Courier  as one of the best players in the Open Era, obviously defeated many times a few best players of his generation and the previous one*, except Lendl . It worked a mechanism of a psychological advantage over an opponent I guess, because Lendl had easily beaten twice the Courier teenager. When Courier was a Top 10 player he lost to Lendl two times more, winning just five games on both cases (4-6 1-6 in Tokyo ’91). “I feel like I’m hitting the ball cleanly, and serving well,” said Lendl, who faced only one break point in three ’round robin’ matches (he also beat Forget & Novacek). “It is all falling into place.” Despite the bitter loss to Lendl, Courier reached the final which he lost in four sets to Pete Sampras, who had overpowered Lendl in the semifinal… I believe Courier could have got his revenge on Lendl if they had met in the following last three years of Lendl’s career.
Lendl – 187 kph
Courier – 179 kph
You must be logged in to post a comment.