uo82connors_lendl

uo82connors_lendl

Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to uo82connors_lendl

  1. Voo de Mar says:
    Points won directly behind the serve:
    17 % Connors – 21 of 119
    25 % Lendl – 32 of 128
    When they’d met three weeks before, in the Cincinnati semifinal, Lendl stunned Connors 6-1, 6-1!
    In the 3rd set of the US Open ’82 final, Connors led 3:1* (30/0), then squandered two mini-match points at 4-all.

    Connors’ route to the title:
    1 Borowiak 7-6(5), 6-2, 6-3
    2 Pfister 6-4, 6-3, 6-2
    3 Arias 6-4, 4-6, 6-4, 6-1
    4 Nastase 6-3, 6-3, 6-4
    Q Harmon 6-1, 6-3, 6-4
    S Vilas 6-1, 3-6, 6-2, 6-3
    W Lendl 6-3, 6-2, 4-6, 6-4

    Comparison of their two US Open finals in succession:
    1982: Connors d. Lendl 6-3, 6-2, 4-6, 6-4… 3 hours 9 minutes… 37 games… Total points: 135-112 (247)
    1983: Connors d. Lendl 6-3, 6-7(2), 7-5, 6-0… 3 hours 3 minutes… 40 games… Total points: 144-126 (270)

    Connors: 1st % in – 76/118 (64 %) and 88/118 (74 %); points at the net – 41/66 (62 %) and 21/38 (55 %)
    Lendl: 1st % in – 70/129 (54 %) and 72/152 (47 %); points at the net – 8/17 (47 %) and 10/18 (55 %)

    Points won by each set:
    | 33-24, 33-21, 40-42, 29-25 | &
    | 28-22, 44-48, 38-34, 34-22 |

Leave a Reply