ($275K; clay outdoors)
(1)🇦🇹Thomas Muster d. (3)🇸🇪Magnus Gustafsson 7-6(3), 6-4
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Week 22-23 (French Open)

…2023…

First and foremost, Rafael Nadal, the 14-time French Open champion (played each year since 2005), pulled out of the event, and on the day of his 37th birthday, he underwent surgery on his hip (psoas muscle). Other players who were potential seeds but withdrew include Pablo Carreño Busta, Marin Čilić, Matteo Berrettini, and Nick Kyrgios – all former major semifinalists at least. Nadal’s absence created a great opportunity for Novak Đoković, who had previously lost to Nadal eight times in Paris, always from the quarterfinals onwards.
When the draw was made, it seemed that Carlos Alcaraz would be the only player capable of defeating the 36-year-old Serb. They met in the semifinals, co-creating a fascinating contest for more than two hours. However, spasms attacked Alcaraz’s entire body at the beginning of set 3, and for the rest of the match, he was a shadow of himself. The young Spaniard has an impressive record this year (35-4), but three of his four defeats came as a result of cramps, which must be a cause for concern for him, his team, and his fans.
The first few days of the tournament brought two surprises as players who were anticipated to be potential semifinalists lost five-set matches to much lower-ranked opponents. Daniil Medvedev was defeated by Thiago Seyboth Wild [172, qualifier] on Chatrier, and Jannik Sinner wasted two match points in the fourth set (one after a net-cord) in a 5-hour 26-minute thriller against Daniel Altmeier [79] on Lenglen. This match became the fifth-longest in the tournament’s history. In another exciting five-setter of the first week, Andrea Vavassori prevailed against Miomir Kecmanović, winning sets 3-5 in tie-breaks. This has only happened once before at Grand Slams, in 1983. Additionally, Vavassori’s ability to fight off match points in sets 3 and 5 is a unique achievement, which has been seen only a few times before in the Open Era.
Juan Pablo Varillas [94] became the fifth man in the tournament’s modern history to win the opening three rounds after five-set matches. In the third round, he ousted another marathon man, Hubert Hurkacz, the only Pole in the Top 100, who has played five-setters in his last six major encounters! Đoković didn’t impress in the first week, but he finally found his best form in a tie-break of the quarterfinals, facing a scare of being down two sets. From that moment onwards, he played great tennis, especially considering his age of 36. The legendary John McEnroe even stated that Đoković at 36 is better than ever. The Serb has now won 23 major titles. With Roger Federer‘s retirement (20 major titles) and Nadal’s serious injury (22 major titles), it marks a defining moment in tennis history. It is highly unlikely that either of Đoković’s two biggest rivals would add another major title to their resume, particularly in Federer’s case. This effectively settles the dispute regarding who is the greatest male player of all time, often referred to as the ‘GOAT’… The beaten finalist, Casper Ruud, reminds me of Sergi Bruguera, the double champion at Roland Garros thirty years ago. Ruud’s game style is based on patience, physical capacity, and penetrating forehand topspins. The significant difference between Ruud and Bruguera lies in the quality of their final opponents in Paris. Ruud, in back-to-back finals, faced arguably the two greatest players in history and the best two on clay too. Karen Khachanov, one of the most solid players at majors lately (two hardcourt semifinals & a claycourt quarterfinal), comes back to the Top 10 after 3.5 years which marks three Russians in the Top 10 for the first time in history… The weather was beautiful throughout the fortnight in Paris, with the main arena remaining uncovered for the entire duration.

…1993…

There were a few heroes of the event, some of them short-lived. The first one was the unknown Stéphane Huet [297, qualifier]. The 22-year-old Frenchman, without a win at the main level, stunned Ivan Lendl, who had been undefeated in the first round at Roland Garros since 1978! However, Huet was eliminated in his next match by a qualifier, Fernando Meligeni [167], who hadn’t won a major match before. Nevertheless, the Brazilian advanced to the fourth round, marking a breakthrough event for him. He enjoyed a successful career afterward, with a notable highlight in Paris six years later when he reached the semifinal.
Similarly to Huet, other French lefty Rodolphe Gilbert [92], played the match of his life, upsetting Boris Becker in straight sets in the second round. Despite these two moments of joy, it was a disappointing event for the French players. Gilbert, the only Frenchman to reach the third round, represented the worst French Open performance for the hosts since 1978.
From the beginning of the tournament, the vast majority of spectators expected a final meeting between the double champion Jim Courier and the almost 19-year-old Andrei Medvedev. The Ukrainian confirmed expectations, especially in the first set of the quarterfinal, as he demolished Stefan Edberg in just 16 (!) minutes. When things became more complicated, Medvedev displayed his hidden weapon – the offensive lob; in sets 3 and 4, he played 14 lobs, gaining 11 points. However, he was shocked in the semifinal by Sergi Bruguera, whom he had previously defeated twice on clay in events leading up to Paris. Bruguera, en route to the final, won as many as five sets 6-0 and also five sets 6-1! He caught amazing form after the opening set of the event when he had to save four set points on return.
In the top half of the draw, Courier actually dominated as predicted, although his form didn’t excite as a year before. In the third round and quarterfinal, he was involved in tight four-setters (winning 7-5 in the fourth set in both cases) against players he was expected to beat easily 3-0. The semifinal meant another tight four-setter, this time against serve-and-volleyer Richard Krajicek, who had prevailed in three consecutive five-setters. Krajicek’s 4R win on Centre Court, 10-8 in the fifth set against Carlos Costa, was particularly impressive as the Dutchman was trailing 5:6 (15/30) on return in the decider. It was only one of two matches that edition which lasted more than four hours (4:12h… yes, matches in the 90s were much shorter than the current ones, the 20-second rule contributed).
In spite of troubles, Courier was still the favorite to secure his third consecutive title in Paris, having defeated Bruguera in their previous four meetings without dropping a set. However, Bruguera’s easier path to the final proved to be crucial. The Spaniard came back from a 0:2 deficit in the final set to win in 4 hours. The following year, they would meet again on the same court in the semifinal, with Bruguera leaving it as the victor once more.
Bruguera might be called “the most boring king of clay”, his reign featured the years 1993-94, even though, apart from claiming the two most important titles on that surface, he only won one out of six possible Masters 1K titles at the time. What was Bruguera’s clay-court phenomenon? He primarily played high-percentage tennis. He aimed for a high first-serve percentage (~60%), often just blocking opponent’s fast serves with a forehand slice to engage in gruelling rallies as often as possible. He tried to cover around 70% of the ground-strokes with his heavy topspin forehands, played from the open stance (not common practice at the time), usually operating 2-3 meters behind the baseline. His backhand was a shot to keep the ball in play in general, but similarly to the triple French Open champion, Mats Wilander, he possessed acute backhand passing-shots, especially down the line which was still important in the 90s when many players were attacking the net on a constant basis (Bruguera faced two players of this type during each of his ’93 & ’94 routes to the Parisian titles).
In the quarterfinal of the junior event, 18-year-old Albert Costa, the ultimate runner-up, defeated one year younger Gustavo Kuerten 2-6, 6-3, 6-3. They both would win the main Parisian title in the future: Costa in 2002, Kuerten in the years 1997, 2000-01.

========================

Excellent draw at Queen’s Club (the first grass-court event of the season), perhaps the best in the tournament’s history, with five past or future Wimbledon champions. The main favorite, Pete Sampras, was stunned in his opening match by Grant Stafford [110], despite being two games away from finishing it 2-0 or 2-1. “I just felt tired and a bit weak,” said Sampras. “I’ve been in Europe for five weeks now and I’m tired of it.” (he played on clay for four successive weeks). That match would remain the best victory in the career of 22-year-old Stafford. He stated: “I felt good today. I’m surprised ranking-wise, but I served and returned well, and it all came together nicely.” Stafford’s peer, Jamie Morgan [83], played the tournament of his life but experienced how perverse tennis can be: the Australian won three dramatic matches in succession (in the quarterfinal, he saved two match points against Stefan Edberg), but one point separated him from winning a fourth in a row; Morgan had four match points before losing to the eventual champion Michael Stich 7-5, 4-6, 6-8 (Queen’s Club was the only ATP event in the 90s played without a tie-break at 6-all in the 3rd set – it changed in 1996). In the 57-minute final, Stich already led 5:1* in the 2nd set against his doubles partner that week (Stich & Wayne Ferreira as a pair lost in the quarterfinals). The event marked the best comeback of the season: in the third-round meeting of Anglo-Saxon players who were competing to achieve their career-best result, US David Witt [191, qualifier] defeated UK Chris Wilkinson [176, wild card] 3-6, 7-5, 6-3, trailing 1:5 in the 2nd set!
The other grass-court event that week, which had a much more modest lineup, took place in the Netherlands and gave the first title to Arnaud Boetsch [29], the 24-year-old Frenchman whose last five sets finished with a ‘6-3’ score. Wally Masur made a season record in terms of saving set points as he ousted the local favorite Richard Krajicek 6-3, 7-6(14) – facing nine set points, and what’s pretty remarkable, there were no mini-breaks until the penultimate point of the marathon 30-point tie-break. Masur would avenge defeat to Boetsch in the Wimbledon third round a few weeks later after a dramatic five-setter.
Two 21-year-old qualifiers enjoyed an interesting event in central Italy: Filip Dewulf [145] and Jordi Burillo [107]. Dewulf won his two opening rounds 7-6 in 3rd sets before losing to the eventual champion Thomas Muster, whom Dewulf would sensationally defeat two years later in the Vienna final. Burillo, for the second time in 1993, advanced to the final as a qualifier. He seemed to be a promising player for the rest of the 90s, but the year 1993 remained his best one. In 1995, he would play his third and last ATP final. Muster triumphed in Florence third time in a row (he didn’t defend the title in 1994).
…Finals 2023…
ROLAND GARROS (€49.6M; clay semi-outdoors)
(3)🇷🇸Novak Đoković d. (4)🇳🇴Casper Ruud 7-6(1), 6-3, 7-5
…Finals 1993…
ROLAND GARROS ($4.1M; clay outdoors)week 21/22
(10)🇪🇸Sergi Bruguera d. (2)🇺🇸Jim Courier 6-4, 2-6, 6-2, 3-6, 6-3
Queens Club ($600K; grass outdoors)week 23
(6)🇩🇪Michael Stich d. (7)🇿🇦Wayne Ferreira 6-3, 6-4
Rosmalen ($275K; grass outdoors)
(8)🇫🇷Arnaud Boetsch d. (7)🇦🇺Wally Masur 3-6, 6-3, 6-3
Florence ($275K; clay outdoors)
(1)🇦🇹Thomas Muster d. (q)🇪🇸Jordi Burillo 6-1, 7-5
Top 10 after the first half of the season:
1993: Sampras – Courier – Edberg – Becker – Bruguera – Ivanisevic – Lendl – A.Medvedev – Stich – Korda
2023: Djokovic – Alcaraz – D.Medvedev – Ruud –  Tsitsipas – Rune – Rublev – Fritz – Sinner – Khachanov 
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment