Points won by each set: | 41-31, 27-16 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
37 % Enqvist – 16 of 43
29 % Clement – 21 of 72
Super boring match and a convincing win for the ~20 cm taller favorite who overwhelmed his opponent with sheer power. The 1st game was the longest – Enqvist [8] broke after 7 deuces (10 minutes). [50] Clement’s only Masters 1K semifinal; he had defeated in straight sets two much higher ranked players (Ferrero & Kafelnikov) and I guess he believed more in his abilities on hardcourts (outdoors) which helped him to sensationally reach the Australian Open final a few months later.
Points won by each set: | 41-31, 27-16 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
37 % Enqvist – 16 of 43
29 % Clement – 21 of 72
Super boring match and a convincing win for the ~20 cm taller favorite who overwhelmed his opponent with sheer power. The 1st game was the longest – Enqvist [8] broke after 7 deuces (10 minutes). [50] Clement’s only Masters 1K semifinal; he had defeated in straight sets two much higher ranked players (Ferrero & Kafelnikov) and I guess he believed more in his abilities on hardcourts (outdoors) which helped him to sensationally reach the Australian Open final a few months later.
Serve & volley: Enqvist 0, Clement 0/1