rg01kuerten_corretja

Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to rg01kuerten_corretja

  1. Voo de Mar says:
    Points won by each set | 41-47, 39-35, 30-20, 26-6 |
    Points won directly behind the serve:
    24 % Kuerten – 30 of 123
    11 % Corretja – 14 of 121

    # Just like a year before, Kuerten [1] needed a complex four-setter in the final to raise the trophy in Paris for the third and last time. After a long opener in which Corretja [13] led all the time, he began with 2:0* the 2nd set. He wasted a mini-set point at 5-all and from that moment the tight final turned into a one-sided encounter. The 4th set it’s actually the most one-sided set in all Open Era major finals – Kuerten had a triple match point on Corretja’s second serve having lost just two points in that set, then Corretja took advantage of Kuerten’s total relaxation, won four points, but committed a double fault and lost the last three points. It was Corretja’s second and last Grand Slam final (following his three-set defeat to Carlos Moya in 1998). Quite interesting that Kuerten overcame in Paris a nightmarish period of playing tie-breaks: as he began the 3rd set tie-break against Alami, he had an abysmal 2-13 record for the season! As the best player in the world, something similar experienced Sampras in 1995.

    Kuerten’s route to his 14th title:
    1 Guillermo Coria 6-1, 7-5, 6-4
    2 Agustin Calleri 6-4, 6-4, 6-4
    3 Karim Alami 6-3, 6-7(3), 7-6(5), 6-2
    4 Michael Russell 3-6, 4-6, 7-6(3), 6-3, 6-1 – 1 m.p.
    Q Yevgeny Kafelnikov 6-1, 3-6, 7-6(3), 6-4
    S Juan Carlos Ferrero 6-4, 6-4, 6-3
    W Alex Corretja 6-7(3), 7-5, 6-2, 6-0

    Thanks to the famous “Russell match”, Kuerten became the first match point-down Slam champion in Paris since Adriano Panatta in 1976

    # Comparison of Kuerten’s 4-set finals at Roland Garros:
    2000: Kuerten d. M.Norman 6-2, 6-3, 2-6, 7-6… 3 hours 44 minutes… Total points: 159-157… 38 games
    2001: Kuerten d. Corretja 6-7, 7-5, 6-2, 6-0…. 3 hours 12 minutes… Total points: 137-108… 39 games

Leave a Reply