Points won by each set: | 29-22, 29-19, 35-26 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
18 % Higueras – 14 of 76
8 % Connors – 7 of 84
Shocking scoreline which is a bit misleading – ‘deuce’ games were the key, there were seven, and Higueras [17] won them all. Connors [2] was surprisingly passive, perhaps he drew some conclusions on their previous match (North Conway ’81) which Higueras emphatically won 6-4, 6-1. He was keeping the ball in court patiently with a good depth, but once Connors attacked, the Spaniard accelerated his shots; one of those rallies occurred on the first match point, and a backhand cross-court pass gave the 29-year-old Higueras a 2-hour 30-minute victory over the one year older opponent. Connors was in the “best position” in the mid-set as there was 2-all (30-all). “I don’t think it was an easy match at all,” said Higueras, “I was running a lot.”
Points won by each set: | 29-22, 29-19, 35-26 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
18 % Higueras – 14 of 76
8 % Connors – 7 of 84
Shocking scoreline which is a bit misleading – ‘deuce’ games were the key, there were seven, and Higueras [17] won them all. Connors [2] was surprisingly passive, perhaps he drew some conclusions on their previous match (North Conway ’81) which Higueras emphatically won 6-4, 6-1. He was keeping the ball in court patiently with a good depth, but once Connors attacked, the Spaniard accelerated his shots; one of those rallies occurred on the first match point, and a backhand cross-court pass gave the 29-year-old Higueras a 2-hour 30-minute victory over the one year older opponent. Connors was in the “best position” in the mid-set as there was 2-all (30-all). “I don’t think it was an easy match at all,” said Higueras, “I was running a lot.”
Serve & volley: Higueras 0, Connors 0/2