Points won by each set: | 32-38, 48-41, 33-37, 41-39, 32-29 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
40 % Washington – 72 of 179
40 % Radulescu – 78 of 191
Only one point separated Radulescu [91] from becoming, arguably, the least expected semifinalist in the Wimbledon history (Open Era). The 22-year-old Romanian German, who had been known just in the Challenger circuit prior to 1996, created some attention around himself already in the first round because he ousted – in his major debut – a 15th seeded Arnaud Boetsch in a dramatic contest (the Frenchman led 3:1* and was serving at 6:5 in the decider). Radulescu also won another two matches in five setters, and statisticians noticed that no-one before him had served so many aces in the opening three rounds of a major and no-one had played at least 10 hours in the first three rounds of Wimbledon (10:10h in total):
Radulescu withstood four match points serving at 5:6 in the 3rd set vs Pescosolido, he was serving four times to stay in the decider. Two miraculous victories in the first two rounds, super easy 4R win over a qualifier, who also achieved a career-best result (Neville Godwin), and the luck was on his side in the quarterfinal too (he trailed *3:5 in the first tie-break and saved two mini-set points at 4-all in the 3rd set, then when he had a set point at 6:5, the rain interrupted the game for a few minutes). Great journey was spoiled in the 4th set – Radulescu led 6:5* (40/15) being on verge of a dramatic 4-set victory when he made two backhand errors (passing-shot & return off Washington’s 2nd serve). Washington [20] won the ensuing tie-break easily and saved a break point at 1-all in the decider. Radulescu stayed calm with fresh memories of prolonged 5th sets in the opening two rounds; he ceded the first point in game no. 9 (Washington’s line called out), there was *4:5 (40/15) when his third two-game advantage set seemed inevitable – then occurred a minor catastrophe. Up to that moment, Washington had been struggling to win two points in a row as a receiver, and then he obtained four (!): FH volley error – double fault – overhead error – double fault… the dream was over. The crazy encounter on court no. 1 lasted 3 hours 31 minutes (7 hours 35 minutes including four rain breaks!), the tie-breaks: 5/7, 7/1, 7/3. Radulescu would play only two more times at Wimbledon, and due to injuries he needed to quit at the age of 25.
It was the first match in history in which the winner got his only break in the last game of the match; in latter stages of majors only once before had occurred a five-setter similarly dominated by holding, in Melbourne 1992 when Krajicek survived against Stich after four minutes longer encounter with one more break
Points won by each set: | 32-38, 48-41, 33-37, 41-39, 32-29 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
40 % Washington – 72 of 179
40 % Radulescu – 78 of 191
Only one point separated Radulescu [91] from becoming, arguably, the least expected semifinalist in the Wimbledon history (Open Era). The 22-year-old Romanian German, who had been known just in the Challenger circuit prior to 1996, created some attention around himself already in the first round because he ousted – in his major debut – a 15th seeded Arnaud Boetsch in a dramatic contest (the Frenchman led 3:1* and was serving at 6:5 in the decider). Radulescu also won another two matches in five setters, and statisticians noticed that no-one before him had served so many aces in the opening three rounds of a major and no-one had played at least 10 hours in the first three rounds of Wimbledon (10:10h in total):
1R: Boetsch 6-3, 6-4, 6-7, 5-7, 9-7… 3:09h… 27 aces
2R: Pescosolido 4-6, 6-7, 7-6, 6-1, 10-8… 3:43h… 36 aces
3R: Wheaton 6-7, 6-4, 6-4, 4-6, 6-3… 3:18h… 28 aces
Radulescu withstood four match points serving at 5:6 in the 3rd set vs Pescosolido, he was serving four times to stay in the decider. Two miraculous victories in the first two rounds, super easy 4R win over a qualifier, who also achieved a career-best result (Neville Godwin), and the luck was on his side in the quarterfinal too (he trailed *3:5 in the first tie-break and saved two mini-set points at 4-all in the 3rd set, then when he had a set point at 6:5, the rain interrupted the game for a few minutes). Great journey was spoiled in the 4th set – Radulescu led 6:5* (40/15) being on verge of a dramatic 4-set victory when he made two backhand errors (passing-shot & return off Washington’s 2nd serve). Washington [20] won the ensuing tie-break easily and saved a break point at 1-all in the decider. Radulescu stayed calm with fresh memories of prolonged 5th sets in the opening two rounds; he ceded the first point in game no. 9 (Washington’s line called out), there was *4:5 (40/15) when his third two-game advantage set seemed inevitable – then occurred a minor catastrophe. Up to that moment, Washington had been struggling to win two points in a row as a receiver, and then he obtained four (!): FH volley error – double fault – overhead error – double fault… the dream was over. The crazy encounter on court no. 1 lasted 3 hours 31 minutes (7 hours 35 minutes including four rain breaks!), the tie-breaks: 5/7, 7/1, 7/3. Radulescu would play only two more times at Wimbledon, and due to injuries he needed to quit at the age of 25.
It was the first match in history in which the winner got his only break in the last game of the match; in latter stages of majors only once before had occurred a five-setter similarly dominated by holding, in Melbourne 1992 when Krajicek survived against Stich after four minutes longer encounter with one more break