Points won by each set: [ 28-15, 27-17, 25-11 ]
Points won directly behind the serve:
18 % Hewitt – 12 of 65
24 % Kafelnikov – 14 of 58
Hewitt had led 4-1 vs Kafelnikov in their H2H, but no-one could expect such a one-sided encounter. The Australian [4] completely dominated the flat baseline rallies, the Russian [7] couldn’t hit a winner off his usually stronger backhand side, he tried to attack the net a couple of times, but almost every time was passed. Similar disappointment at this stage of the event will occur 14 years later #
# Comparison of most one-sided US Open semifinals: 2001: Hewitt d. Kafelnikov 6-1, 6-2, 6-1… 1 hour 22 minutes… Total points: 80-43 2015: Djokovic d. Cilic 6-0, 6-1, 6-2… 1 hour 25 minutes… Total points: 83-39
Points won by each set: [ 28-15, 27-17, 25-11 ]
Points won directly behind the serve:
18 % Hewitt – 12 of 65
24 % Kafelnikov – 14 of 58
Hewitt had led 4-1 vs Kafelnikov in their H2H, but no-one could expect such a one-sided encounter. The Australian [4] completely dominated the flat baseline rallies, the Russian [7] couldn’t hit a winner off his usually stronger backhand side, he tried to attack the net a couple of times, but almost every time was passed. Similar disappointment at this stage of the event will occur 14 years later #
# Comparison of most one-sided US Open semifinals:
2001: Hewitt d. Kafelnikov 6-1, 6-2, 6-1… 1 hour 22 minutes… Total points: 80-43
2015: Djokovic d. Cilic 6-0, 6-1, 6-2… 1 hour 25 minutes… Total points: 83-39